GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Oct 2018, 12:13

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The widespread staff reductions in a certain region s

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 392
The widespread staff reductions in a certain region s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Feb 2007, 23:47
5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

42% (02:20) correct 58% (02:27) wrong based on 238 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The widespread staff reductions in a certain region’s economy are said to be causing people who still have their jobs to cut back on new purchases as though they, too, had become economically distressed. Clearly, however, actual spending by such people is undiminished, because there has been no unusual increase in the amount of money held by those people in savings accounts.

Which of the following explains why the savings accounts balance did not increase in spite of decrease in spending on new purchases?

(A) If people in the region who continue to be employed have debts, they are now paying them off at an accelerated rate.
(B) People in the region who continue to be employed and who have relatives who have lost their jobs commonly assist those relatives financially.
(C) If people in the region who have lost jobs get new jobs, the new jobs generally pay less well than the ones they lost.
(D) People in the region who continue to be employed are pessimistic about their prospects for increasing their incomes.
(E) There exist no statistics about sales of goods in the region as a whole.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1529
Location: Ann Arbor
Schools: Ross '10
Re: The widespread staff reductions in a certain region s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Feb 2007, 23:51
gmacvik wrote:
The widespread staff reductions in a certain region’s economy are said to be causing people who still have their jobs to cut back on new purchases as though they, too, had become economically distressed. Clearly, however, actual spending by such people is undiminished, because there has been no unusual increase in the amount of money held by those people in savings accounts.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
(A) If people in the region who continue to be employed have debts, they are not now paying them off at an accelerated rate.
(B) People in the region who continue to be employed and who have relatives who have lost their jobs commonly assist those relatives financially.
(C) If people in the region who have lost jobs get new jobs, the new jobs generally pay less well than the ones they lost.
(D) People in the region who continue to be employed are pessimistic about their prospects for increasing their incomes.
(E) There exist no statistics about sales of goods in the region as a whole.


The conclusion can be true only if there are only 2 choices for spending money.

Spending on purchases
Saving

If people spend money on other things, like debts, then the lack of increase in savings does not mean that the spending is not diminished.

We need A

(A) If people in the region who continue to be employed have debts, they are not now paying them off at an accelerated rate.

to be true for the conclusion to be made.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1408
Schools: Chicago Booth '11
Re: The widespread staff reductions in a certain region s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Feb 2007, 14:14
"they are not now" is that proper english or am I just dumb. lol
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 505
Re: The widespread staff reductions in a certain region s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Feb 2007, 14:20
Hi,
Partly agree with rdg. If A is true, i.e if they are not paying debts at accelearated rate then the savings account should have shown an increase which is not the case as mentioned in the argument.

But again B also cannot be the choice. Nowhere it is written in the question about what employed people do. Do they have relatives who have lost the jobs. hence this statement is out of scope.

Remember, we are asked about the assumption on which argument relies. If simply written the questions says that :

Some people lost jobs -> Still employed people cut their expenses though it is not evident looking at their savings account. Which means that they might not have actually cut expenses. But the job losses may have caused a cascading effect and they also fear of losing the job. hence a sense of pessimism prevails about their prospects.

Therefore according to me the Answer is D.

What is the OA and OE ..???

-Regards.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2006
Posts: 124
Re: The widespread staff reductions in a certain region s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2007, 05:03
Honestly, I can barely see any connection between the scope of the stem and A.

gmacvik, where did you get this question?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 05 Oct 2016
Posts: 130
Location: China
Concentration: Healthcare, Entrepreneurship
WE: Sales (Health Care)
Re: The widespread staff reductions in a certain region s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Dec 2016, 00:17
17. The argument in the passage proceeds by doing which one of the following?
(A) concluding that since an expected consequence of a supposed development did not take place
(B) concluding that since only one of the two predictable consequences of a certain kind of behavior is observed to occur this observed occurrence cannot, in the current situation, be a consequence of such behavior
(C) arguing that since people’s economic behavior is guided by economic self-interest only misinformation or error will cause people to engage in economic behavior that harms them economically
(D) arguing that since two alternative developments exhaust all the plausible possibilities one of those developments occurred and the other did not
(E) concluding that since the evidence concerning a supposed change is ambiguous, it is most likely that no change is actually taking place
anther question with the same stimuli OA is A
why not D?
_________________

LSAT CR is driving me mad

Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3036
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The widespread staff reductions in a certain region s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2016, 05:30
YangYichen wrote:
17. The argument in the passage proceeds by doing which one of the following?
(A) concluding that since an expected consequence of a supposed development did not take place
(B) concluding that since only one of the two predictable consequences of a certain kind of behavior is observed to occur this observed occurrence cannot, in the current situation, be a consequence of such behavior
(C) arguing that since people’s economic behavior is guided by economic self-interest only misinformation or error will cause people to engage in economic behavior that harms them economically
(D) arguing that since two alternative developments exhaust all the plausible possibilities one of those developments occurred and the other did not
(E) concluding that since the evidence concerning a supposed change is ambiguous, it is most likely that no change is actually taking place
anther question with the same stimuli OA is A
why not D?


First, if at all A is the OA, then the question is wrongly set. The question is not an suumption type, but an explain discrepency type. The question should be something as follows:

Which of the following explains why the savings accounts balance did not increase in spite of decrease in spending on new purchases?

Moreover in this case option A should have been:
If people in the region who continue to be employed have debts, they are not now paying them off at an accelerated rate.

This question seems to be flawed.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3036
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The widespread staff reductions in a certain region s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2016, 05:31
gmacvik wrote:
The widespread staff reductions in a certain region’s economy are said to be causing people who still have their jobs to cut back on new purchases as though they, too, had become economically distressed. Clearly, however, actual spending by such people is undiminished, because there has been no unusual increase in the amount of money held by those people in savings accounts.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
(A) If people in the region who continue to be employed have debts, they are not now paying them off at an accelerated rate.
(B) People in the region who continue to be employed and who have relatives who have lost their jobs commonly assist those relatives financially.
(C) If people in the region who have lost jobs get new jobs, the new jobs generally pay less well than the ones they lost.
(D) People in the region who continue to be employed are pessimistic about their prospects for increasing their incomes.
(E) There exist no statistics about sales of goods in the region as a whole.


The above question has been modified because of the flaw described in the above post.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 05 Oct 2016
Posts: 130
Location: China
Concentration: Healthcare, Entrepreneurship
WE: Sales (Health Care)
Re: The widespread staff reductions in a certain region s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2016, 19:55
sayantanc2k wrote:
gmacvik wrote:
The widespread staff reductions in a certain region’s economy are said to be causing people who still have their jobs to cut back on new purchases as though they, too, had become economically distressed. Clearly, however, actual spending by such people is undiminished, because there has been no unusual increase in the amount of money held by those people in savings accounts.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
(A) If people in the region who continue to be employed have debts, they are not now paying them off at an accelerated rate.
(B) People in the region who continue to be employed and who have relatives who have lost their jobs commonly assist those relatives financially.
(C) If people in the region who have lost jobs get new jobs, the new jobs generally pay less well than the ones they lost.
(D) People in the region who continue to be employed are pessimistic about their prospects for increasing their incomes.
(E) There exist no statistics about sales of goods in the region as a whole.


The above question has been modified because of the flaw described in the above post.

i agree with u. i'm so confused with the second question. So this can be a debatable problem.
_________________

LSAT CR is driving me mad

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3185
Premium Member
Re: The widespread staff reductions in a certain region s  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Sep 2018, 21:23
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

-
April 2018: New Forum dedicated to Verbal Strategies, Guides, and Resources

GMAT Club Bot
Re: The widespread staff reductions in a certain region s &nbs [#permalink] 17 Sep 2018, 21:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The widespread staff reductions in a certain region s

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.