Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
TTP GMAT OnDemand gives serious students 400+ hours of expert video instruction, the full TTP course, AI support, weekly office hours, and a 715+ score guarantee—all built for elite GMAT score improvement.
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Master the GMAT with expert live instruction, a personalized study plan, and real-time support. Includes 40 hours of online classes plus 6 months of access to the TTP GMAT OnDemand video course. Class date: Mon/Wed June 22, 2026 →August 26, 2026
A recent study found that cities with extensive bike lane networks tend to have lower levels of traffic congestion compared to cities with fewer bike lanes. Based on this, a city planner argues that expanding bike lanes in a congested city will necessarily lead to a significant reduction in traffic congestion.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the city planner’s argument?
(A) Many cities with extensive bike lane networks also have strong public transportation systems that contribute to reduced congestion.
(B) Expanding bike lanes requires reducing the number of lanes available for cars, which could initially increase congestion.
(C) A survey found that only a small percentage of residents in congested cities are willing to switch from cars to bicycles for their daily commute.
(D) In some cities, bike lanes are underutilized because of weather conditions and terrain, leading to no measurable impact on congestion.
(E) The cost of expanding bike lane networks varies widely depending on the city's existing infrastructure.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Can someone please explain to me how or why the answer is C? A looks like the best answer as C is making an assumption that the congestion is caused by cars which the passage never mentioned.
I assume you chose A. If you're wondering why A is incorrect, consider this: What if people show a strong preference for switching from cars rather than bikes? In that case, the number of cars would decrease, reducing congestion and freeing up road space. However, if people are not interested in switching from cars in the first place, the plan would fail. That's why the correct answer is C
Success2003
Can someone please explain to me how or why the answer is C? A looks like the best answer as C is making an assumption that the congestion is caused by cars which the passage never mentioned.
"strong public transportation systems that contribute to reduced congestion." doesnt lead to the fact that extensive bike system doesnt reduce the traffic. extensive bike system can still reduce the traffic and its fine if strong public transportation systems helps too.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.