The key concept here is Inverse Proportionality — when price ∝ 1/d3, doubling the diameter makes a lens 8× cheaper, not 2×. That asymmetry is exactly what this problem is testing.
Step 1: Set up the price formula
Since price is inversely proportional to the cube of diameter:
Price = k/d3, where k is a constant.
Step 2: Calculate Alpha Optics' total spend
30 lenses, each with diameter 6 mm:
Total = 30 × k/63 = 30k/216
Step 3: Calculate Beta Vision's total spend
- 30 lenses at d = 3 mm: 30 × k/27 = 30k/27
- 30 lenses at d = 2 mm: 30 × k/8 = 30k/8
- 30 lenses at d = 1 mm: 30 × k/1 = 30k
Add them up using common denominator 216:
30k/27 = 240k/216
30k/8 = 810k/216
30k = 6480k/216
Beta Total = (240 + 810 + 6480)k/216 = 7530k/216
Step 4: Find the ratio
Beta/Alpha = (7530k/216) ÷ (30k/216) = 7530/30 = 251
Answer: D. 251
The common trap: Most students compute 30 × (1/33 + 1/23 + 1/13) but then divide by 1/63 without noticing the 30s cancel cleanly — leading to arithmetic errors mid-way. Just keep everything over 216 and it falls apart nicely.
Takeaway: When a problem says "inversely proportional to the cube," the small-diameter lenses are disproportionately expensive — always cube first, then compute totals.