Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 07 Dec 2015
Posts: 7

Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Mar 2016, 05:17
Question Stats:
67% (01:38) correct 33% (01:26) wrong based on 537 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively. What is the value of n? (1) 7m=8n (2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8299

Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Mar 2016, 05:25
Gurshaans wrote: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively. What is the value of n?
(1) 7m=8n (2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements. Hi, the Q asks us a numeric value for n.. However I gives us the ratio of m and n and II gives us the common elements in term of m again.. so NO numeric value of any kind to work on.. E But lets see what each statements tells us.. May be helpful in some other Q.. (1) 7m=8nm is a multiple of 8 and n is a multiple of 7(2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements.this means common numbers are 0.4m.. so, m has to be a multiple of 5, otherwise .4m will be decimal.. combined we can say so both m and n are multiples of 5..m is a multiple of 8*5=40 and n is a multiple of = 7*5=35 if we say we were told m <75.. we would have got our answer
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8299

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 May 2016, 09:39
broilerc wrote: chetan2u wrote: hi it may have been written in statement 2, But it is meant when both statements are combined.. As 8n = 7m.. so if m is multiple of 5 n has to be a multiple of 5.. thanks for the quick help! can you explain again why m is a multiple of 5 because of 0.4m ? sure.. there are m and n elements.. Also there are 0.4m common elements... Now these elements have to be integer.. MEANING we can't have 4.5 or 5.6 elements common, it has to be an integer say 3,4, or 5 etc.. When will 0.4*m be an integer, ONLY when m is a multiple of 5, say 5x..so 0.4 *m = 0.4*5*x = 2x, hence an integer.. m could be anything 5,10,35 or 100 but it will surely be a multiple of 5.. Hope it helps
_________________




Intern
Joined: 07 Dec 2015
Posts: 7

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Mar 2016, 05:28



Current Student
Joined: 16 Apr 2016
Posts: 1
GPA: 3.6

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Apr 2016, 13:10
I'm a little confused  can you please explain what "the intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements" translates to algebraically? Would that mean N=0.4M? Since these are sets of numbers, it's also inherently assumed that the answer will be an integer, correct?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8299

Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Apr 2016, 20:52
jecharte wrote: I'm a little confused  can you please explain what "the intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements" translates to algebraically? Would that mean N=0.4M? Since these are sets of numbers, it's also inherently assumed that the answer will be an integer, correct? Hi, Intersection of M and N consists of 0.4m elements in SET would be written as M\(\cap\)N = 0.4M.. so there are 0.4M elements common to M and N..Since M and N are integers and common elements too should be integer, 0.4M should be integer.. so M has to be a multiple of 5 for 0.4M to be an integer..
_________________



Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 480
Location: United States (LA)

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Apr 2016, 05:33
after combining both statements we still don't get the answer.if we have extra info regarding m<75,then we would have got the answer as c.but correct option is E



Intern
Joined: 17 Jan 2016
Posts: 10

Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 May 2016, 09:21
chetan2u wrote: Gurshaans wrote: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively. What is the value of n?
(1) 7m=8n (2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements. Hi, the Q asks us a numeric value for n.. However I gives us the ratio of m and n and II gives us the common elements in term of m again.. so NO numeric value of any kind to work on.. E But lets see what each statements tells us.. May be helpful in some other Q.. (1) 7m=8nm is a multiple of 8 and n is a multiple of 7(2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements.this means common numbers are 0.4m.. so, m has to be a multiple of 5, otherwise .4m will be decimal.. so both m and n are multiples of 5..combined we can say m is a multiple of 8*5=40 and n is a multiple of = 7*5=35 if we say we were told m <75.. we would have got our answerWhy do both m and n need to be multiples of 5 ? Why also n ? Could you explain the "multiple of 5" part again please?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8299

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 May 2016, 09:29
broilerc wrote: chetan2u wrote: Gurshaans wrote: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively. What is the value of n?
(1) 7m=8n (2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements. Hi, the Q asks us a numeric value for n.. However I gives us the ratio of m and n and II gives us the common elements in term of m again.. so NO numeric value of any kind to work on.. E But lets see what each statements tells us.. May be helpful in some other Q.. (1) 7m=8nm is a multiple of 8 and n is a multiple of 7(2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements.this means common numbers are 0.4m.. so, m has to be a multiple of 5, otherwise .4m will be decimal.. so both m and n are multiples of 5..combined we can say m is a multiple of 8*5=40 and n is a multiple of = 7*5=35 if we say we were told m <75.. we would have got our answerWhy do both m and n need to be multiples of 5 ? Why also n ? Could you explain the "multiple of 5" part again please? hi it may have been written in statement 2, But it is meant when both statements are combined.. As 8n = 7m.. so if m is multiple of 5 n has to be a multiple of 5..
_________________



Intern
Joined: 17 Jan 2016
Posts: 10

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 May 2016, 09:33
chetan2u wrote: hi it may have been written in statement 2, But it is meant when both statements are combined.. As 8n = 7m.. so if m is multiple of 5 n has to be a multiple of 5.. thanks for the quick help! can you explain again why m is a multiple of 5 because of 0.4m ?



Intern
Joined: 07 Apr 2016
Posts: 1

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jun 2016, 06:33
Sir,
I have a question regarding the below solution by you. Specifically in the last line where if m,75 was mentioned we would have gotten our answer. How so?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8299

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jun 2016, 06:40
prakhar4 wrote: Sir,
I have a question regarding the below solution by you. Specifically in the last line where if m,75 was mentioned we would have gotten our answer. How so? Hi Prakhar, we have got m as a multiple of 40 and n as a multiple of 35... since intersection is 0.4m, we can say that m and n are \(\neq{0}\).. so if we were given m<75, ONLY 40 would have fit in as next multiple of 40 is 80, which would have >75.. and 7m = 8n.... so 7*40 = 8n......n =35that is why suff..
_________________



Intern
Joined: 20 May 2014
Posts: 8

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jun 2016, 17:23
The question is asking for a specific value of n. Statement 1: This is a ratio, so clearly insufficient. Statement 2: Another ratio, you don't know m and this statement says nothing about n.
1+2: From statement 1: \(m = \frac{8}{7}n\) and using statement 2: Intersection contains: \(0.4(\frac{8}{7}n)\) elements. Doesn't really tell you anything about n, so answer is E. If you look at it from a higher level both statements give you some sort of ratio info, while the question is asking for a value. You can't get a value from just ratio info.



Current Student
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 28
Location: United States

Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Aug 2016, 12:27
chetan2u wrote: if we say we were told m <75.. we would have got our answer
Great explanation, thank you! However, I have one question about the above quoted bit... After combining both statements, we know that M> Multiple of 7 AND a multiple of 5 N> Multiple of 8 M/N are in the ratio of 8/7... So for ex if M = 7 x 5, then N= 8 x 5 (giving us values of M=35 and N=40) Using this logic, we can have M= 7 x 10 , then N= 8 x 10 (giving us values of M=70 and N=80) Therefore even if we were given m<75, we will still have 2 values..?? I think I am misunderstanding something maybe, can you please help to point out my misunderstanding? Thanks



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8299

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Aug 2016, 03:56
18967mba wrote: chetan2u wrote: if we say we were told m <75.. we would have got our answer
Great explanation, thank you! However, I have one question about the above quoted bit... After combining both statements, we know that M> Multiple of 7 AND a multiple of 5 N> Multiple of 8 M/N are in the ratio of 8/7... So for ex if M = 7 x 5, then N= 8 x 5 (giving us values of M=35 and N=40) Using this logic, we can have M= 7 x 10 , then N= 8 x 10 (giving us values of M=70 and N=80) Therefore even if we were given m<75, we will still have 2 values..?? I think I am misunderstanding something maybe, can you please help to point out my misunderstanding? Thanks Hi, you have understood the method but going wrong on inference from 7m=8n... This tells us that n and NOT m, is multiple of7..... M is s multiple of 8, as m= n*8/7....so n is multiple of 7
_________________



Current Student
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 28
Location: United States

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Aug 2016, 04:57
chetan2u wrote: 18967mba wrote: chetan2u wrote: if we say we were told m <75.. we would have got our answer
Great explanation, thank you! However, I have one question about the above quoted bit... After combining both statements, we know that M> Multiple of 7 AND a multiple of 5 N> Multiple of 8 M/N are in the ratio of 8/7... So for ex if M = 7 x 5, then N= 8 x 5 (giving us values of M=35 and N=40) Using this logic, we can have M= 7 x 10 , then N= 8 x 10 (giving us values of M=70 and N=80) Therefore even if we were given m<75, we will still have 2 values..?? I think I am misunderstanding something maybe, can you please help to point out my misunderstanding? Thanks Hi, you have understood the method but going wrong on inference from 7m=8n... This tells us that n and NOT m, is multiple of7..... M is s multiple of 8, as m= n*8/7....so n is multiple of 7 Yes! Thank you!! I understand now why if m<75, we would have a unique ans.. Because if M was 8x(2)x5 = 80, that is > 75! Therefore, we are only left with M=8x(1)x5 = 40! (And subsequently N=7x(1)x5 = 35!



Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2015
Posts: 55

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Jan 2017, 00:06
Lettherebelight wrote: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively. What is the value of n?
(1) 7m=8n (2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements. From 1, the LCM of 7 and 8 is 56, so you can plugin either 8 or 7 in the first equation to get the value. However since LCM is 56, the value can be any multiple of 56. For example 7(*8*4) = 8(*7*4), n can be any value 7, 14, 28 etc hence not sufficient. From 2, intersection of both elements is 0.4m and we know nothing about the value of m hence this not sufficient as well. Taking 1 and 2, does not help us in answering the question. Hence insufficient. Answer is E.



Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2015
Posts: 100

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Mar 2017, 19:14
1 ) n= 7, 14,21, 28,35, ... 70........105
m= 8, 16, 24,32, 40......80  120
2) common = .4m and it should be integer so it can be integer for m= 40 , 80, 120 so on... so n can be 35, 70, 105.... multiple value
answer is E



Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2017
Posts: 40
Location: Brazil
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Stanford '21 (D), Kellogg '21 (D), Sloan '21 (D), Ross '21 (WL), Haas '21 (D), Tuck '21 (D), Yale '21 (D), Duke '21 (D), Anderson '21 (D), Johnson '21 (WL), LBS '21 (D), IESE '21 (A)
WE: General Management (Computer Software)

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Dec 2017, 11:38
Hello,
Another way to see the second statement: (1) m : n = 8 : 7 (2) Think about groups, so: m + (n  0.4m) = T (total of elements) => 0.6m + n = T
(12) Substitute (1) in (2): 0.6 x 8n/7 = T n and T are variables, but we have just one equation to solve it. Hence, insufficient.
Best,



Intern
Joined: 02 Dec 2016
Posts: 5

Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Sep 2018, 06:14
Hi guys, could some of you quickly explain from what we can infer that the SetElements have to be integer?




Re: Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively.
[#permalink]
20 Sep 2018, 06:14



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 24 posts ]



