Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 14:52 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 14:52
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
sterny
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Last visit: 23 Feb 2011
Posts: 162
Own Kudos:
182
Schools:Wharton
Posts: 162
Kudos: 182
How do interviews factor in? Updated on: 12 Nov 2008, 11:07
Originally posted by sterny on 12 Nov 2008, 11:01.
Last edited by sterny on 12 Nov 2008, 11:07, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
So I have applied to Columbia, Wharton, Yale, Stern and Cornell.

I have so far recieved interview invites from Columbia, Wharton and Cornell. I am still waiting on Yale and Stern. I just had my Columbia interview last week and I am confused.

The interview was fairly informal and I cannot understand how candidates can be cut out after the interview process. If I am not wrong about 30-40% of the candidates get interviewed and about 30-40% of those that get interviewed should recieve acceptances.

My questions is, that since most of the interviews are blind to the application essays, and frankly not in-depth how can someone be rejected after the interview? Does the commitee go BACK to the application and review it before making the final decision? Or is the final decision completely dependent on the interview go/no-go result?

I just find the interview process a little arbitrary and almost feel like it holds lesser weight than indicated. But if that is indeed the case, then why even do the interview?

OK I am confused - anyone else know from experience the value of interviews? Can a good interview save a mediocre app..or vice versa?
User avatar
solaris1
User avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 1,431
Own Kudos:
223
Given Kudos: 22
Concentration: General Management
Schools:NYU Stern '11
Posts: 1,431
Kudos: 223
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 11:05
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sterny
Does the commitee go BACK to the application and review it before making the final decision?
Show more

Yes.
User avatar
IHateTheGMAT
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Last visit: 25 Jul 2011
Posts: 623
Own Kudos:
61
Concentration: Investment Banking or Investment Management
Posts: 623
Kudos: 61
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 11:05
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Personally (and based on absouletely no evidence) I tend to think that at most schools the interview is probably worth less than the written application.

I'm very interested in what others have to say on this topic...
User avatar
Rubashov1
User avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Last visit: 29 Sep 2016
Posts: 866
Own Kudos:
107
Given Kudos: 15
Schools:Kellogg '10
Posts: 866
Kudos: 107
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 11:13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
solaris1
sterny
Does the commitee go BACK to the application and review it before making the final decision?

Yes.
Show more

I always assumed this to be the case, and it scares the crap out of me. :cry:
User avatar
terp26
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Last visit: 06 Apr 2020
Posts: 1,210
Own Kudos:
380
Given Kudos: 12
Schools:Chicago Booth '11
Posts: 1,210
Kudos: 380
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 11:16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sterny
So I have applied to Columbia, Wharton, Yale, Stern and Cornell.

I have so far recieved interview invites from Columbia, Wharton and Cornell. I am still waiting on Yale and Stern. I just had my Columbia interview last week and I am confused.

The interview was fairly informal and I cannot understand how candidates can be cut out after the interview process. If I am not wrong about 30-40% of the candidates get interviewed and about 30-40% of those that get interviewed should recieve acceptances.

My questions is, that since most of the interviews are blind to the application essays, and frankly not in-depth how can someone be rejected after the interview? Does the commitee go BACK to the application and review it before making the final decision? Or is the final decision completely dependent on the interview go/no-go result?

I just find the interview process a little arbitrary and almost feel like it holds lesser weight than indicated. But if that is indeed the case, then why even do the interview?

OK I am confused - anyone else know from experience the value of interviews? Can a good interview save a mediocre app..or vice versa?
Show more

Interview is just another datapoint as they say. It is not a go or no-go thing. They go back and review all the apps again, this time with the interview.
User avatar
Tarmac
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Last visit: 12 Sep 2011
Posts: 431
Own Kudos:
71
Given Kudos: 2
Location: USA
Schools:Tepper '11
Posts: 431
Kudos: 71
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 11:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The interview is also to uncover frauds, and people who have a hard time communicating in English (essays were ghost-written).

Although, I have met some people at info sessions, alum and current students at the highest of tier schools, who have terrible English skills. :lol:
User avatar
cereal255
User avatar
Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Last visit: 04 Mar 2022
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
17
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Buffalo, NY
Concentration: Accounting/Finance
Schools:Simon '11
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V47
Posts: 177
Kudos: 17
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 11:21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'm of the opinion that the interview is much like the GMAT in many ways. It won't get you in by itself but it may keep you out.

A whole lot of the B-School recruiting process is the ability to "schmooze" with recruiters, get along with your classmates and work in teams with those around you. I think that the interview is to get a sense of these qualities that you just can't get from reading someone's essays and looking at their resume. It's my opinion that a lot the interview is just to see if this person is a complete jerk or not and if they can express their plans well.

