1. I do not quite understand what does corresponding describe- in all options?
According to me, it describes increase (which I dont think is a non though I don't know what kind of word is it- maybe verb?). If it describes increase by this logic, corresponding is incorrect and it should be an adverb not an adjective. Also 'sales' according to be is the noun which is in prep phrase so can an adjective refer to a noun in a prep phrase?
2. Grammatically, how is unaccompanied correspondingly incorrect, and correspondingly increased sales - only tell me gramatically irrespective of the rest of the sentence
3. Another thing I'm a little doubtful of is whether we should make decisions in GMAT basis use of 'unaccompanied' or 'not accompanied'. What if the sentence with 'not accompanied' had some other issue instead of the sentence with 'unaccompanied' so we would have to go with 'unaccompanied' sentence right?
b2bt wrote:
@
egmatWhile considering option B, I was able to identify that rising inventories needs a plural verb but as said by WaterFlowsUp is the use of "when" nonsensical?
(B) Rising inventories,
when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.
According to me, in the above sentence, when refers to a situation (noun event) which is correct.
"possibly leads" is incorrect as "rising inventories" needs a plural verb.
Please explain,with the context of above question, the difference between "if" and "when", if any.
Hi b2bt,
Thank you for the post.
You have correctly said that “in the above sentence, when refers to a situation”. However there is a change in meaning if ‘when’ is replaced by ‘if’.
Let’s take two simple examples to understand:
•
When Joey comes to India, Rahul will meet him.
• If Joey comes to India, Rahul will meet him. Is there a difference in the meaning of the above sentences?
Yes, there is. The first sentence tells us about a certain event in the future, while the second one poses a condition. From the first sentence we know that the event of Joey coming to India is certain. So, Rahul will get to meet Joey. However, there is no such certainty in the second sentence.
Now, let’s look at
option B:
• Rising inventories,
when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.
This sentence conveys the meaning that we are talking about some specific cases in which the rising inventories are not accompanied by something. However, from the context it seems that a condition and its result is presented by the sentence.
Also, there is one more error in option B as pointed out by you. So, the correct answer is option E.
Hope this helps!
Deepak