Bunuel
If sequence \(x_1, \ x_2, \ x_3, \ ..., \ x_n\) is such that \(x_{n+1}\) is 5 more than \(x_n\) for \(n > \)0, does \(x_{99}\) have a unit’s digit of 9?
(1) The 100th term plus 1 is a multiple of 5.
(2) The first term is 4.
Given: \(x_1, \ x_2, \ x_3, \ ..., \ x_n\) is such that \(x_{n+1}\) is 5 more than \(x_n\) for \(n > \)0 Let's list a few terms to get a better idea of the sequence.
First, let k = the first term (\(x_1\)) to get:
\(x_1 = k\)
\(x_2 = k+5\)
\(x_3 = k+5+5\)
\(x_4 = k+5+5+5\)
\(x_5 = k+5+5+5+5\)
notice that the number of 5's in the sum is 1 less than the term numberThis means \(x_n = k+5(n-1)\)Target question: Does \(x_{99}\) have a unit’s digit of 9? Statement 1: The 100th term plus 1 is a multiple of 5. From our earlier work we know that \(x_{100} = k+5(100-1) = k + 495\)
So, it COULD be the case that \(k = 4\), which means \(x_{100} = 4 + 495 = 499\), and \(499 + 1 = 500\), which is a multiple of \(5\). In this case, \(x_{99} = x_{100} - 5 = 499 - 5 = 494\). So, the answer to the target question is
NO, \(x_{99}\) does not have units digit 9 However, it could also be the case that, \(k = 9\), which means \(x_{100} = 9 + 495 = 504\), and \(504 + 1 = 505\), which is a multiple of \(5\). In this case, \(x_{99} = x_{100} - 5 = 504 - 5 = 499\). So, the answer to the target question is
YES, \(x_{99}\) does have units digit 9 Since we can’t answer the
target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: The first term is 4.In other words, \(k = 5\), which means \(x_99 = 4+5(99-1) = 494\)[/b].
So, the answer to the target question is
NO, \(x_{99}\) does not have units digit 9 Since we can answer the
target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer: B
Cheers,
Brent