GMATmona07
Hi Experts,
Will someone please explain, why "correspondingly increased sales" in D is incorrect, or is is just redundant and why "corresponding increases in sales" in E is correct.
Thanks
Let's start with (E). A "corresponding increase" is just an associated increase. The adjective "corresponding" is describing the noun, "increase."
In other words, one increase is connected to another. What kind of increase was it? An associated, or
corresponding increase. That makes sense. Keep (E).
In (D), I'm not entirely sure what it means if something is "correspondingly increased." Now "increased" is an adjective and "correspondingly" seems to be an adverb describing "increased." So something was increased in a corresponding fashion? I just can't make sense of this phrase.
Even if we want to argue that you can eventually figure out what the writer is trying to say, it's certainly not as clear or logical as what we see in (E).
But we don't have to worry about it, because (D) has the construction "Rising inventories...possibly
leads." That's a clear subject-verb disagreement, since it should be "rising inventories lead."
So (D) is out, and no agonizing is required.
I hope that helps!