Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:09 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:09
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
OptimusPrepJanielle
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Last visit: 08 Sep 2017
Posts: 1,779
Own Kudos:
1,483
 [1]
Given Kudos: 23
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,779
Kudos: 1,483
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
alwaysnewbie
Joined: 08 Feb 2016
Last visit: 05 Nov 2016
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
183
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 31
Kudos: 183
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATmantra
Joined: 20 Oct 2016
Last visit: 14 Feb 2019
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
66
 [6]
Posts: 20
Kudos: 66
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,417
 [2]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,417
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There are various kinds of nouns that act as subjects. To start with, you may have a single- word proper noun or a pronoun that may start a sentence, acting as the subject.
Ex: Tom, Dick or Harry, Jack and Jill, New York, the United States, he, she, it, they, I, we, and so on.

Then, there may be simple noun phrases that are modified by an adjective before them: Ex; Rising inventories, increased pressure, Oil price, share market, tall structures, etc, etc. Some of the adjectives are nouns by themselves though acting as adjectives. In this construction, the verb is always decided by the attributes of the true noun that follows the adjective.

There is one more kind of noun known as the substantive noun; this involves a phrase with a long series of words that may comprise a participle, a gerund, an infinitive, a relative subordinate clause or some such similar thing. For sure, these substantive noun phrases that act as singular subjects will always be followed by a singular verb.
Ex:
Consuming one full pint of alcohol a day is sure to land one in the hospital bed one day.
Swimming against the tide of a river gives enormous strength to body muscles.
Being branded as a national champion is a dream of many.
To be branded as a national champion is a dream of many.
That they have been selected to play for their country in the Championship Trophy is a great honor to them
That they won the one- day World Cup match was the beginning of Sri Lanka's rise to stardom in Cricket.

You might see many of these substantive nouns may comprise plural words, but still, the noun is usually only singular
User avatar
sdlife
Joined: 21 Jul 2015
Last visit: 05 Nov 2025
Posts: 185
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 489
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Posts: 185
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts, OG says that the use of 'correspondingly' in the original sentence is incorrect and ambiguous. My understanding is that 'correspondingly'(adverb) is modifying the adjective 'unaccompanied'. Adverb can modify adjective, but here the meaning that comes out because of that modification is absurd. Is my reasoning correct? In some posts, unaccompanied is called a "verb". I don't think that is correct.

Also, what is the role of "if" here? Is it an adverb or a conjunction? I've seen that usually if is followed by a clause, but here it's followed by a past participle.

Please advise. Thanks!
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
15,523
 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sdlife
Hi Experts, OG says that the use of 'correspondingly' in the original sentence is incorrect and ambiguous. My understanding is that 'correspondingly'(adverb) is modifying the adjective 'unaccompanied'. Adverb can modify adjective, but here the meaning that comes out because of that modification is absurd. Is my reasoning correct? In some posts, unaccompanied is called a "verb". I don't think that is correct.

Also, what is the role of "if" here? Is it an adverb or a conjunction? I've seen that usually if is followed by a clause, but here it's followed by a past participle.

Please advise. Thanks!

1. Yes, your reasoning is correct. For proper meaning, the word "corresponding" has to refer to "increase".
2. Yes, you are right. "Unaccompanied" is a past participle (used as an adjective) referring to "inventories".
3. Conjunctions such as "if", although" etc. are ideally used to join a dependent clause to an indepedent clause, but I remember seeing examples in GMAT, in which they are used to join a phrase (in this case past participle modifier) to the main clause.
User avatar
gmatdordie
Joined: 13 Nov 2018
Last visit: 02 Jun 2020
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
117
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V32
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V32
Posts: 87
Kudos: 117
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
greenka
Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.


(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead

(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads

(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead

(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads

(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead

The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 11th Edition, 2005



Practice Question
Question No.: SC 8
Page: 639

I am wondering that Rising inventories is plural or singular? Could u pls explain to me? In the first place, I understand that Rising inventories is singular sub. Later, I get that N + N so the later noun is more important so it should be plural sub. But, now I read Sub-Verb agreement in Manhattan, it said that all subject phrases are singular. Foe example, Having good friends is a wonderful thing. Also, Reading books gives us knowledge and pleasure. Why two examples are singular sub?? How they differ from Rising inventories??

Pls explain to me. I got confused so much. Thanks a lot!

Attachment:
01.jpg
Attachment:
02.jpg
Attachment:
03.jpg

rising inventories is subkect so plural
(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead -

(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads -leads for inventories incorrect

(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead- they ambigious, also when is not correct, as sentence conveys negative menainng

(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads -leads incorrect

(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead-correct
avatar
Cheryn
Joined: 11 Sep 2017
Last visit: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
51
 [1]
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 25
Kudos: 51
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
if as a conditional there are rules right

if + past tense , then past tense or would + verb

here in choice E, if + past tense(not accompanied) , then present tense ( can lead)

could any experts through light on , where i am misinterpreting things

thanks in advance
cheryn
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [3]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Cheryn
here in choice E, if + past tense(not accompanied) , then present tense ( can lead)
Hi Cheryn, in choice E, accompanied is not used as a verb but as a past participle.

