Last visit was: 06 Dec 2024, 00:19 It is currently 06 Dec 2024, 00:19
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
Lettherebelight
Joined: 07 Dec 2015
Last visit: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
378
 [189]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 6
Kudos: 378
 [189]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
174
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Nov 2024
Posts: 11,445
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 11,445
Kudos: 37,849
 [123]
67
Kudos
Add Kudos
54
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Nov 2024
Posts: 11,445
Own Kudos:
37,849
 [19]
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 11,445
Kudos: 37,849
 [19]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
jpe7856
Joined: 16 Apr 2016
Last visit: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
GPA: 3.6
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'm a little confused - can you please explain what "the intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements" translates to algebraically? Would that mean N=0.4M? Since these are sets of numbers, it's also inherently assumed that the answer will be an integer, correct?
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Nov 2024
Posts: 11,445
Own Kudos:
37,849
 [5]
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 11,445
Kudos: 37,849
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jecharte
I'm a little confused - can you please explain what "the intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements" translates to algebraically? Would that mean N=0.4M? Since these are sets of numbers, it's also inherently assumed that the answer will be an integer, correct?

Hi,

Intersection of M and N consists of 0.4m elements in SET would be written as --
M\(\cap\)N = 0.4M..
so there are 0.4M elements common to M and N..
Since M and N are integers and common elements too should be integer, 0.4M should be integer..
so M has to be a multiple of 5 for 0.4M to be an integer..
avatar
broilerc
Joined: 17 Jan 2016
Last visit: 17 Jul 2016
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
512
 [1]
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 8
Kudos: 512
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
Gurshaans
Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively. What is the value of n?

(1) 7m=8n
(2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements.


Hi,

the Q asks us a numeric value for n..



However I gives us the ratio of m and n and II gives us the common elements in term of m again..
so NO numeric value of any kind to work on..
E

But lets see what each statements tells us..


May be helpful in some other Q..
(1) 7m=8n
m is a multiple of 8 and n is a multiple of 7

(2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements.
this means common numbers are 0.4m..
so,
m has to be a multiple of 5, otherwise .4m will be decimal..
so both m and n are multiples of 5..

combined we can say
m is a multiple of 8*5=40
and n is a multiple of = 7*5=35

if we say we were told m <75.. we would have got our answer

Why do both m and n need to be multiples of 5 ? Why also n ? Could you explain the "multiple of 5" part again please?
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Nov 2024
Posts: 11,445
Own Kudos:
37,849
 [6]
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 11,445
Kudos: 37,849
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
broilerc
chetan2u
Gurshaans
Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively. What is the value of n?

(1) 7m=8n
(2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements.


Hi,

the Q asks us a numeric value for n..



However I gives us the ratio of m and n and II gives us the common elements in term of m again..
so NO numeric value of any kind to work on..
E

But lets see what each statements tells us..


May be helpful in some other Q..
(1) 7m=8n
m is a multiple of 8 and n is a multiple of 7

(2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements.
this means common numbers are 0.4m..
so,
m has to be a multiple of 5, otherwise .4m will be decimal..
so both m and n are multiples of 5..

combined we can say
m is a multiple of 8*5=40
and n is a multiple of = 7*5=35

if we say we were told m <75.. we would have got our answer

Why do both m and n need to be multiples of 5 ? Why also n ? Could you explain the "multiple of 5" part again please?

hi
it may have been written in statement 2, But it is meant when both statements are combined..
As 8n = 7m.. so if m is multiple of 5 n has to be a multiple of 5..
avatar
broilerc
Joined: 17 Jan 2016
Last visit: 17 Jul 2016
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 8
Kudos: 512
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
hi
it may have been written in statement 2, But it is meant when both statements are combined..
As 8n = 7m.. so if m is multiple of 5 n has to be a multiple of 5..

thanks for the quick help! can you explain again why m is a multiple of 5 because of 0.4m ?
avatar
prakhar4
Joined: 07 Apr 2016
Last visit: 29 Sep 2018
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sir,

I have a question regarding the below solution by you. Specifically in the last line where if m,75 was mentioned we would have gotten our answer. How so?
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Nov 2024
Posts: 11,445
Own Kudos:
37,849
 [5]
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 11,445
Kudos: 37,849
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
prakhar4
Sir,

I have a question regarding the below solution by you. Specifically in the last line where if m,75 was mentioned we would have gotten our answer. How so?

Hi Prakhar,

we have got m as a multiple of 40 and n as a multiple of 35...
since intersection is 0.4m, we can say that m and n are \(\neq{0}\)..

so if we were given m<75, ONLY 40 would have fit in as next multiple of 40 is 80, which would have >75..
and 7m = 8n....
so 7*40 = 8n......n =35


that is why suff..
avatar
Storm9
Joined: 20 May 2014
Last visit: 16 Jul 2017
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
4
 [4]
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 8
Kudos: 4
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The question is asking for a specific value of n.
Statement 1: This is a ratio, so clearly insufficient.
Statement 2: Another ratio, you don't know m and this statement says nothing about n.

1+2: From statement 1: \(m = \frac{8}{7}n\) and using statement 2: Intersection contains: \(0.4(\frac{8}{7}n)\) elements. Doesn't really tell you anything about n, so answer is E.
If you look at it from a higher level both statements give you some sort of ratio info, while the question is asking for a value. You can't get a value from just ratio info.
avatar
NYCBS19
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Last visit: 13 Jan 2017
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Location: United States
Products:
Posts: 22
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u

if we say we were told m <75.. we would have got our answer

Great explanation, thank you!

However, I have one question about the above quoted bit...

After combining both statements, we know that
M---> Multiple of 7 AND a multiple of 5
N---> Multiple of 8
M/N are in the ratio of 8/7... So for ex if M = 7 x 5, then N= 8 x 5 (giving us values of M=35 and N=40)

Using this logic, we can have M= 7 x 10 , then N= 8 x 10 (giving us values of M=70 and N=80)

Therefore even if we were given m<75, we will still have 2 values..??

I think I am misunderstanding something maybe, can you please help to point out my misunderstanding?

Thanks :)
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Nov 2024
Posts: 11,445
Own Kudos:
37,849
 [1]
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 11,445
Kudos: 37,849
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
18967mba
chetan2u

if we say we were told m <75.. we would have got our answer

Great explanation, thank you!

However, I have one question about the above quoted bit...

After combining both statements, we know that
M---> Multiple of 7 AND a multiple of 5
N---> Multiple of 8
M/N are in the ratio of 8/7... So for ex if M = 7 x 5, then N= 8 x 5 (giving us values of M=35 and N=40)

Using this logic, we can have M= 7 x 10 , then N= 8 x 10 (giving us values of M=70 and N=80)

Therefore even if we were given m<75, we will still have 2 values..??

I think I am misunderstanding something maybe, can you please help to point out my misunderstanding?

Thanks :)

Hi,
you have understood the method but going wrong on inference from 7m=8n...
This tells us that n and NOT m, is multiple of7.....
M is s multiple of 8, as m= n*8/7....so n is multiple of 7
avatar
rcaraujo20
Joined: 24 Sep 2017
Last visit: 30 Aug 2021
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
42
 [3]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Spain
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
WE:General Management (Computer Software)
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello,

Another way to see the second statement:
(1) m : n = 8 : 7
(2) Think about groups, so: m + (n - 0.4m) = T (total of elements) => 0.6m + n = T

(1-2) Substitute (1) in (2): 0.6 x 8n/7 = T
n and T are variables, but we have just one equation to solve it. Hence, insufficient.

Best,
User avatar
minustark
Joined: 14 Jul 2019
Last visit: 01 Apr 2021
Posts: 472
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 52
Status:Student
Location: United States
Concentration: Accounting, Finance
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V35
GPA: 3.9
WE:Education (Accounting)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V35
Posts: 472
Kudos: 373
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Together, when m has to be a multiple of 5 and n has to produce an integer when 7m is divided by 8. Again many answers are possible for this condition, like m = 40, n= 35. or m =80, n=70.

E is the answer.
User avatar
Kritisood
Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Last visit: 19 Jul 2023
Posts: 502
Own Kudos:
1,143
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,091
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Posts: 502
Kudos: 1,143
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
minustark

Together, when m has to be a multiple of 5 and n has to produce an integer when 7m is divided by 8. Again many answers are possible for this condition, like m = 40, n= 35. or m =80, n=70.

E is the answer.

Could please explain this point further?

Why if m is a multiple of 5 ALSO n must be a multiple of 5? VeritasKarishma
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 05 Dec 2024
Posts: 15,532
Own Kudos:
70,050
 [3]
Given Kudos: 449
Location: Pune, India
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,532
Kudos: 70,050
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Genoa2000
minustark

Together, when m has to be a multiple of 5 and n has to produce an integer when 7m is divided by 8. Again many answers are possible for this condition, like m = 40, n= 35. or m =80, n=70.

E is the answer.

Could please explain this point further?

Why if m is a multiple of 5 ALSO n must be a multiple of 5? VeritasKarishma

Given m and n are integers,

If 7m = 8n,
7 * m = 2^3 * n

m must have 2^3 in it and n must have 7. Now, if m is a multiple of any other prime number, n must be a multiple of that prime number too.

If m = 2^3 * 5,
n = 7 * 5

If m = 2^3 * 11
n = 7 * 11

Only then can both sides of the equations be same.
User avatar
Gmatboat
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 21 Jun 2022
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 290
Posts: 11
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
Gurshaans
Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively. What is the value of n?

(1) 7m=8n
(2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements.

But lets see what each statements tells us..


May be helpful in some other Q..
(1) 7m=8n
m is a multiple of 8 and n is a multiple of 7


Could any experts please explain the highlighted part? I am confused. I understand that if we were told m= 8*(some integer n), then we can deduce that m is a multiple of '8'. However, in this case, how can we deduce that 'm' is a multiple of 8? if we re-arrange the formula, we get m = 8/7 * n (how is this a multiple of 8?). At best, the equation looks like m = multiple of 8/7.

ScottTargetTestPrep JeffTargetTestPrep BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 13 May 2024
Posts: 6,786
Own Kudos:
32,137
 [4]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert reply
Posts: 6,786
Kudos: 32,137
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gmatboat
chetan2u
Gurshaans
Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively. What is the value of n?

(1) 7m=8n
(2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements.

But lets see what each statements tells us..


May be helpful in some other Q..
(1) 7m=8n
m is a multiple of 8 and n is a multiple of 7


Could any experts please explain the highlighted part? I am confused. I understand that if we were told m= 8*(some integer n), then we can deduce that m is a multiple of '8'. However, in this case, how can we deduce that 'm' is a multiple of 8? if we re-arrange the formula, we get m = 8/7 * n (how is this a multiple of 8?). At best, the equation looks like m = multiple of 8/7.

ScottTargetTestPrep JeffTargetTestPrep BrentGMATPrepNow


The key piece of information here is that m and n are integers.
If 7m = 8n, then the prime factorization of both sides should be equal.
That is: (7)(m) = (2)(2)(2)(n)
We can see that, in order for the equation to hold true, m must have at least three 2's in its prime factorization, and n must have at least one 7 in its prime factorization.
If m has at least three 2's in its prime factorization, then m is a multiple of 8
If n has at least one 7 in its prime factorization, then n is a multiple of 7

Does that help?
User avatar
ShubhangiGoel
Joined: 30 Sep 2021
Last visit: 05 Dec 2024
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Lettherebelight
Sets M and N contain exactly m and n elements, respectively. What is the value of n?

(1) 7m=8n
(2) The intersection of M and N contains exactly 0.4m elements.


can we solve it using below approach

M U N= m+ 7m/8-0.4m +neither

insufficient
Moderator:
Math Expert
97566 posts