Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 10:55 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 10:56

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Posts: 108
Own Kudos [?]: 47 [16]
Given Kudos: 353
Send PM
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 18764
Own Kudos [?]: 22060 [3]
Given Kudos: 283
Location: United States (CA)
Send PM
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2019
Posts: 737
Own Kudos [?]: 263 [3]
Given Kudos: 84
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q46 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 2.58
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2019
Posts: 251
Own Kudos [?]: 114 [3]
Given Kudos: 472
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.56
Send PM
Re: Is x > 0? (1) 1/x < 1 (2) 1/x > x [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Statement#1: Not Sufficient

1/x < 1
1/x - 1 < 0
1-x/x < 0
(x-1)/x > 0 (x can be positive or negative)

Statement#2: Not Sufficient

1/x > x
1/x - x > 0
1 - x^2/x > 0
x^2 - 1/x < 0
(x+1)(x-1)/x < 0 (x can be positive or negative)

Combined 1&2:

Statement#1 tells us that (x-1)/x > 0
If we put this in statement#2 i.e (x+1)(x-1)/x < 0, then it implies that x+1<0 because (x-1)/x > 0.
Hence, x<-1.

If x < -1, then it is definitely not greater than 0. Hence, we have a definite NO.

Sufficient. Answer (C)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Posts: 108
Own Kudos [?]: 47 [2]
Given Kudos: 353
Send PM
Is x > 0? (1) 1/x < 1 (2) 1/x > x [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Nups1324 wrote:
Is x > 0?

(1) 1/x < 1

(2) 1/x > x

Source: Experts' Global


Hi Maxximus

I checked the video explanation but I have a doubt.

Why can't we multiply by x on both sides and thus get 1<x from statement 1 and 1>x^2 from statement.? Why do we need to only test numbers as shown in the video explanation?


Thank you :)

Originally posted by Nups1324 on 28 Nov 2020, 00:04.
Last edited by Nups1324 on 28 Nov 2020, 00:44, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Mar 2020
Posts: 226
Own Kudos [?]: 126 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GPA: 3.96
WE:Business Development (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: Is x > 0? (1) 1/x < 1 (2) 1/x > x [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Put numbers and solve

U will get always no in case if c

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Posts: 108
Own Kudos [?]: 47 [1]
Given Kudos: 353
Send PM
Re: Is x > 0? (1) 1/x < 1 (2) 1/x > x [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Maxximus wrote:
Nups1324 wrote:
Nups1324 wrote:
Is x > 0?

(1) 1/x < 1

(2) 1/x > x

Source: Experts' Global


Hi Maxximus

I checked the video explanation but I have a doubt.

Why can't we multiply by x on both sides and thus get 1<x from statement 1 and 1>x^2 from statement.? Why do we need to only test numbers as shown in the video explanation?

Tagging others just in case.
Bunuel IanStewart ScottTargetTestPrep yashikaaggarwal VeritasKarishma

Thank you :)



Multiplying or dividing by a variable is not a valid operation in inequations; because of the variable is negative, it may alter the inequality.

Example:

3 > 2

but it doesn't mean that 3x > 2x always holds

For negative values of x,

3x < 2x

This is one of the earliest concepts explained in our inequations videos; please revise the concept videos.

All the best!
Experts' Global


Oh. Okay I got my mistake. I only considered x as positive, x can be negative as well. I subconsciously took x as positive after seeing the question.
My bad. Apologies.

Now it all makes sense.

Thank you :)
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 261
Own Kudos [?]: 231 [0]
Given Kudos: 90
Send PM
Is x > 0? (1) 1/x < 1 (2) 1/x > x [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Hello,

Multiplying or dividing by a variable is not a valid operation in inequations; because if the variable is negative, it may alter the inequality.

Example:

3 > 2

but it doesn't mean that 3x > 2x always holds

For negative values of x,

3x < 2x

This is one of the earliest concepts explained in our inequations videos; please revise the concept videos.

All the best!
Experts' Global


Nups1324 wrote:
Nups1324 wrote:
Is x > 0?

(1) 1/x < 1

(2) 1/x > x

Source: Experts' Global


Hi Maxximus

I checked the video explanation but I have a doubt.

Why can't we multiply by x on both sides and thus get 1<x from statement 1 and 1>x^2 from statement.? Why do we need to only test numbers as shown in the video explanation?

Tagging others just in case.
Bunuel IanStewart ScottTargetTestPrep yashikaaggarwal VeritasKarishma

Thank you :)

Originally posted by Maxximus on 28 Nov 2020, 00:33.
Last edited by Maxximus on 28 Nov 2020, 00:44, edited 1 time in total.
VP
VP
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 1262
Own Kudos [?]: 201 [0]
Given Kudos: 332
Send PM
Re: Is x > 0? (1) 1/x < 1 (2) 1/x > x [#permalink]
Louis14 wrote:
Statement#1: Not Sufficient

1/x < 1
1/x - 1 < 0
1-x/x < 0
(x-1)/x > 0 (x can be positive or negative)

Statement#2: Not Sufficient

1/x > x
1/x - x > 0
1 - x^2/x > 0
x^2 - 1/x < 0
(x+1)(x-1)/x < 0 (x can be positive or negative)

Combined 1&2:

Statement#1 tells us that (x-1)/x > 0
If we put this in statement#2 i.e (x+1)(x-1)/x < 0, then it implies that x+1<0 because (x-1)/x > 0.
Hence, x<-1.

If x < -1, then it is definitely not greater than 0. Hence, we have a definite NO.

Sufficient. Answer (C)


For statement 2, if we choose a positive integer, say, 3, wouldn't that violate the inequality? i.e. isn't the LHS supposed to be negative?
VP
VP
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Posts: 1392
Own Kudos [?]: 542 [0]
Given Kudos: 1656
Send PM
Is x > 0? (1) 1/x < 1 (2) 1/x > x [#permalink]
Is x > 0 ?

Or

Is X = (+)Positive Value?


(1) 1/X < 1


Case 1: X = Pos.

X >1 ------ YES


Case 2: X = Neg.

X < 1 ----- and Since X < 0 b/c we are assuming it is Negative?

the Limiting Inequality stands as: X < 0 ------NO



S1 NOT SUFFICIENT


(2) 1/x > x


Testing Values in the 4 Ranges:

X > +1

0 < X < +1

-1 < X < 0

X < -1

the Ranges of X that Satisfy the Inequality are:

X < -1 ----- NO

or

0 < X < 1 ------YES


S2 NOT SUFFICIENT ALONE



TOGETHER:


If X is Positive, it must Satisfy BOTH the Inequalities in Statement 1 and Statement 2:

S1: if X is Positive: X > 1

S2: 0 < X < 1


since it is impossible for a Positive Value to Satisfy BOTH Ranges at the same time, X can NOT be a Positive Value


S1: if X is Negative: X < 1

thus, S1 tells us that any Value in the Range: X < 0 satisfies S1's Inequality


S2: X < -1


therefore, any Value in the Range of: X < -1

will Satisfy Both Statements at the Same Time


X must be negative. Definite NO.

(C)Together Sufficient
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2019
Posts: 251
Own Kudos [?]: 114 [0]
Given Kudos: 472
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.56
Send PM
Re: Is x > 0? (1) 1/x < 1 (2) 1/x > x [#permalink]
CEdward wrote:
Louis14 wrote:
Statement#1: Not Sufficient

1/x < 1
1/x - 1 < 0
1-x/x < 0
(x-1)/x > 0 (x can be positive or negative)

Statement#2: Not Sufficient

1/x > x
1/x - x > 0
1 - x^2/x > 0
x^2 - 1/x < 0
(x+1)(x-1)/x < 0 (x can be positive or negative)

Combined 1&2:

Statement#1 tells us that (x-1)/x > 0
If we put this in statement#2 i.e (x+1)(x-1)/x < 0, then it implies that x+1<0 because (x-1)/x > 0.
Hence, x<-1.

If x < -1, then it is definitely not greater than 0. Hence, we have a definite NO.

Sufficient. Answer (C)


For statement 2, if we choose a positive integer, say, 3, wouldn't that violate the inequality? i.e. isn't the LHS supposed to be negative?


Sure, 3, a positive number, may violate the inequality, but what if x= 1/2, which is also a positive number? In that case (x=1/2), x can assume a positive value without violating the inequality. Ultimately, even if one and only one value satisfies an inequality, the value stands valid. This means that statement 2 is still insufficient. Hope it helps.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Oct 2020
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: Is x > 0? (1) 1/x < 1 (2) 1/x > x [#permalink]
i tried in this way-

State 1: 1/X < 1 = (1-x)/x < 0;
x-x^2 < 0 or x < X^2

this implies that X could either positive or negative, so Not sufficient.

State II:

1/X > X;
1/X-X>0;
1-X^2/X > 0;
(X-X^3) > 0;
X > X^3;
inference; either X is negative or X is a fraction. so so Statement II also both Yes and no therefore is sufficient.

However combining Statement I and II, we can say that X is negative. (statement i says X either positive or negative) (statement 2 says, either negative or fraction), hence X must be negative.

So answer C
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2021
Posts: 55
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 106
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
Send PM
Re: Is x > 0? (1) 1/x < 1 (2) 1/x > x [#permalink]
what i did:

to check for C,

1) 1/x < 1
2) x < 1/x

Adding both, 1/x + x < 1 + 1/x

=> subtracting 1/x from both sides, x < 1.

So, answer should be E, but i know this is wrong because values like x = 0.5 doesnt satisfy St.1.

Can anyone explain what am i doing wrong when i am adding and trying to solve them algebraically?

Thanks in advance.

Bunuel
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jul 2022
Posts: 321
Own Kudos [?]: 546 [0]
Given Kudos: 179
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Nonprofit
GPA: 3.74
WE:Corporate Finance (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Re: Is x > 0? (1) 1/x < 1 (2) 1/x > x [#permalink]
Nups1324 wrote:
Is x > 0?

(1) 1/x < 1

(2) 1/x > x

Source: Experts' Global


Solved it by trying cases and drawing inferences from the statements

St 1:
X can be negative - Not satisfied
X can be positive - Satisfied
2 possibilities- one satisfies the condition, other doesnt, thus not sufficient

St 2:
X can be negative - Not satisfied
X can be a value between 0 and 1 (This is a catch)- Satisfied
2 possibilities- one satisfies the condition, other doesnt, thus not sufficient

St 1+ St 2:
Common and the only possibility. X is negative - Not satisfied
Only one solution with a single result- Sufficient
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Is x > 0? (1) 1/x < 1 (2) 1/x > x [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92947 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne