Skywalker18 wrote:
Researchers have discovered that a quick study of the hands — more specifically, the lengths of the index and ring fingers — can reveal a lot about a person’s personality and risk of disease. Of course, your fingers don’t actually control these issues; it’s closer to the other way around.
Which of the following statements is best supported by the above information?
A.The larger the difference in the length of the index fingers and ring fingers, the clearer the understanding of the person’s personality that can be achieved through the study of hands.
B.The lengths of the ring and index fingers are expected to be different for people with different personalities.
C.It is difficult to ascertain through the study of hands the personality and disposition to disease of a person with almost no difference in the length of index and ring fingers.
D.Other fingers, except the ring and index fingers, do not provide much information about a person’s personality and risk of disease.
E.A person’s personality and risk of disease is generally controlled by the length of the index and ring fingers.
I would go with D.
choices B and D are the only ones to focus on.
more specifically, the lengths of the index and ring fingers — can reveal a lot about a person’s personality and risk of disease.B says - the lengths of the ring and index fingers are expected to be different for people with different personalities.
This can be an assumption. The question asks us to pick an answer most strongly supported by, i.e. inference. Option B assumes by using the word expected.
D says -Other fingers, except the ring and index fingers, do not provide
much information about a person’s personality and risk of disease.
Now much information
does not mean no information. They do provide information but not as much as the index and ring.
The passage clearly states -
quick study of the hands — more specifically, the lengths of the index and ring fingers — can reveal a lot about a person’s personality and risk of disease.This means that the lengths of the duo provide more info than those of others. Otherwise ,why would the author mention the word "MORE SPECIFICALLY " ?
We have to choose an answer best supported by. B is an assumption for the researchers. There can be plenty of assumptions. But between these 2 ,D is well supported.