The sentence could be interpreted as follows:

If (Rising inventories are) not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.
avatar
Cheryn
Joined: 11 Sep 2017
Last visit: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
51
 [1]
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 25
Kudos: 51
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle
Cheryn
here in choice E, if + past tense(not accompanied) , then present tense ( can lead)
Hi Cheryn, in choice E, accompanied is not used as a verb but as a past participle.

The sentence could be interpreted as follows:

If (Rising inventories are) not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.


thanks EducationAisle, so here if condition + present tense verb ( "are") + past participle , then present tense.. it follows the rule. thanks


now one more silly doubt, when to use increase in and when to use increases in , might be very silly but suddenly this confusing me now over the usage of increases in sales.
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Cheryn

now one more silly doubt, when to use increase in and when to use increases in , might be very silly but suddenly this confusing me now over the usage of increases in sales.
Hi Cheryn, none of the options seems to be using increase in, and hence this is a non-issue here.

Even if it had been present, I would not use it to split between the options.
User avatar
santorasantu
Joined: 27 Aug 2014
Last visit: 06 Apr 2023
Posts: 242
Own Kudos:
457
 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Netherlands
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: ISB '21 LBS '22
GPA: 3.9
WE:Analyst (Energy)
Schools: ISB '21 LBS '22
Posts: 242
Kudos: 457
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have a question regarding the usage of increases (singular). Why is increases used in the correct answer choice E?

Rising inventories, if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.


should'nt it be increase in sales? I'm not able to understand the usage of singular form. please help!
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [3]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
santorasantu
I have a question regarding the usage of increases (singular). Why is increases used in the correct answer choice E?

Rising inventories, if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.


should'nt it be increase in sales? I'm not able to understand the usage of singular form. please help!
Increases is singular only if we use it as a verb.

1 This strategy increases the company's debt significantly. ← This is fine. Strategy is a singular noun, and it takes a singular verb (increases).
2 These strategies increase the company's debt significantly. ← If we switch to a plural subject (strategies), we'll need a plural verb (increase).

However, when used as a noun, increases is plural.

3 The increase in the company's debt is a sign of... ← Here the subject is increase (singular noun), and it needs a singular verb like is.
4 The increases in the company's debt are a sign of... ← Here the subject is increases (plural noun), and it needs a plural verb like are.
User avatar
santorasantu
Joined: 27 Aug 2014
Last visit: 06 Apr 2023
Posts: 242
Own Kudos:
457
 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Netherlands
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: ISB '21 LBS '22
GPA: 3.9
WE:Analyst (Energy)
Schools: ISB '21 LBS '22
Posts: 242
Kudos: 457
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
santorasantu
I have a question regarding the usage of increases (singular). Why is increases used in the correct answer choice E?

Rising inventories, if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.


should'nt it be increase in sales? I'm not able to understand the usage of singular form. please help!
Increases is singular only if we use it as a verb.

1 This strategy increases the company's debt significantly. ← This is fine. Strategy is a singular noun, and it takes a singular verb (increases).
2 These strategies increase the company's debt significantly. ← If we switch to a plural subject (strategies), we'll need a plural verb (increase).

However, when used as a noun, increases is plural.

3 The increase in the company's debt is a sign of... ← Here the subject is increase (singular noun), and it needs a singular verb like is.
4 The increases in the company's debt are a sign of... ← Here the subject is increases (plural noun), and it needs a plural verb like are.


Thanks Arun, If I understand correctly, Rising Inventories(Subject), if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales (prep phrase), can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.

Inside the prep phrase, increases is used as a noun and both increase and increases are correct.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [3]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
santorasantu
Thanks Arun, If I understand correctly, Rising Inventories(Subject), if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales (prep phrase), can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.

Inside the prep phrase, increases is used as a noun and both increase and increases are correct.
You're right that corresponding increases is inside a prepositional phrase. That preposition is by. Think of that part of the sentence as saying "if not accompanied by X".

by corresponding increases in sales...

Both corresponding and in sales point to increases. So within the noun phrase corresponding increases in sales, we have another prepositional phrase, in sales. We can again look at it as in X. In this case, the X is sales (noun).

And yes, we should be able to use either increase or increases. I like increases more though.

Rising inventories, if not accompanied by a corresponding increase in sales... ← This one seems to refer to one increase in sales.
Rising inventories, if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales... ← This one fits better with corresponding. That is, there is an increase in sales to "match" every increase in inventory levels. That makes more sense (to me), given that this sentence appears to be discussing the impact of rising inventories on the entire economy.

