Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 1101:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Jun 1111:00 AM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
TTP GMAT OnDemand gives serious students 400+ hours of expert video instruction, the full TTP course, AI support, weekly office hours, and a 715+ score guarantee—all built for elite GMAT score improvement.
Jun 1006:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
Jun 1312:30 AM EDT
-01:00 AM EDT
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Jun 1603:00 PM PDT
-04:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Jun 2207:30 PM EDT
-09:30 PM EDT
Master the GMAT with expert live instruction, a personalized study plan, and real-time support. Includes 40 hours of online classes plus 6 months of access to the TTP GMAT OnDemand video course. Class date: Mon/Wed June 22, 2026 →August 26, 2026
13 Mar 2026, 05:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
A large pet-food manufacturer currently uses pork meal as the main protein-supplying ingredient in its most popular dog food. In order to cut costs, the manufacturer plans to switch from pork meal to a mixture of equal amounts of this pork meal and of chicken meal, which currently costs 20 percent less per pound than pork meal.
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the viability of the pet-food manufacturer’s plan?
A. Dogs are proportionately more likely to experience allergic reactions from eating chicken meal than from eating pork meal.
B. Because its market segment is rapidly becoming more competitive, the manufacturer will almost certainly have to lower the price per pound of its products to retain its market share.
C. Chicken meal of the grade used for pet foods has a shorter shelf life than does the comparable grade of pork meal.
D. If the proposed change is implemented, the resulting change in overall demand would cause the wholesale market price of chicken meal to rise.
E. Chicken meal is more fuel-efficient for the manufacturer to process into pet food than is pork meal.
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the viability of the pet-food manufacturer’s plan?
A. Dogs are proportionately more likely to experience allergic reactions from eating chicken meal than from eating pork meal.
B. Because its market segment is rapidly becoming more competitive, the manufacturer will almost certainly have to lower the price per pound of its products to retain its market share.
C. Chicken meal of the grade used for pet foods has a shorter shelf life than does the comparable grade of pork meal.
D. If the proposed change is implemented, the resulting change in overall demand would cause the wholesale market price of chicken meal to rise.
E. Chicken meal is more fuel-efficient for the manufacturer to process into pet food than is pork meal.
13 Mar 2026, 05:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
A large pet-food manufacturer currently uses pork meal as the main protein-supplying ingredient in its most popular dog food. In order to cut costs, the manufacturer plans to switch from pork meal to a mixture of equal amounts of this pork meal and of chicken meal, which currently costs 20 percent less per pound than pork meal.
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the viability of the pet-food manufacturer’s plan?
A. Dogs are proportionately more likely to experience allergic reactions from eating chicken meal than from eating pork meal.
B. Because its market segment is rapidly becoming more competitive, the manufacturer will almost certainly have to lower the price per pound of its products to retain its market share.
C. Chicken meal of the grade used for pet foods has a shorter shelf life than does the comparable grade of pork meal.
D. If the proposed change is implemented, the resulting change in overall demand would cause the wholesale market price of chicken meal to rise.
E. Chicken meal is more fuel-efficient for the manufacturer to process into pet food than is pork meal.
First, we need to understand the specific point of the manufacturer’s plan.
This is stated at the beginning of the second sentence—to cut costs.
Therefore, to CAST DOUBT on the viability of this plan, we need a reason why manufacturing costs may NOT decrease from their current level if the change from all-pork to half-pork, half-chicken is implemented.
A. An increase in allergic reactions could conceivably affect the manufacturer’s market share, but neither such reactions nor anything else experienced by the end-user could possibly affect manufacturing costs. This consideration is irrelevant.
B. If market developments force the manufacturer to start selling at a lower unit price, then its revenues per unit (per pound)—but not its costs—will go down. This consideration is irrelevant to the cost side of the balance sheet.
C. No reason is given to suspect that shelf-life issues might affect manufacturing costs, so this consideration is irrelevant.
D. The basis of the manufacturer’s planning is the lower current cost of chicken meal. If the change in demand inherent in its plan will push the wholesale price of chicken meal up towards the current price of pork meal, then that effect will erode the manufacturer’s anticipated cost savings.
E. If this statement is true, then chicken meal will be not only cheaper for the manufacturer to purchase at wholesale, but also cheaper to process into its final product! This consideration therefore gives a further reason why the manufacturer’s plan should lower costs—i.e., it strengthens the argument. That’s the opposite of what we want.
Answer: D
A large pet-food manufacturer currently uses pork meal as the main protein-supplying ingredient in its most popular dog food. In order to cut costs, the manufacturer plans to switch from pork meal to a mixture of equal amounts of this pork meal and of chicken meal, which currently costs 20 percent less per pound than pork meal.
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the viability of the pet-food manufacturer’s plan?
A. Dogs are proportionately more likely to experience allergic reactions from eating chicken meal than from eating pork meal.
B. Because its market segment is rapidly becoming more competitive, the manufacturer will almost certainly have to lower the price per pound of its products to retain its market share.
C. Chicken meal of the grade used for pet foods has a shorter shelf life than does the comparable grade of pork meal.
D. If the proposed change is implemented, the resulting change in overall demand would cause the wholesale market price of chicken meal to rise.
E. Chicken meal is more fuel-efficient for the manufacturer to process into pet food than is pork meal.
First, we need to understand the specific point of the manufacturer’s plan.
This is stated at the beginning of the second sentence—to cut costs.
Therefore, to CAST DOUBT on the viability of this plan, we need a reason why manufacturing costs may NOT decrease from their current level if the change from all-pork to half-pork, half-chicken is implemented.
A. An increase in allergic reactions could conceivably affect the manufacturer’s market share, but neither such reactions nor anything else experienced by the end-user could possibly affect manufacturing costs. This consideration is irrelevant.
B. If market developments force the manufacturer to start selling at a lower unit price, then its revenues per unit (per pound)—but not its costs—will go down. This consideration is irrelevant to the cost side of the balance sheet.
C. No reason is given to suspect that shelf-life issues might affect manufacturing costs, so this consideration is irrelevant.
D. The basis of the manufacturer’s planning is the lower current cost of chicken meal. If the change in demand inherent in its plan will push the wholesale price of chicken meal up towards the current price of pork meal, then that effect will erode the manufacturer’s anticipated cost savings.
E. If this statement is true, then chicken meal will be not only cheaper for the manufacturer to purchase at wholesale, but also cheaper to process into its final product! This consideration therefore gives a further reason why the manufacturer’s plan should lower costs—i.e., it strengthens the argument. That’s the opposite of what we want.
Answer: D
curatelycurious
Joined: 24 Jan 2026
Last visit: 10 Jun 2026
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: Simon '26 (A)
GPA: 8.5
Products:
08 Jun 2026, 18:07
Kudos
Bookmarks
Okay, I get why D is correct but why is A incorrect?
My logic behind choosing A was that it directly mentions that people would not buy it, so the plan is not viable anymore and the company lose on its sales.
The angle of costs is already mentioned in the passage that yes it would reduce cost but viability comes into play that the whole plan should work.
My logic behind choosing A was that it directly mentions that people would not buy it, so the plan is not viable anymore and the company lose on its sales.
The angle of costs is already mentioned in the passage that yes it would reduce cost but viability comes into play that the whole plan should work.
