Answer: (D) 320
Key Concept: Proportionality — translating a word relationship into a formula, then applying it as a ratio.
The first instinct many students have here is to set up a table or guess-and-check with numbers. The trap is spending time computing exact values of I for Albor, then trying to match Brondon. You don't need I's actual value at all — you only need the condition that the two I values are equal.
Step 1: Write the proportionality formula.
"I is proportional to the cube root of population and inversely proportional to the square root of health districts" translates to:
I = k × ∛(population) / √(districts)
where k is a constant that is the same for every city in Turlandia.
Step 2: Set up the equal-indicator condition.
Since I is the same for Albor and Brondon:
k × ∛(125,000) / √(20) = k × ∛(8,000,000) / √(d)
The k cancels immediately:
∛(125,000) / √(20) = ∛(8,000,000) / √(d)
Step 3: Compute the cube roots.
∛(125,000) = ∛(125 × 1,000) = 5 × 10 = 50
∛(8,000,000) = ∛(8 × 1,000,000) = 2 × 100 = 200
So the equation becomes:
50 / √(20) = 200 / √(d)
Step 4: Solve for √(d), then d.
Cross-multiply:
50 × √(d) = 200 × √(20)
√(d) = 4 × √(20)
d = 16 × 20 = 320
Answer: (D)
Common trap: Students who compute ∛(8,000,000) as 20 (confusing cube root with the square root of 400, since √400 = 20) end up with d = 80, which is answer choice (B). If you are getting 80, check your cube root.
Takeaway: When a GMAT word problem gives you a "proportional to / inversely proportional to" relationship, immediately write I = k × (formula), set up the ratio condition, and let k cancel — you almost never need to find k's actual value.