SBCErikaOlson wrote:
One other thing to keep in mind is that each school is trying to pull together a diverse (gender, ethnicity, industry, etc) class, and Stanford has less than half the number of spots HBS has. Stanford has also received a couple thousand fewer applications than HBS has (in years past). And one of the biggest factors for each applicant (that seems to be overlooked here on these boards a lot, to be honest!) is that you don't know who else is DIRECTLY competing against you for a spot at each school you applied to (meaning, if you're a white male consultant you would never be competing for a spot against, say, an female Asian i-banker) anyway. So perhaps when someone gets dinged from HBS but invited for an interview at Stanford, the people that person was directly up against (and ultimately lost out to) at HBS didn't even apply to Stanford. I have certainly had clients accepted to Stanford that were dinged everywhere else, including lower-tier schools.
All this is to say that overall, trying to figure out why the adcom makes the decisions it does is a maddening exercise and I don't recommend it. : ) Each school could admit 5 times the number of students it does and all of those people would be deserving. It's just that they can't, and at the end of the day they have to make some really tough calls.
Hope this helped to provide some perspective. Best of luck to everyone!
- - - -
I think they overlap in some ways - the ultra elite bulge bracket firms + mega stats - but also in some ways not. I was invited to interview for GSB last year but dinged at HBS without an interview. It's my impression that GSB is slightly more open towards poets and non-conventional career tracks (not necessarily industry, bc HBS does select from a wide range of industries given its class size and commitment to diversity)
THANKS!!!
here's to FAITH guys and girls! We WILL prevail
ok, on another note, time to hit up my inbox and spam folders. lol