Hey Charles! Thanks for the awesome explanation. I just wanted to clarify a couple of things. I was choosing between (B) and (E) and chose (B) because the passage says "senior women had much authority." This phrase made me think "much authority vs. whom"? And then I went back back just a sentence: the author talks about how women (implied less senior) were inferior to men. This sequencing made me lean towards (B). And now on to my thought process of eliminating (E) -
For (E), the word, "led" made me walk away from this choice. I viewed "age" as one of the factors that involve the revision, but thought that "gender" is the main factor that actually "led" Robertson to revise her hypothesis. Her revised hypothesis still holds that age is the primary factor so no change there, right?
Reading your explanation, I now understand why (E) is correct - but unsure if I can pick this answer on the actual test day - do you have any advice after reading my thought process when I first solved this problem? Thanks!
Skywalker18 wrote:
4. The author of the passage mentions the status of age as a principle of social organization in precolonial central Kenya in highlighted text most likely in order to
(A) indicate that women’s dependence on men in precolonial Kenya was not absolute
(B) contrast the situation of senior women to that of less senior women in precolonial Kenyan society
(C) differentiate between the status and authority of precolonial Kenyan women and that of precolonial Ghanaian women
(D) explain why age superseded gender to a greater extent in precolonial Kenya than it did elsewhere in Africa
(E) identify a factor that led Robertson to revise her hypothesis about precolonial Africa
1. In a 1984 book, Claire C. Robertson argued that, before colonialism, age was a more important indicator of status and authority than gender in Ghana and in Africa generally.
2. Subsequent research in Kenya convinced Robertson that she had overgeneralized about Africa.
3. Since age apparently remained the overriding principle of social organization in central Kenya, some senior women had much authority. Thus, Robertson revised her hypothesis somewhat, arguing that in determining authority in precolonial Africa age was a primary principle that superseded gender to varying degrees depending on the situation.
Isn't Robertson's position after the revision - "in determining authority in precolonial Africa age was a primary principle that superseded gender to varying degrees depending on the situation" - still the same as her initial position 1 (in 1984 book) or does this revision refer to change with respect to point 2 ?
Thanks for all of the thoughtful detail here,
Skywalker18! Always good to see your thought process.
To answer your question,
no. Robertson's position after the revision states that age superseded gender
to varying degrees depending on the situation. In other words, Robertson made her argument more nuanced than it was before. This isn't a dramatic revision to Robertson's previous argument, but it is still an explicit change.
vishusahni9 wrote:
even after looking at all the comments in this post, I am still skeptical about E as an OA for #4.
For me Gender was the main factor for R. to revise the content. Age is a secondary factor which just helps in comparing the situation of elder women and as per passage might go, it would be a factor in Ghana also like was is precolonial age.
Because of Gender author had to come back.
Recall what choice (E) says:
Quote:
(E) identify a factor that led Robertson to revise her hypothesis about precolonial Africa
According to this choice, the status of age was most likely mentioned in order to identify
a factor that led Robertson to revise the hypothesis. Even if age is a secondary factor, it's still
a factor that led to the revision.
The second paragraph is structured to show Robertson re-considering her prior argument in more than one way, and her revision was influenced by more than one factor. And let's not forget to evaluate all of our other choices:
Quote:
(A) indicate that women’s dependence on men in precolonial Kenya was not absolute
The author never stated that women's dependence on men in precolonial Kenya was absolute in the first place. So why would the author need to indicate that women's dependence was
not absolute? Choice (A) veers away from what the author is actually writing and what Robertson was actually thinking about. (A) isn't as strong as (E), so we'll eliminate it.
Quote:
(B) contrast the situation of senior women to that of less senior women in precolonial Kenyan society
This group-to-group comparison is nowhere in the portion of the passage being highlighted. Eliminate (B).
Quote:
(C) differentiate between the status and authority of precolonial Kenyan women and that of precolonial Ghanaian women
This is another comparison that the highlighted text doesn't point to at all. Eliminate (C).
Quote:
(D) explain why age superseded gender to a greater extent in precolonial Kenya than it did elsewhere in Africa
The explanation for this difference is nowhere to be found in the passage. Eliminate (D).
(E) remains the best answer choice, with (A) a distant but reject-able second.
I hope this helps!