Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 19:49 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 19:49

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Difficulty: 805+ Levelx   Strengthenx               
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2012
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 32 [2]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V33
GPA: 3
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2021
Posts: 131
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [2]
Given Kudos: 409
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Sep 2013
Status:suffer now and live forever as a champion!!!
Posts: 88
Own Kudos [?]: 421 [1]
Given Kudos: 74
Location: India
Dheeraj: Madaraboina
GPA: 3.5
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2015
Posts: 72
Own Kudos [?]: 50 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
WE:Design (Aerospace and Defense)
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
1
Kudos
this is not a good question.If A is correct we have to assume that Blacks lived in Senegal and Gambia and they consumed lots of salt.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2016
Posts: 85
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [1]
Given Kudos: 40
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
1
Kudos
TommyWallach wrote:
Hey All,

Conclusion: Predisposition to HBP reflects Western high-salt diets and genes adapted to scarcity of salt
Premise: Black Americans twice as likely to get HBP as White Americans. Westernized Black Africans twice as likely to get HBP as White Africans.
Assumption: ???

Strengthen and Weaken questions often relate to assumptions, but more likely when the question asks you to strengthen or weaken the ARGUMENT itself. In this case, we're asked to strengthen the hypothesis (i.e. conclusion), which means we're likely to bring in new information, so it's unlikely we'll be able to predict the assumption...

(A) The blood pressures of those descended from peoples situated throughout their history in Senegal and Gambia, where salt was always available, are low.
ANSWER: This gives NEW INFORMATION that matches up with the hypothesis (not much salt, no blood pressure problems).

(B) The unusually high salt consumption in certain areas of Africa represents a serious health problem.
PROBLEM: This neither strengthens nor weakens. We want a connection between blood pressure and salt.

(C) Because of their blood pressure levels, most White Africans have markedly decreased their salt consumption.
PROBLEM: This is tricky. Even though it connects blood pressure and salt, it does it in the wrong way. We want to see salt AFFECTING blood pressure. But here we're only told that these people have decreased their salt consumption because of their blood pressure. Has it worked? We don't know.

(D) Blood pressures are low among the Yoruba, who, throughout their history, have been situated far inland from sources of sea salt and far south of Saharan salt mines.
PROBLEM: This is less tricky than it looks. This just says a tribe without salt doesn't have high blood pressure. This would strengthen the conclusion that salt causes high blood pressure. But we already know that. We want to know if there's a genetic link that causes those with a history of low-salt diets to develop high blood pressure when moved to the West. This doesn't address the West at all.

(E) No significant differences in salt metabolism have been found between those people who have had salt available throughout their history and those who have not.
PROBLEM: You could argue this has no effect (what do we care about salt metabolism?) or weakens, because it's breaking the link between history and blood pressure that the conclusion wants to make.

Hope that helps!

-t


Though of elaborating A as it took me some time to understand it.
Interaction of two factors responsible for high BP -
1. High salt diet
2. Genes - adapted to low salt
In A, the first factor is missing(although salt is available, the diet may not be high salt one) hence it proves that the high salt diet(not the availability of salt) is a contributor & hence A strengthens the argument.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Status:GMAT Coach
Posts: 170
Own Kudos [?]: 284 [0]
Given Kudos: 65
Location: Peru
GPA: 3.98
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
pkm9995109794 wrote:
this is not a good question.If A is correct we have to assume that Blacks lived in Senegal and Gambia and they consumed lots of salt.


The blood pressures of those descended from peoples situated throughout their history in Senegal and Gambia, where salt was always available, are low.

This means that the people of this area are adapted to a high salt diet, so they - are less likely to have high blood pressure. This is what the conclusion claims. It does not matter the color or race of the people.

It supports the argument by showing a case in which the cause produces the effect.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5183
Own Kudos [?]: 4654 [0]
Given Kudos: 632
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Skywalker18 wrote:
In OA-A (also in option D), we need to know(assume) that Senegal and Gambia are part of Africa and Blacks lived in those countries. Also, although option D is incorrect, the question expects us to assume that Yoruba is an African tribe?
I knew that Senegal is an African country but hadn't heard about Gambia. So, can the GMAT expect us to assume(know) such things?
Generally, GMAT CR depends on a lot of "outside information". This is not really a problem, and in most question types, we encourage students to be open to using generally known facts and relationships to solve CR questions on the GMAT. Unfortunately, while there is nothing that defines exactly what can be used and what can't, this is something that has to be done. There would be no way to make a compact CR question otherwise.

As for this question, I think what they are asking for is not unreasonable, but if it helps, this is quite an old question too. These days the GMAC takes extra care to check for differences in a question's characteristics across different segments of the base of test takers. That entire initiative is why we also see more questions that are about people or things not exclusively American.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
Why is D wrong,can anyone explain ??

Posted from my mobile device
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 3480
Own Kudos [?]: 5137 [0]
Given Kudos: 1431
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Skywalker18 wrote:
In OA-A (also in option D), we need to know(assume) that Senegal and Gambia are part of Africa and Blacks lived in those countries. Also, although option D is incorrect, the question expects us to assume that Yoruba is an African tribe?
I knew that Senegal is an African country but hadn't heard about Gambia. So, can the GMAT expect us to assume(know) such things?

The short answer is no. The GMAT does not expect us to know such things.

Notice how the question is worded.

Which of the following statements about present-day, westernized Black Africans, if true, would most tend to confirm the researchers’ hypothesis?

So the question indicates that all of the answer choices are statements about present-day, westernized Black Africans. So, we don't have to know that those statements are about present-day, westernized Black Africans. The question lets us know.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2012
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 32 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V33
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
Well, i am no expert but can certainly take a shot at your question.
My answer is No, you do not need to know whether the countries mentioned in the answer choices are part of Africa. If you read the question stem carefully - "Which of the following statements about present-day, westernized Black Africans, if true, would most tend to confirm the researchers’ hypothesis" - It clearly asks about the present day, westernized Black Africans. We have to assume that that answer choices are not presenting any false information. So, these westernized black africans either may have lived in the countries mentioned or might be descendents of people from those countries.

Thanks !
Please consider pressing kudos if my explanation helped you in any way !

Skywalker18 wrote:
Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White Americans to develop high blood pressure. This likelihood also holds for westernized Black Africans when compared to White Africans. Researchers have hypothesized that this predisposition in westernized Blacks may reflect an interaction between western high-salt diets and genes that adapted to an environmental scarcity of salt.

Which of the following statements about present-day, westernized Black Africans, if true, would most tend to confirm the researchers’ hypothesis?
Boil it down - This predisposition in westernized Blacks may reflect an interaction between western high-salt diets and genes that adapted to an environmental scarcity of salt.

environmental scarcity of salt---> genes in BAs have adapted to low or NO salt diets
So western high-salt diets in BAs --> high BP


(A) The blood pressures of those descended from peoples situated throughout their history in Senegal and Gambia, where salt was always available, are low. - Correct - So in these people the cause(environmental scarcity of salt) wasn't applicable. Thus the effect is also not present.

(B) The unusually high salt consumption in certain areas of Africa represents a serious health problem. - Irrelevant

(C) Because of their blood pressure levels, most White Africans have markedly decreased their salt consumption. - Irrelevant

(D) Blood pressures are low among the Yoruba, who, throughout their history, have been situated far inland from sources of sea salt and far south of Saharan salt mines. - Irrelevant - Firstly we need to assume that Yoruba is an African tribe and this seems to be an exception to the norm mentioned

(E) No significant differences in salt metabolism have been found between those people who have had salt available throughout their history and those who have not. - Weakens - this goes against the researches hypothesis

In OA-A (also in option D), we need to know(assume) that Senegal and Gambia are part of Africa and Blacks lived in those countries. Also, although option D is incorrect, the question expects us to assume that Yoruba is an African tribe?
I knew that Senegal is an African country but hadn't heard about Gambia. So, can the GMAT expect us to assume(know) such things?

Answer A

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasKarishma , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyMurray , other experts - please enlighten
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2017
Posts: 50
Own Kudos [?]: 107 [0]
Given Kudos: 696
Location: Singapore
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44
WE:General Management (Health Care)
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
Let's examine the scientists' hypothesis by looking at the 2 variables they've put together in a 2x2 matrix.

Reasoning along the lines of what they've put forth, here are the possible outcomes to test:

Case #1: High salt diet X Low-salt genes = High BP.
Case #2: High salt diet X High-salt genes = likely to not be as prone to high BP compared to case 1.
Case #3: Low salt diet X High-salt genes = Likely low BP, but not mentioned in the question stem.
Case #4: Low salt diet X Low-salt genes = Likely low BP as well (but again, not mentioned in the question stem).

When examining effects of variables on certain outcomes, it is always advisable to change ONLY 1 variable at a time, so that we can isolate that effect on the outcome variable (i.e. attribute it to one particular change in variable only).

Option B: Unusually high salt concentration presents a health problem - question: is that 'health problem' cited = high blood pressure? We don't know.

Option C: Were the blood pressures of White Africans high to start with? Unknown --> not applicable.

Option D: Yoruba people presumably had a low-salt gene pool, but it is unclear if their diets were high or low salt to begin with. Not conclusive.

Option E: Postulates a lack of correlation between the variables the scientists set out to investigate. Not applicable.

Only Option A changes 1 particular variable and presents us with a likely option to test the hypothesis. In addition, we are also told that the outcome of having a low-salt gene pool = low BP, strengthening the hypothesis of the scientists.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Apr 2019
Posts: 129
Own Kudos [?]: 147 [0]
Given Kudos: 93
Location: Canada
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE:General Management (Retail)
Send PM
Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
rohitgoel15 wrote:
Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White Americans to develop high blood pressure. This likelihood also holds for westernized Black Africans when compared to White Africans. Researchers have hypothesized that this predisposition in westernized Blacks may reflect an interaction between western high-salt diets and genes that adapted to an environmental scarcity of salt.

Which of the following statements about present-day, westernized Black Africans, if true, would most tend to confirm the researchers’ hypothesis?


(A) The blood pressures of those descended from peoples situated throughout their history in Senegal and Gambia, where salt was always available, are low.

(B) The unusually high salt consumption in certain areas of Africa represents a serious health problem.

(C) Because of their blood pressure levels, most White Africans have markedly decreased their salt consumption.

(D) Blood pressures are low among the Yoruba, who, throughout their history, have been situated far inland from sources of sea salt and far south of Saharan salt mines.

(E) No significant differences in salt metabolism have been found between those people who have had salt available throughout their history and those who have not.


Very good question. I tried finding an assumption to the argument but couldn't succeed.
However, here is what i did. I just checked which of the options best fit if i add following at the end of the passage.

Since <place your option here>, Therefore the hypothesis must be true.

A fits perfectly here because it talks about how descendants of someplace where salt was always available never developed genes related to low salt. Proves the genetic relationship.­
Current Student
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 166
Own Kudos [?]: 228 [0]
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44 (Online)
GPA: 3.61
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
The argument boils down to Unfavorable salt environment for the genes causes High blood pressure
Choice A says, when the environment for genes was favorable, blood pressure was low
In essence, when the cause was removed, the effect was not seen


Choice D says a tribe that has a low intake low salt experienced low blood pressures. But what is the gene factor of this tribe? Was there gene in general adapted to low salt diet? or were there forefathers hogging on tons of salt? Not so clear.

Note: The genes factor has been made quite explicit in choice A: The blood pressures of those descended from peoples situated throughout their history in Senegal and Gambia, where salt was always available, are low. (think 3-4 generations of people who had always ate a low salt diet)
VP
VP
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 1262
Own Kudos [?]: 201 [0]
Given Kudos: 332
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
TommyWallach wrote:
Hey All,

Conclusion: Predisposition to HBP reflects Western high-salt diets and genes adapted to scarcity of salt
Premise: Black Americans twice as likely to get HBP as White Americans. Westernized Black Africans twice as likely to get HBP as White Africans.
Assumption: ???

Strengthen and Weaken questions often relate to assumptions, but more likely when the question asks you to strengthen or weaken the ARGUMENT itself. In this case, we're asked to strengthen the hypothesis (i.e. conclusion), which means we're likely to bring in new information, so it's unlikely we'll be able to predict the assumption...

(A) The blood pressures of those descended from peoples situated throughout their history in Senegal and Gambia, where salt was always available, are low.
ANSWER: This gives NEW INFORMATION that matches up with the hypothesis (not much salt, no blood pressure problems).

(B) The unusually high salt consumption in certain areas of Africa represents a serious health problem.
PROBLEM: This neither strengthens nor weakens. We want a connection between blood pressure and salt.

(C) Because of their blood pressure levels, most White Africans have markedly decreased their salt consumption.
PROBLEM: This is tricky. Even though it connects blood pressure and salt, it does it in the wrong way. We want to see salt AFFECTING blood pressure. But here we're only told that these people have decreased their salt consumption because of their blood pressure. Has it worked? We don't know.

(D) Blood pressures are low among the Yoruba, who, throughout their history, have been situated far inland from sources of sea salt and far south of Saharan salt mines.
PROBLEM: This is less tricky than it looks. This just says a tribe without salt doesn't have high blood pressure. This would strengthen the conclusion that salt causes high blood pressure. But we already know that. We want to know if there's a genetic link that causes those with a history of low-salt diets to develop high blood pressure when moved to the West. This doesn't address the West at all.

(E) No significant differences in salt metabolism have been found between those people who have had salt available throughout their history and those who have not.
PROBLEM: You could argue this has no effect (what do we care about salt metabolism?) or weakens, because it's breaking the link between history and blood pressure that the conclusion wants to make.

Hope that helps!

-t


Hi Tommy, Can you elaborate on A? Unless I am seeing things, A tells us that 'salt is always available'. In other words, there isn't a scarcity and people still had low BP. Doesn't this strengthen since the passage says that exposure to high salt causes BP?

Maybe I got my thinking twisted.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Feb 2021
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [0]
Given Kudos: 50
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
This was so tricky but it made total sense when I saw the right answer.

So, the hypothesis states that the reason BP is high is because of a combo of western high salt diets and genes that had to adapt from a place that typically had a SCARCITY of salt.

A strengthens the hypothesis because it's saying that Senegal and Gambia already had PLENTY of salt so descendents would have low BP because they're genes didn't have to get used to high salt diets.

Posted from my mobile device
VP
VP
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 1262
Own Kudos [?]: 201 [0]
Given Kudos: 332
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
Quantum2022 wrote:
This was so tricky but it made total sense when I saw the right answer.

So, the hypothesis states that the reason BP is high is because of a combo of western high salt diets and genes that had to adapt from a place that typically had a SCARCITY of salt.

A strengthens the hypothesis because it's saying that Senegal and Gambia already had PLENTY of salt so descendents would have low BP because they're genes didn't have to get used to high salt diets.

Posted from my mobile device


I still get thrown off. The last bit of the passage says that their genes were adapted to an environmental scarcity, yet A says they descended from those who lived in areas with high salt...
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 1378
Own Kudos [?]: 846 [0]
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
Quantum2022 wrote:
This was so tricky but it made total sense when I saw the right answer.

So, the hypothesis states that the reason BP is high is because of a combo of western high salt diets and genes that had to adapt from a place that typically had a SCARCITY of salt.

A strengthens the hypothesis because it's saying that Senegal and Gambia already had PLENTY of salt so descendents would have low BP because they're genes didn't have to get used to high salt diets.

Posted from my mobile device


CEdward wrote:
Quantum2022 wrote:
This was so tricky but it made total sense when I saw the right answer.

So, the hypothesis states that the reason BP is high is because of a combo of western high salt diets and genes that had to adapt from a place that typically had a SCARCITY of salt.

A strengthens the hypothesis because it's saying that Senegal and Gambia already had PLENTY of salt so descendents would have low BP because they're genes didn't have to get used to high salt diets.

Posted from my mobile device


I still get thrown off. The last bit of the passage says that their genes were adapted to an environmental scarcity, yet A says they descended from those who lived in areas with high salt...


In my first reading , I could not relate some information with each other and end up in shortlisting A and D.
After using equation, I was sure of choosing A over D
Here is how I did it:

What is given:
Western high salt diets -- - > cause high blood pressure for people who lived in low scarcity of salt/low salt genes
Summary :
if low salt diet genes ---> Increase salt in diet ---- > causes high blood pressure
X ( history of low salt) --- > Y (increase salt diet) ---- > Z ( high blood pressure)

What I need to strengthen?
X is responsible for Z


Quote:
(A) The blood pressures of those descended from peoples situated throughout their history in Senegal and Gambia, where salt was always available, are low.

What A says:
If No X but IF Y happens Z doesn’t happen ( If history didn't have low salt then in case Y happens Z doesn't happen)
It gives me an indication that X could be the reasons for Z


Quote:
(D) Blood pressures are low among the Yoruba, who, throughout their history, have been situated far inland from sources of sea salt and far south of Saharan salt mines.

What D says:
If X low - -> Increase Y --> Z happens
With presence of X and in case Y happens, Z can happen
But this I already know. Here I am not sure whether Z can still happen if X is removed? Can there other reason for Z to happen. I don't have new information here. so this option become irrelevant.


But in presence of A( How to make a claim strengthen)
If no cause then no result --( adds value to claim) . As if cause was the reason for result
If cause then result ( D: given in argument)

A wins over D for this question.

I hope it helps.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2019
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 33
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V30 (Online)
GMAT 2: 720 Q51 V35 (Online)
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
A. The blood pressures of those descended from peoples situated throughout their history in Senegal and Gambia, where salt was always available, are low.

Where salt was always available, the genes were adapted to normal or high levels of salt. So, when exposed to high salt diets, the blood pressure levels do not rise. Contrary to the given when genes are adapted to low levels of salts, high salt diets cause high blood pressure.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Apr 2022
Posts: 114
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 704
Location: United States
Send PM
Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White Americans to develop high blood pressure. This likelihood also holds for westernized Black Africans when compared to White Africans. Researchers have hypothesized that this predisposition in westernized Blacks may reflect an interaction between western high-salt diets and genes that adapted to an environmental scarcity of salt.

Which of the following statements about present-day, westernized Black Africans, if true, would most tend to confirm the researchers’ hypothesis?

Down to (A) and (D) by POE

(A) The blood pressures of those descended from peoples situated throughout their history in Senegal and Gambia, where salt was always available, are low.

Correct. These Black Americans are from areas where salt was abundant (implying that their genes are already adapted to consumption of salt) and their blood pressure is low. This answer choices strengthens the argument that presence of salt and gene adaptation to salt really play a role when it comes to blood pressure.

(B) The unusually high salt consumption in certain areas of Africa represents a serious health problem.

(C) Because of their blood pressure levels, most White Africans have markedly decreased their salt consumption.

(D) Blood pressures are low among the Yoruba, who, throughout their history, have been situated far inland from sources of sea salt and far south of Saharan salt mines.

This answer choice just says that Black Americans who didn't have access to salt have low blood pressure. However, this doesn't bolster any link between the high blood pressure and gene adaptation, which is also part of the conclusion of the argument. Also, I don't think this answer choice even talks about the westernized Blacks so this choice is kind of out of scope.

(E) No significant differences in salt metabolism have been found between those people who have had salt available throughout their history and those who have not.
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 627
Own Kudos [?]: 31 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
Send PM
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
Between A and E - why E is wrong and A is correct.

The scope of the conclusion is "high salt diet" - in the Western world, and "genes" - in the people who typically lived in low salt regions. Thier genes are more accustomed to the low salt diets. As their genes are accustomed to the low salt diet, the moment they are exposed to high salt diets, they have a tendency to develop high BP.

Option A -The blood pressures of those descended from peoples situated throughout their history in Senegal and Gambia, where salt was always available, are low. It talks about the people who lived in areas with high availability of salt - their genes are accustomed to high salt. So, even after having exposure to salt, they don't develop high BP. This is within the scope of our argument - the interaction between salt diet and genes. Correct.

Option E - It talks about "no significant differences" - think of it as there are differences, but they aren't significant. So, first of all, it's not eliminating any alternate cause. More importantly, "Salt metabolism" is not part of the scope of the argument. I agree that for the strengthen category of questions, we expect new outside information, BUT as long as it affects the scope of the argument. So this option is, at best, out of scope. Additionally, even if there is still some doubt regarding eliminating alternate causes, as Karisma pointed out, "when there are infinite causes possible, eliminating one does not make another more likely. Only when we have a limited number of causes possible does eliminating one or some, increase the probability of the others".
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Black Americans are, on the whole, about twice as likely as White [#permalink]
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne