Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 21:17 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 21:17

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Alum
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4341
Own Kudos [?]: 51450 [9]
Given Kudos: 2326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
Schools: Ross '20 (M)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 May 2015
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 45 [2]
Given Kudos: 28
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Sep 2014
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 146 [2]
Given Kudos: 89
Concentration: Marketing, Healthcare
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 121
Own Kudos [?]: 790 [1]
Given Kudos: 56
Send PM
Re: An increase in the number of protons, when unaccompanied corresponding [#permalink]
1
Kudos
This one was easy ,

For subject -verb agreement we need 'produces' so scanning choices only E and C are left . Then C is out because of "when that " .

Reading back E makes perfect sense in sentence
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1015
Own Kudos [?]: 2755 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Send PM
Re: An increase in the number of protons, when unaccompanied corresponding [#permalink]
1
Kudos
souvik101990 wrote:


An increase in the number of protons, when unaccompanied correspondingly by an increase in the number of neutrons, almost always produce an unstable isotope of an element higher on the Periodic Table.

A. when unaccompanied correspondingly by an increase in the number of neutrons, almost always produce

B. when not accompanied by a corresponding increase in the number of neutrons, almost always produce

C. when that is unaccompanied correspondingly by an increase in the number of neutrons, almost always produces

D. if not accompanied by a correspondingly increased number of neutrons, almost always produce

E. if not accompanied by a corresponding increase in the number of neutrons, almost always produces

Day 1 Question of the Verbal Contest: Race Against the GMAT Club Timer
Please make sure to post a brief reply without revealing your solution to enter the contest!


Increase needs singular verb produces thereby we can eliminate A,B and D.
Usage of when that indicates pronoun error as that cannot be used to refer to when and when cannot refer to the no of protons.
This eliminates option C.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Re: An increase in the number of protons, when unaccompanied corresponding [#permalink]
1
Kudos
An increase ---> produces (not produce)

This leaves us with options C and E.

"not accompanied" is more preferred over "unaccompanied"
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1267
Own Kudos [?]: 5650 [0]
Given Kudos: 416
Send PM
Re: An increase in the number of protons, when unaccompanied corresponding [#permalink]
OE:
The “when”/”if” split at the beginning tells us nothing: either one of those could be correct.

Split #1: let’s start with the meat-and-potato grammatical issue of subject-verb agreement. The subject of the sentence is “increase”, which is singular, so we need a singular verb. Choices (A) & (B) & (D) have the plural verb “produce”, which is incorrect; only (C) & (E) have the correct singular verb, “produces.”

Split #2: “correspondingly” vs. “corresponding”. This is a very tricky split. The word “correspondingly” is an adverb, and so must modify a verb or participle --- here, it would have to modify “unaccompanied.” The word “corresponding” is an adjective, and so it must modify a noun ---- here, it would have to modify the second appearance of the word “increase.” We can ask the simple question: what corresponds to what? what matches what? Well, we are talking about an increase in one thing is matched by an increase in another ---- the two increases are “corresponding.” By contrast, there is something bizarrely illogical about “unaccompanied correspondingly” ---- “unaccompanied” means two things don’t go together, and “correspondingly” means the two things do go together, so in this sense, “unaccompanied correspondingly” is an inherent contradiction. We will reject choices (A) and (C) which have this phrase.

This leaves (E) as the only possible grammatical correct answer.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17223
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: An increase in the number of protons, when unaccompanied corresponding [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: An increase in the number of protons, when unaccompanied corresponding [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne