Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:09 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:09
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
shikhasing4
Joined: 15 Sep 2018
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 183
Own Kudos:
30
 [1]
Given Kudos: 131
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 183
Kudos: 30
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,884
 [1]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ag153
Joined: 16 Feb 2017
Last visit: 15 May 2022
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ag153
1. I do not quite understand what does corresponding describe- in all options?
According to me, it describes increase (which I dont think is a non though I don't know what kind of word is it- maybe verb?). If it describes increase by this logic, corresponding is incorrect and it should be an adverb not an adjective. Also 'sales' according to be is the noun which is in prep phrase so can an adjective refer to a noun in a prep phrase?
increases is used as a noun in option E.

By the way, another way to find this out is that both increases and sales are preceded by prepositions (by and in respectively). Hence, increases and sales are nouns (since prepositions are followed by nouns).
User avatar
Tanvi01
Joined: 24 Jan 2021
Last visit: 15 Aug 2023
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 20
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What is the property of accompanied here. Is it a verb?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tanvi01

Often, we'll run across something that looks like a past tense verb, but is really a modifier. That's the case here. Unless we have a subject for "accompanied" ("I accompanied my brother to the party"), it's a modifier. In this case, it's modifying "inventories." If rising inventories are not accompanied (by blah blah), they can lead to cutbacks.
avatar
clicbrics2017
Joined: 30 Mar 2022
Last visit: 30 Mar 2022
Posts: 1
Location: India
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by expansions in deals, can prompt creation reductions. To decide if the modifier "correspondingly" is put properly or not, read the sentence and ask yourself, what ought to correspondingly change.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,193
Own Kudos:
4,759
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,193
Kudos: 4,759
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tanvi01
What is the property of accompanied here. Is it a verb?

Hello Tanvi01,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, in this sentence "accompanied" is a past participle that serves as a modifier; in this case, we can tell that it is a modifier rather than an active verb because it is separated from the noun it acts upon ("inventories") by a comma; commas are not used to link active verbs to the nouns they act upon.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Dinesh654
Joined: 08 Jun 2021
Last visit: 11 Aug 2024
Posts: 155
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Status:In learning mode...
Location: India
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Posts: 155
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi experts,

I got this one right but still in doubt!
Both when and if meanings make sense!
How to know which one is right?

How to approach such questions? the aren't any easier split to spot!
they are time taking!
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dcoolguy
Hi experts,

I got this one right but still in doubt!
Both when and if meanings make sense!
How to know which one is right?

How to approach such questions? the aren't any easier split to spot!
they are time taking!
If you see a decision point, and both options seem okay to you, don't use that decision point!

Quote:
(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead
Here, "correspondingly" seems to modify "unaccompanied." I know what "corresponding increases in sales" means -- sales increases connected to rising inventories. But what on earth does it mean for something to be "unaccompanied correspondingly?" That's gibberish. (A) is out.

Quote:
(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads
The subject for "leads" is "rising inventories." That's no good. It should be "rising inventories lead." (B) is out.

Quote:
(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead
These verb tenses make no sense together. "When they were" implies something that actually happened in the past. "Can lead" suggests a hypothetical future connection. No good. Eliminate (C).

So there we go. (A), (B), and (C) are all out without having to worry about the "if/when" choice.

The takeaway: if one issue isn't clear to you, look for another!

I hope that helps!
User avatar
GMATmona07
Joined: 23 Jun 2022
Last visit: 13 Sep 2023
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
Posts: 24
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts,
Will someone please explain, why "correspondingly increased sales" in D is incorrect, or is is just redundant and why "corresponding increases in sales" in E is correct.

Thanks
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATmona07
Hi Experts,
Will someone please explain, why "correspondingly increased sales" in D is incorrect, or is is just redundant and why "corresponding increases in sales" in E is correct.

Thanks
Let's start with (E). A "corresponding increase" is just an associated increase. The adjective "corresponding" is describing the noun, "increase."

In other words, one increase is connected to another. What kind of increase was it? An associated, or corresponding increase. That makes sense. Keep (E).

In (D), I'm not entirely sure what it means if something is "correspondingly increased." Now "increased" is an adjective and "correspondingly" seems to be an adverb describing "increased." So something was increased in a corresponding fashion? I just can't make sense of this phrase.

Even if we want to argue that you can eventually figure out what the writer is trying to say, it's certainly not as clear or logical as what we see in (E).

But we don't have to worry about it, because (D) has the construction "Rising inventories...possibly leads." That's a clear subject-verb disagreement, since it should be "rising inventories lead."

So (D) is out, and no agonizing is required.

I hope that helps!
   1   2   3 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts