mSKR wrote:
Hi
AndrewN Could you please share your opinion on current question vs
another questionIn current question :
correct answer:(E) increase in
consumer spending that is projected for-CORRECT
(C) projected consumer spending
increase- WRONG
But in another question:
such a construction is wrong/
(E) has increased awareness of environmental
legislation that is still pending- WRONG
(C) has increased awareness about
pending environmental legislation- CORRECT
Queries:
1. adjective noun[/i] better than
noun that adjective 2. adjective adjective2 noun better than adjective noun that adjective2?
is it?
please share your opinion how to differentiate ?
Thanks!
Hello,
mSKR. First off, thank you for bringing up another official question that does bear a grammatical resemblance to this one. If anything, the pair of questions illustrates why you should not follow grammar too closely, why you should favor a meaning-based approach instead. I notice that the keyword you did not draw attention to in this question is
increase. A meaning-based approach would call for an answer, in the context of the sentence, to the question,
The hope lies in WHAT? Placing hope in an increase (in something) makes sense; placing hope in three modifying words before we get to that increase, as in (C), is not as effective a way to communicate the same idea.
In the other question, we see that the shell of the sentence is that
the lobbying effort has increased awareness of or about something. The correct idiom for the context is
of,
to increase awareness of, not
about. That said, the answer really comes down to (D) and (E) in that case, and they look more similar than you might initially think:
Quote:
(D) has increased awareness of pending environmental legislation
(E) has increased awareness of environmental legislation that is still pending
Do you see it now? All that we are really wondering about is how to specify that the legislation is pending, since each iteration uses
environmental ahead of
legislation. I would have no reservations about opting for the terser option in this 50/50 and go for (D). Again, the call is effectively between
pending legislation or
legislation that is pending.
A meaning-based approach exposes flaws that a grammar-based approach may not, particularly in harder questions. If you spot cosmetic differences—splits—that allow you to differentiate between one answer choice and another, ask yourself what effect each one may have on the clear and concise communication of the notion that is intended to be expressed. Otherwise, you will find your hands full of seemingly arbitrary grammar rules as you comb through more and more questions, as you have pointed out above between two questions.
I hope that helps. Nice catch on the grammatical similarity.
- Andrew