GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Jan 2019, 21:19

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
  • The winners of the GMAT game show

     January 22, 2019

     January 22, 2019

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    In case you didn’t notice, we recently held the 1st ever GMAT game show and it was awesome! See who won a full GMAT course, and register to the next one.
  • Key Strategies to Master GMAT SC

     January 26, 2019

     January 26, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Attend this webinar to learn how to leverage Meaning and Logic to solve the most challenging Sentence Correction Questions.

A year ago the government reduced the highway speed limit, and

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Senior PS Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done.
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 670
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
A year ago the government reduced the highway speed limit, and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jan 2019, 00:39
1
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

29% (00:52) correct 71% (01:09) wrong based on 143 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A year ago the government reduced the highway speed limit, and in the year since, there have been significantly fewer highway fatalities than there were in the previous year. Therefore, speed limit reduction can reduce traffic fatalities.

The argument is most vulnerable to the criticism that it takes for granted that

(A) highway traffic has not increased over the past year.
(B) the majority of drivers obeyed the new speed limit.
(C) there is a relation between driving speed and the number of automobile accidents.
(D) the new speed limit was more strictly enforced than the old.
(E) the number of traffic fatalities the year before the new speed limit was introduced was not abnormally high.

_________________

Regards,
Gladi



“Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 20 May 2017
Posts: 15
CAT Tests
Re: A year ago the government reduced the highway speed limit, and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jan 2019, 01:40
Straight B.

If a majority of drivers refuse to obey new limitations and despite this fact, fatalities decreased it is clear that something else caused fatalities to decrease and therefore make an argument "flawed"
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Sep 2016
Posts: 67
Re: A year ago the government reduced the highway speed limit, and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jan 2019, 18:12
Gladiator59 wrote:
A year ago the government reduced the highway speed limit, and in the year since, there have been significantly fewer highway fatalities than there were in the previous year. Therefore, speed limit reduction can reduce traffic fatalities.

The argument is most vulnerable to the criticism that it takes for granted that

(A) highway traffic has not increased over the past year.
(B) the majority of drivers obeyed the new speed limit.
(C) there is a relation between driving speed and the number of automobile accidents.
(D) the new speed limit was more strictly enforced than the old.
(E) the number of traffic fatalities the year before the new speed limit was introduced was not abnormally high.


IMO E
If for whatever reasons(say hug influx of tourists & hence traffic) the accident rate was high, the rate may have decreased without any intervention after the original situation(tourists gone back) may have resumed.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Jun 2018
Posts: 32
Location: India
Schools: IMD '20
GPA: 2.84
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Re: A year ago the government reduced the highway speed limit, and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2019, 03:17
nightblade354 can you shed some light on this CR question?

Posted from my mobile device
CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 455
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Reviews Badge
A year ago the government reduced the highway speed limit, and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2019, 05:30
Quick lesson: When the LSAT asks you what the question took for granted, it is asking for the assumption. But, there are still ways to get around this question with negating each statement. We are still trying to weaken the argument.

A year ago the government reduced the highway speed limit, and in the year since, there have been significantly fewer highway fatalities than there were in the previous year. Therefore, speed limit reduction can reduce traffic fatalities.

The argument is most vulnerable to the criticism that it takes for granted that

(A) highway traffic has not increased over the past year. -- So what if it has? This has no connection to accidents. You would have to assume more people = more accidents. And that, itself, is an accident to avoid.
(B) the majority of drivers obeyed the new speed limit. -- OK, what if less than half obeyed the new law. Would this destroy the argument? Nope. We have no concrete numbers, so if we say that some adhere to the new speed limit, how does this destroy the argument? This could easily cause the number to go up, stay the same, or go down.
(C) there is a relation between driving speed and the number of automobile accidents. -- OK, what if that relationship means that speeds going down increases accidents?
(D) the new speed limit was more strictly enforced than the old. -- What does "more" mean? Does that mean 1 extra ticket a month? Or 1 extra ticket for every driver?
(E) the number of traffic fatalities the year before the new speed limit was introduced was not abnormally high. -- Bingo bango. If the number was abnormally high (say 100), and then the new speed limit made it 50, who is to say this caused the drop? This is our answer.
_________________

D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Need a laugh and a break? Go here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/mental-break-funny-videos-270269.html

Need a CR tutor? PM me!

Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2189
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: A year ago the government reduced the highway speed limit, and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2019, 08:52
A year ago the government reduced the highway speed limit, and in the year since, there have been significantly fewer highway fatalities than there were in the previous year. Therefore, speed limit reduction can reduce traffic fatalities.

The argument is most vulnerable to the criticism that it takes for granted that

This is telling us that the argument is taking something for granted (assuming something to be true) and we need to figure out what the argument is assuming.
Boil it down-The argument is flawed in that it mistakes a correlation between two events for a causal one. The argument took for granted that something else did not cause the reduction in the number of traffic fatalities.

(A) highway traffic has not increased over the past year. -Incorrect; states the opposite of what it should. Increasing highway traffic would increase the risk of traffic accidents.
(B) the majority of drivers obeyed the new speed limit. -Incorrect; need not be true. The reduced highway speed limit could have reduced highway fatalities even if only some people had obeyed the new speed limit.
(C) there is a relation between driving speed and the number of automobile accidents.- Incorrect; Why do we need to assume any connection between the speed limit and the number of accidents? Couldn't it be the case that the reduced highway speed doesn't reduce the number of accidents, but it does reduce the severity of those accidents so that more people survive them.
(D) the new speed limit was more strictly enforced than the old. - Incorrect; The new speed limit could have been equally enforced as the old speed limit and yet the new speed limit could still have reduced the number of highway traffic fatalities.
(E) the number of traffic fatalities the year before the new speed limit was introduced was not abnormally high. - Correct; eliminates a possible alternative explanation for why there was a reduction in the number of highway traffic fatalities.

Answer E

A nice analogy to illustrate option E(found in MGMAT forum)-

One night, Kobe Bryant scored 81 points in a basketball game (though his average is about 30 points per game). If he scored 30 points the following night, we could say that he scored fewer points than he did the previous game.

Say he wore a new pair of shoes for the 30 point game. Would we say, "Ah, clearly wearing a new pair of shoes can decrease how many points Kobe scores"?

We could, but we could also just say "the new shoes didn't do anything wrong. This is an average, normal game. It's the 81 point game that needs an explanation. THIS game doesn't need one."

That's the way that (E) is hurting the argument. You wouldn't give new speed limits "causal credit" if the fatality number came back to average.

(In statistics, this is called a natural "regression to the mean")

After an outlier data point, you're going to naturally see subsequent data points that are closer to the average. This drift doesn't need an explanation beyond the law of averages.
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Posts: 212
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Re: A year ago the government reduced the highway speed limit, and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2019, 09:02
It is basically asking for an assumption.So clear E.

If you negate E we get the accidents were abnormally high.So the reduction could in fact be a natural reduction.hence...

Not B because highway fatalities are actually caused by a very very small proportion of drivers...

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A year ago the government reduced the highway speed limit, and &nbs [#permalink] 22 Jan 2019, 09:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A year ago the government reduced the highway speed limit, and

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.