Lots of people with great numbers are either really huge dorks in person or are completely arrogant and won't get along well with their classmates. The interview gives a different perspective on how this person "plays with others" in a relatively stressful situation with an unknown person, much like it will be during recruiting and through most of the first semster as we're all feeling our way through. If you fall into the extremes of one of these types it's probably to the ding pile even if the rest of your app is stellar.

I agree (hope) that the rest of the application (Essays, GMAT, WE) is worth more than the interview since I never come across well in interviews.

Also, the above is just opinion so take it as you will.
avatar
Virflo
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Last visit: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
19
 [2]
Posts: 75
Kudos: 19
 [2]
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 12:33
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A friend of mine who conducts interviews for Kellog confirmed that interviews really do not play a big part in the selection process. He told me that on a few occasions, he strongly advised the admissions people NOT to accept an applicant and he/she was accepted, and (unfortunately) the other way around as well....
User avatar
terp26
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Last visit: 06 Apr 2020
Posts: 1,210
Own Kudos:
380
Given Kudos: 12
Schools:Chicago Booth '11
Posts: 1,210
Kudos: 380
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 12:55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Virflo
A friend of mine who conducts interviews for Kellog confirmed that interviews really do not play a big part in the selection process. He told me that on a few occasions, he strongly advised the admissions people NOT to accept an applicant and he/she was accepted, and (unfortunately) the other way around as well....
Show more

that takes a lot of the pressure off, thanks
User avatar
sam77sam7
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Last visit: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 597
Own Kudos:
30
Location: Detroit, MI
Concentration: Consulting
Posts: 597
Kudos: 30
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 13:08
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am curious as to what type of form is filled out by the 2nd year student interviewers or alumni interviewers...

Do they fill out a grid form with 1-10 scales, or write a statement about the candidate?

~Sam
avatar
bball
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Last visit: 27 Jul 2011
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Schools:HBS '11
Posts: 112
Kudos: 5
 [1]
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 13:50
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Virflo
A friend of mine who conducts interviews for Kellog confirmed that interviews really do not play a big part in the selection process. He told me that on a few occasions, he strongly advised the admissions people NOT to accept an applicant and he/she was accepted, and (unfortunately) the other way around as well....
Show more

This might be specific to Kellogg though since they interview every applicant (am I correct?). I can easily see that if they interview everyone, that it wouldn't count much. However, for a place like HBS that only interviews 20% of its applicants and all interviews are conducted by adcom, I have to believe it counts for more. I do believe Kellogg and HBS are at the opposite ends of the spectrum though.
User avatar
AlbertNTN
User avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Last visit: 12 May 2012
Posts: 126
Own Kudos:
144
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Wharton '14 (D) Booth '14 (D) Tuck '14 (WL) Sloan '14 (D) CBS '14 (D) Darden '14 (A)
Schools: Wharton '14 (D) Booth '14 (D) Tuck '14 (WL) Sloan '14 (D) CBS '14 (D) Darden '14 (A)
Posts: 126
Kudos: 144
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 15:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tarmac
The interview is also to uncover frauds, and people who have a hard time communicating in English (essays were ghost-written).

Although, I have met some people at info sessions, alum and current students at the highest of tier schools, who have terrible English skills. :lol:
Show more

Just wonder how bad it is :twisted:

perhaps weight of interview depends on individual school's policy. I think that one important part is to verify our written stuffs and see how u response (comm skills/characteristics blah blah).
Maybe current MBA students can answer this question much better :lol: ... interesting topic
User avatar
msday
User avatar
Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Last visit: 09 Jul 2014
Posts: 515
Own Kudos:
64
Given Kudos: 28
Concentration: General Management
Schools:Harvard '11
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V48
Posts: 515
Kudos: 64
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 15:55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bball
Virflo
A friend of mine who conducts interviews for Kellog confirmed that interviews really do not play a big part in the selection process. He told me that on a few occasions, he strongly advised the admissions people NOT to accept an applicant and he/she was accepted, and (unfortunately) the other way around as well....

This might be specific to Kellogg though since they interview every applicant (am I correct?). I can easily see that if they interview everyone, that it wouldn't count much. However, for a place like HBS that only interviews 20% of its applicants and all interviews are conducted by adcom, I have to believe it counts for more. I do believe Kellogg and HBS are at the opposite ends of the spectrum though.
Show more

bball i believe you are right on. kellogg interviews >90% of applicants. HBS (assuming ~4000 R1 apps), interviews 850, or about 20% of applicants. Of those 850, it can offer admission to approximately 450 (again, assuming a 450/450/100 split by round). So, 450/850 = ~53% chance mathematically.

The reality (I think) is that each candidate walks into the interview with either a "Ding" or "Accept" over his/her head. The interview is just the final data point to make sure that the adcom's initial judgment is correct. Just my opinion, however.
User avatar
irishspring
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Last visit: 08 Jun 2011
Posts: 176
Own Kudos:
60
Concentration: Consulting, International Business
Schools:Harvard (No Interview), Cornell (Accepted), Duke (Accepted), Northwestern (Dinged)
Posts: 176
Kudos: 60
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 16:13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What are signs your interview went well?
User avatar
egy
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Nov 2008
Last visit: 15 Feb 2014
Posts: 254
Own Kudos:
72
 [1]
Given Kudos: 12
Schools:Booth 2012
Posts: 254
Kudos: 72
 [1]
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 16:22
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Admission! :wink:

irishspring
What are signs your interview went well?
Show more
User avatar
terry12
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Last visit: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 313
Own Kudos:
69
Concentration: Healthcare
Schools:Attending Stanford
Posts: 313
Kudos: 69
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 16:32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
irishspring
What are signs your interview went well?
Show more
Don't try to gauge whether your interview went well or not. I know this is much easier said than done, but trying to gauge an interviewer is pretty challenging. Some are "nice" interviewers, some are "intense" interviewers, and some manage to strike a personal connection with pretty much everyone they meet. Discerning what your interviewer's baseline state is, and determining how he/she reacted to you, is damn near impossible. Do your best, write a thank you note (email is fine if an email/business card is offered- again, this isn't a sign of anything), and start waiting :-D
User avatar
Yahsek
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Last visit: 13 Feb 2014
Posts: 533
Own Kudos:
415
Given Kudos: 34
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Concentration: Sustainable Development
Schools:Ross '12 (MBA/MS)
Posts: 533
Kudos: 415
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 16:48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
terry12
irishspring
What are signs your interview went well?
Don't try to gauge whether your interview went well or not. I know this is much easier said than done, but trying to gauge an interviewer is pretty challenging. Some are "nice" interviewers, some are "intense" interviewers, and some manage to strike a personal connection with pretty much everyone they meet. Discerning what your interviewer's baseline state is, and determining how he/she reacted to you, is damn near impossible. Do your best, write a thank you note (email is fine if an email/business card is offered- again, this isn't a sign of anything), and start waiting :-D
Show more
I try my best to do this but It's just so friggin' difficult. Often times, your last opportunity to make a good impression on a school is via the interview, so it's hard not to constantly think about how you did. I've had 3 interviews thus far, and I feel like they've all been not great but not horrible at the same time. The suspense is killing me!!! :shocked
avatar
gt7er
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Last visit: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 76
Posts: 76
Kudos: 0
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 16:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
msday86
bball
Virflo
A friend of mine who conducts interviews for Kellog confirmed that interviews really do not play a big part in the selection process. He told me that on a few occasions, he strongly advised the admissions people NOT to accept an applicant and he/she was accepted, and (unfortunately) the other way around as well....

This might be specific to Kellogg though since they interview every applicant (am I correct?). I can easily see that if they interview everyone, that it wouldn't count much. However, for a place like HBS that only interviews 20% of its applicants and all interviews are conducted by adcom, I have to believe it counts for more. I do believe Kellogg and HBS are at the opposite ends of the spectrum though.

bball i believe you are right on. kellogg interviews >90% of applicants. HBS (assuming ~4000 R1 apps), interviews 850, or about 20% of applicants. Of those 850, it can offer admission to approximately 450 (again, assuming a 450/450/100 split by round). So, 450/850 = ~53% chance mathematically.

The reality (I think) is that each candidate walks into the interview with either a "Ding" or "Accept" over his/her head. The interview is just the final data point to make sure that the adcom's initial judgment is correct. Just my opinion, however.
Show more


if it's true that they already have a predetermined ding or accept then that's incredibly discouraging....
User avatar
egy
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Nov 2008
Last visit: 15 Feb 2014
Posts: 254
Own Kudos:
72
Given Kudos: 12
Schools:Booth 2012
Posts: 254
Kudos: 72
How do interviews factor in? 12 Nov 2008, 18:31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gt7er

if it's true that they already have a predetermined ding or accept then that's incredibly discouraging....
Show more
If that were the case, why would they interview you? Seems like a waste of resources all around.

Everyone doesn't walk in at the same level, but at the very least, you have something of a chance.
User avatar
emoryhopeful
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Last visit: 05 Mar 2010
Posts: 392
Own Kudos:
48
Location: Atlanta, GA
Concentration: Organization and Management
Schools:Emory class of 2010
Posts: 392
Kudos: 48
How do interviews factor in? 13 Nov 2008, 08:00
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I feel that interviews are used to gauge your fit within the culture of the school, especially if you haven't had much interaction with current students, alumni, or admissions already throughout the process. If the school is big on fit, I think the interview holds a little more weight. If the school is more concerned with the stats they pump out every year, the interview won't hold as much value.
 1   2