Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 21:16 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 21:16
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
Millis79
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Last visit: 16 Feb 2019
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
45
 [5]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 8
Kudos: 45
 [5]
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
pradeepss
Joined: 19 Sep 2008
Last visit: 21 Dec 2014
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 257
Status:Please do not forget to give kudos if you like my post
Location: United States (CA)
Posts: 68
Kudos: 213
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
79,413
 [3]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,413
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,847
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,847
Kudos: 9,184
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Millis79
All,

I need some assistance on the below question:

Is A+2B < C + 2D?

(1) A < C
(2) D > B


Statement I is insufficient as it does not say anything about B and D. Same goes for statement II.
Combining is sufficient:

Since C is greater than A and D is greater than B we can say that A + 2B < C + 2D
User avatar
priyamne
Joined: 24 Apr 2012
Last visit: 15 Feb 2014
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 36
Kudos: 54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is A+2B < C + 2D?

(1) A < C
(2) D > B

Clearly, the two statements individually are not sufficient. We just need to check if these together help us to answer the question or not.
Equation 1: A<C
Equation 2: B<D

Multiplying equation 2 by 2 and adding equation 1, we get:
A+2B < C + 2D

Hence, the two statements combined are sufficient to answer.
Option C

Thanks & Regards,
Sumiti Singh
Mnemonic Education Pvt Ltd
[email protected]
avatar
samsmalldog
Joined: 26 Jan 2014
Last visit: 20 Sep 2014
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 77
Posts: 33
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tricky one, if you miss the GT or LT sign, you probably will be trapped, C is the right answer.
User avatar
GmatFear
Joined: 30 Jul 2014
Last visit: 29 Apr 2015
Posts: 9
Posts: 9
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I ran into this problem while studying and I'm quite confused as to why you double the second statement once you combine the two. I understand how to get here a+b<c+d but do not understand why you double "b" and "d". This seems random to me and looks like it's only done to match the target question. Couldn't I double "a" and "c" also if I wanted to?

The explanation in the MGMAT book isn't helping me because it just tells you to double "b" and "d" or multiply them by 2 once you combine them but why??? Is there a rule or guideline to follow?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,413
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GmatFear
I ran into this problem while studying and I'm quite confused as to why you double the second statement once you combine the two. I understand how to get here a+b<c+d but do not understand why you double "b" and "d". This seems random to me and looks like it's only done to match the target question. Couldn't I double "a" and "c" also if I wanted to?

The explanation in the MGMAT book isn't helping me because it just tells you to double "b" and "d" or multiply them by 2 once you combine them but why??? Is there a rule or guideline to follow?

If you have an equation, can you multiply it by 2 on both sides without changing it? Sure.
x = 5
2x = 10

When you have an inequality, you can multiply it by a positive number on both sides without changing it.
x < 5
2x < 10
No matter what x is, if x is less than 5, 2x will be less than 10.

The question stem deals with 2B and 2D. So given that B < D, it implies that 2B must be less than 2D i.e. 2B < 2D. This helps us arrive at our answer. We can manipulate equations/inequalities to help us arrive at the answer.

You could double A and C too (2A < 2C) but that wouldn't help you get to the answer. You manipulate equations/inequalities (without changing them) to get what you want.
User avatar
GmatFear
Joined: 30 Jul 2014
Last visit: 29 Apr 2015
Posts: 9
Posts: 9
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma
GmatFear
I ran into this problem while studying and I'm quite confused as to why you double the second statement once you combine the two. I understand how to get here a+b<c+d but do not understand why you double "b" and "d". This seems random to me and looks like it's only done to match the target question. Couldn't I double "a" and "c" also if I wanted to?

The explanation in the MGMAT book isn't helping me because it just tells you to double "b" and "d" or multiply them by 2 once you combine them but why??? Is there a rule or guideline to follow?

If you have an equation, can you multiply it by 2 on both sides without changing it? Sure.
x = 5
2x = 10

When you have an inequality, you can multiply it by a positive number on both sides without changing it.
x < 5
2x < 10
No matter what x is, if x is less than 5, 2x will be less than 10.

The question stem deals with 2B and 2D. So given that B < D, it implies that 2B must be less than 2D i.e. 2B < 2D. This helps us arrive at our answer. We can manipulate equations/inequalities to help us arrive at the answer.

You could double A and C too (2A < 2C) but that wouldn't help you get to the answer. You manipulate equations/inequalities (without changing them) to get what you want.

Your explanation makes perfect sense, thank you!
User avatar
DarleneTran
Joined: 31 Dec 2017
Last visit: 30 Mar 2020
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Posts: 50
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A+2B < C + 2D
--> A - C < 2D -2B
--> A - C < 2 (D - B)

(1) A < C
---> A - C < 0 ----> No info about D & B --->NS

(2) D > B
---> D - B > 0 ----->No info about A & C ----> NS

(1) + (2): A - C < D - B and it's obvious that A - C < 2 (D - B)
--->The answer is C
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,986
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,986
Kudos: 1,118
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109830 posts
498 posts
212 posts