This question doesn't test that though, as there is no option with increase.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun already wrote a couple of great responses to this, so my post is probably a waste of space. But I wrote this offline a week ago, and stupidly never posted it. So here you go, just in case it's useful to hear this stuff in a different voice... :|
santorasantu
I have a question regarding the usage of increases (singular). Why is increases used in the correct answer choice E?

Rising inventories, if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.


should'nt it be increase in sales? I'm not able to understand the usage of singular form. please help!
This is entirely about context and meaning. The plural subject, "rising inventories," suggests that we're talking about multiple businesses. If more than one business experiences an increase in sales, we'd have multiple increases, right? So "increases" makes perfect sense - the rising inventories should correspond to multiple increases in sales.

Better yet, we can see immediately that (B) and (D) have a clear subject-verb agreement error: "rising inventories... leads," so we can eliminate those answer choices. (A), (C), and (E) all contain "increases," so this isn't an issue we need to evaluate at all. Better to focus on the differences among the remaining options.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
dracarys007
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 24 Feb 2022
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
223
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Posts: 68
Kudos: 223
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rising inventories, - The ing form is used as a gerund and a noun in this sentence which is plural
when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, - this part of the sentence is modifying the rising inventories.
can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.


SV Pair – inventories can lead is correct since rising inventories is plural

(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead

When is usually used to show the time aspect and is not used for conditionals.
(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads
When is usually used to show the time aspect and is not used for conditionals.

(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead
When is usually used to show the time aspect and is not used for conditionals.

(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads
SV Pair – inventories can lead is correct since rising inventories is plural

(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead
This is the correct choice.
avatar
raunak1922
Joined: 21 Jun 2020
Last visit: 20 Mar 2022
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
8
 [2]
Given Kudos: 21
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.6
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 13
Kudos: 8
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead

(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads

(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead
Eliminating A B C because can lead means there is a possibility of an event taking place

(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads - plural subject hence lead is better

(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead - CORRECT ANSWER
avatar
emmieemma
Joined: 28 Mar 2020
Last visit: 10 May 2021
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 45
Location: Germany
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat

Hi b2bt,
Thank you for the post. :)

You have correctly said that “in the above sentence, when refers to a situation”. However there is a change in meaning if ‘when’ is replaced by ‘if’.
Let’s take two simple examples to understand:
When Joey comes to India, Rahul will meet him.
If Joey comes to India, Rahul will meet him.


Is there a difference in the meaning of the above sentences?
Yes, there is. The first sentence tells us about a certain event in the future, while the second one poses a condition. From the first sentence we know that the event of Joey coming to India is certain. So, Rahul will get to meet Joey. However, there is no such certainty in the second sentence.

I thought that the conditional of the following form indicates certainty. (particular case in the future WITH certainty)

If PRESENT, then FUTURE.

Example: If Sophia EATS pizza tomorrow, then she WILL BECOME sick.


and, if you have uncertainty the relevant form is:

If HYPOTHETICAL SUBJUNCTIVE, then CONDITIONAL..

Example: If Sophia ATE pizza tomorrow, then she WOULD BECOME sick.


Please correct me, if I am wrong on this one.

egmat
ScottTargetTestPrep
GMATNinja
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
emmieemma
egmat

Hi b2bt,
Thank you for the post. :)

You have correctly said that “in the above sentence, when refers to a situation”. However there is a change in meaning if ‘when’ is replaced by ‘if’.
Let’s take two simple examples to understand:
When Joey comes to India, Rahul will meet him.
If Joey comes to India, Rahul will meet him.


Is there a difference in the meaning of the above sentences?
Yes, there is. The first sentence tells us about a certain event in the future, while the second one poses a condition. From the first sentence we know that the event of Joey coming to India is certain. So, Rahul will get to meet Joey. However, there is no such certainty in the second sentence.

I thought that the conditional of the following form indicates certainty. (particular case in the future WITH certainty)

If PRESENT, then FUTURE.

Example: If Sophia EATS pizza tomorrow, then she WILL BECOME sick.


and, if you have uncertainty the relevant form is:

If HYPOTHETICAL SUBJUNCTIVE, then CONDITIONAL..

Example: If Sophia ATE pizza tomorrow, then she WOULD BECOME sick.


Please correct me, if I am wrong on this one.
You basically have it correct, but the point is that a condition presented via the use of "if" is not a certain condition. It's a possible condition.

    If Jim sees this, he will be happy.

It is possible but not certain that Jim will see this.

On the other hand, a condition presented via the use of "when" is a certain future condition.

    When the sun is shining, Jim will be able to see this.

This sentence presents the condition "the sun is shining" as certain to exist in the future.
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts