It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 17:44

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# 2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 45

Kudos [?]: 21 [3], given: 7

Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.4
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)

### Show Tags

12 Oct 2012, 23:39
3
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

49% (01:32) correct 51% (01:37) wrong based on 721 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where they stood on the political spectrum. 78% of these individuals described themselves as "moderate" in their political views; however, in the national elections that most closely preceded and followed the poll, over half of the individuals polled voted for candidates far to one end of the political spectrum. It follows that these individuals did not accurately describe their political views.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the above argument relies?
A. Individuals always characterize themselves in keeping with their actual political views.
B. There were no moderate candidates in the national elections preceding and following the poll.
C. Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.
D. Voters can be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time.
E. Many of the polled individuals did not understand what a moderate political view is, and so misdescribed themselves.

I don't understand the explanation of OE. Can you explain in details for me?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 21 [3], given: 7

Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2015
Posts: 119

Kudos [?]: 32 [2], given: 70

GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
Re: 2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2015, 23:22
2
KUDOS
Clearly A and C are contenders. I negated A and thought it was ruining conclusion.

If Individuals DO NOT always characterize themselves in keeping with their actual political views.

then may be at poll, they did not accurately describe their opinion in the 1st place.

Any help ?

Kudos [?]: 32 [2], given: 70

Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2013
Posts: 16

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 19

Re: 2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jun 2013, 17:11
1
KUDOS
Could someone provide the negation of E and why it is wrong?

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 19

Moderator
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1219

Kudos [?]: 1658 [0], given: 116

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2012, 01:06
The conclusion is that the voters did not accurately describe their political views (moderate) based on the fact that the majority voted for an extreme candidate. Since this is an assumption question, we can easily find the answer using LEN method. I'm just going to show it for the right answer for now.

Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.

So, applying LEN, we get something like,
Voters with moderate political views might vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.

This clearly kills the conclusion and its basis because if voters with mooderate political views vote for an extreme politician. Then it would be wrong to say that they did not accurately describe their political views.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Kudos [?]: 1658 [0], given: 116

Director
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 519

Kudos [?]: 335 [0], given: 269

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2012, 20:32
Hi Gamelord

MacFauz has already explained beautifully. Hope you are clear, otherwise visit the link.

article-what-and-how-to-negate-4-exercise-questions-138510.html#p1119593

_________________

First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html

Kudos [?]: 335 [0], given: 269

VP
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1077

Kudos [?]: 646 [0], given: 70

Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2012, 15:34
MacFauz wrote:
The conclusion is that the voters did not accurately describe their political views (moderate) based on the fact that the majority voted for an extreme candidate. Since this is an assumption question, we can easily find the answer using LEN method. I'm just going to show it for the right answer for now.

Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.

So, applying LEN, we get something like,
Voters with moderate political views might vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.
While considering the above negated statement along with the conclusion , you will feel it doesnt kills the conclusion.
If voters might vote for polliticians with extreme thought, than they are doing what conclusion is stating and not the opposite.
Hence it doesnt kills the conclusion.
Pls explain if i have missed something.

This clearly kills the conclusion and its basis because if voters with mooderate political views vote for an extreme politician. Then it would be wrong to say that they did not accurately describe their political views.

C.Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.
D. Voters can be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time.
When we negate D : Voters may not be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time.

Conclusion:It follows that these individuals did not accurately describe their political views.
I think negated option D kills the conclusion, so why should we not select D.

Kudos [?]: 646 [0], given: 70

Moderator
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1219

Kudos [?]: 1658 [0], given: 116

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2012, 21:58
Archit143 wrote:
MacFauz wrote:
The conclusion is that the voters did not accurately describe their political views (moderate) based on the fact that the majority voted for an extreme candidate. Since this is an assumption question, we can easily find the answer using LEN method. I'm just going to show it for the right answer for now.

Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.

So, applying LEN, we get something like,
Voters with moderate political views might vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.
While considering the above negated statement along with the conclusion , you will feel it doesnt kills the conclusion.
If voters might vote for polliticians with extreme thought, than they are doing what conclusion is stating and not the opposite.
Hence it doesnt kills the conclusion.
Pls explain if i have missed something.

This clearly kills the conclusion and its basis because if voters with mooderate political views vote for an extreme politician. Then it would be wrong to say that they did not accurately describe their political views.

C.Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.
D. Voters can be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time.
When we negate D : Voters may not be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time.

Conclusion:It follows that these individuals did not accurately describe their political views.
I think negated option D kills the conclusion, so why should we not select D.

The conclusion says that the voters misrepresented themselves. i.e It means to say that although the voters had said that they had moderate political views, they actually had extreme views.

D) Negating this option does not infact kill the conclusion. I can still argue that voters may not have changed in their views, but that does not necessarily mean that they would vote for the candidate with the same views. eg: I may have conservative views but still I might vote for the Liberal candidate because maybe I feel that he is a nice guy.

C on the other hand does not leave room for this argument and hence is the right answer.

Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Kudos [?]: 1658 [0], given: 116

Intern
Joined: 26 May 2012
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 11

Concentration: Marketing, Statistics
Re: 2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 May 2014, 21:23
Could someone explain why A is wrong?

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 11

Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2015
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 59

Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
GPA: 3.5

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2015, 00:04
sshivanis04 wrote:
Could someone provide the negation of E and why it is wrong?

E - might or might not be true. It is stated that they described themselves supporting X, and in E you are giving a "possible" (one of the many) reason for why they are supporting X.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 59

Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 155

Re: 2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2016, 21:35
2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where they stood on the political spectrum. 78% of these individuals described themselves as "moderate" in their political views; however, in the national elections that most closely preceded and followed the poll, over half of the individuals polled voted for candidates far to one end of the political spectrum. It follows that these individuals did not accurately describe their political views.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the above argument relies?
A. Individuals always characterize themselves in keeping with their actual political views.
B. There were no moderate candidates in the national elections preceding and following the poll.
C. Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.
D. Voters can be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time.
E. Many of the polled individuals did not understand what a moderate political view is, and so misdescribed themselves

Can some one please explain why E) is wrong?
I get that the negation of C works in order to answer the Q?

BUt still not convinced why E) is wrong
_________________

You have to dig deep and find out what it takes to reshuffle the cards life dealt you

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 155

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 484

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 342

Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Re: 2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2016, 22:42
2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where they stood on the political spectrum. 78% of these individuals described themselves as "moderate" in their political views; however, in the national elections that most closely preceded and followed the poll, over half of the individuals polled voted for candidates far to one end of the political spectrum. It follows that these individuals did not accurately describe their political views.

D. Voters can be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time.

I chose C. but if I change D to this :
D. Voters can not be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time. then this can be a correct option. your View pl

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 342

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 484

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 342

Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Re: 2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2016, 22:44
aniketm.87@gmail.com wrote:
2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where they stood on the political spectrum. 78% of these individuals described themselves as "moderate" in their political views; however, in the national elections that most closely preceded and followed the poll, over half of the individuals polled voted for candidates far to one end of the political spectrum. It follows that these individuals did not accurately describe their political views.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the above argument relies?
A. Individuals always characterize themselves in keeping with their actual political views.
B. There were no moderate candidates in the national elections preceding and following the poll.
C. Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.
D. Voters can be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time.
E. Many of the polled individuals did not understand what a moderate political view is, and so misdescribed themselves

Can some one please explain why E) is wrong?
I get that the negation of C works in order to answer the Q?

BUt still not convinced why E) is wrong

E explains the reason why they were incorrect. We already know that they were incorrectly expressed their view. We want to prove that conclusion is not valid, when you negate the assumption.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 342

Intern
Joined: 13 Sep 2015
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 256

Re: 2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2016, 23:18
aniketm.87@gmail.com wrote:
2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where they stood on the political spectrum. 78% of these individuals described themselves as "moderate" in their political views; however, in the national elections that most closely preceded and followed the poll, over half of the individuals polled voted for candidates far to one end of the political spectrum. It follows that these individuals did not accurately describe their political views.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the above argument relies?
A. Individuals always characterize themselves in keeping with their actual political views.
B. There were no moderate candidates in the national elections preceding and following the poll.
C. Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.
D. Voters can be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time.
E. Many of the polled individuals did not understand what a moderate political view is, and so misdescribed themselves

Can some one please explain why E) is wrong?
I get that the negation of C works in order to answer the Q?

BUt still not convinced why E) is wrong

I have the same doubt.

Probably the catch in the sentence is the word 'MANY'. If we flip the sentence to read

Some of the polled individuals understood what a a moderate political view is, and so described themselves correctly.

'SOME' can mean any number from 0-2800. If some of these individuals did describe themselves correctly, it is likely that the 'others' did not, thus the argument can still hold ground.

Please correct me if you see any fault in my thinking process.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 256

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2016
Posts: 268

Kudos [?]: 176 [0], given: 102

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Olin '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.7
WE: General Management (Other)
Re: 2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2016, 13:10
gamelord wrote:
2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where they stood on the political spectrum. 78% of these individuals described themselves as "moderate" in their political views; however, in the national elections that most closely preceded and followed the poll, over half of the individuals polled voted for candidates far to one end of the political spectrum. It follows that these individuals did not accurately describe their political views.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the above argument relies?
A. Individuals always characterize themselves in keeping with their actual political views.
B. There were no moderate candidates in the national elections preceding and following the poll.
C. Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.
D. Voters can be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time.
E. Many of the polled individuals did not understand what a moderate political view is, and so misdescribed themselves.

I don't understand the explanation of OE. Can you explain in details for me?

Only the option C does the intended job. Every other option is either weakening the conclusion or resolving the paradox.

Conclusion: these individuals did not accurately describe their political views.
There are a few assumptions that could have worked - 1. 2500 is big enough a sample. 2. There was nothing that could have changed the voter's mind...

A. Individuals always characterize themselves in keeping with their actual political views.
This is actually Weakening the conclusion.

B. There were no moderate candidates in the national elections preceding and following the poll.
Explaining the reason for shift in votes. Therefore, this option is Resolving the paradox and hence weakening the conclusion again.

C. Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.
Negation Approves this option.

D. Voters can be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time.
Providing the alternate explanation. Therefore, this option is Resolving the paradox and hence weakening the conclusion again.

E. Many of the polled individuals did not understand what a moderate political view is, and so misdescribed themselves.
This option is again Resolving the Paradox. We need an option that would bridge the gap between premise and conclusion; whereas, this option is providing a reason for this disparity in result.
_________________

I'd appreciate learning about the grammatical errors in my posts

Please hit Kudos If my Solution helps

My Debrief for 750 - https://gmatclub.com/forum/from-720-to-750-one-of-the-most-difficult-pleatues-to-overcome-246420.html

My CR notes - https://gmatclub.com/forum/patterns-in-cr-questions-243450.html

Rest of the Notes coming soon.

Kudos [?]: 176 [0], given: 102

Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 155

Re: 2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2016, 22:44
deeksha6 wrote:
aniketm.87@gmail.com wrote:
2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where they stood on the political spectrum. 78% of these individuals described themselves as "moderate" in their political views; however, in the national elections that most closely preceded and followed the poll, over half of the individuals polled voted for candidates far to one end of the political spectrum. It follows that these individuals did not accurately describe their political views.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the above argument relies?
A. Individuals always characterize themselves in keeping with their actual political views.
B. There were no moderate candidates in the national elections preceding and following the poll.
C. Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.
D. Voters can be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time.
E. Many of the polled individuals did not understand what a moderate political view is, and so misdescribed themselves

Can some one please explain why E) is wrong?
I get that the negation of C works in order to answer the Q?

BUt still not convinced why E) is wrong

I have the same doubt.

Probably the catch in the sentence is the word 'MANY'. If we flip the sentence to read

Some of the polled individuals understood what a a moderate political view is, and so described themselves correctly.

'SOME' can mean any number from 0-2800. If some of these individuals did describe themselves correctly, it is likely that the 'others' did not, thus the argument can still hold ground.

Please correct me if you see any fault in my thinking process.

I guess that makes sense but im not sure of what should be the opposite of "many"? Should it be "most" (51-100) in that case its opposite will be will be less than half ie "0-50"
Yes in that case, the negation less than half did not understand the meaning of moderate and hence misdescribed themselves. Conclusion does not break down. Hence cannot be the answer.
HOw is the opposite of many "51-100" = some "1-100"
opposite of some/at least one "1-100" can be NONE (0) or NOT ALL "0-99"
Please correct me if I am wrong
_________________
_________________

You have to dig deep and find out what it takes to reshuffle the cards life dealt you

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 155

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2016
Posts: 268

Kudos [?]: 176 [0], given: 102

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Olin '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.7
WE: General Management (Other)
Re: 2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2016, 07:28
aniketm.87@gmail.com wrote:
deeksha6 wrote:
aniketm.87@gmail.com wrote:
2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where they stood on the political spectrum. 78% of these individuals described themselves as "moderate" in their political views; however, in the national elections that most closely preceded and followed the poll, over half of the individuals polled voted for candidates far to one end of the political spectrum. It follows that these individuals did not accurately describe their political views.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the above argument relies?
A. Individuals always characterize themselves in keeping with their actual political views.
B. There were no moderate candidates in the national elections preceding and following the poll.
C. Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.
D. Voters can be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time.
E. Many of the polled individuals did not understand what a moderate political view is, and so misdescribed themselves

Can some one please explain why E) is wrong?
I get that the negation of C works in order to answer the Q?

BUt still not convinced why E) is wrong

I have the same doubt.

Probably the catch in the sentence is the word 'MANY'. If we flip the sentence to read

Some of the polled individuals understood what a a moderate political view is, and so described themselves correctly.

'SOME' can mean any number from 0-2800. If some of these individuals did describe themselves correctly, it is likely that the 'others' did not, thus the argument can still hold ground.

Please correct me if you see any fault in my thinking process.

I guess that makes sense but im not sure of what should be the opposite of "many"? Should it be "most" (51-100) in that case its opposite will be will be less than half ie "0-50"
Yes in that case, the negation less than half did not understand the meaning of moderate and hence misdescribed themselves. Conclusion does not break down. Hence cannot be the answer.
HOw is the opposite of many "51-100" = some "1-100"
opposite of some/at least one "1-100" can be NONE (0) or NOT ALL "0-99"
Please correct me if I am wrong
_________________

"Many" is a very ambiguous word quite like "Few". "Many" basically means Majority and majority is itself a very ambiguous thing. For instance, in a survey of 1000 people if everyone has a different view save for 10 individuals, those 10 make the majority, and hence can be termed as many, even though they represent only 0.1% of the total survey pool.

Therefore, Many is not equal to Most. Opposite of "Many" is "Not Many".
BTW, Some = 1 to All
Most = 51% to 100%
Therefore, Opposite of Most Can Not be Some because Most is a subset of Some.
_________________

I'd appreciate learning about the grammatical errors in my posts

Please hit Kudos If my Solution helps

My Debrief for 750 - https://gmatclub.com/forum/from-720-to-750-one-of-the-most-difficult-pleatues-to-overcome-246420.html

My CR notes - https://gmatclub.com/forum/patterns-in-cr-questions-243450.html

Rest of the Notes coming soon.

Kudos [?]: 176 [0], given: 102

Intern
Joined: 21 Jun 2016
Posts: 49

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 116

GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: 2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2016, 12:55
gamelord wrote:
2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where they stood on the political spectrum. 78% of these individuals described themselves as "moderate" in their political views; however, in the national elections that most closely preceded and followed the poll, over half of the individuals polled voted for candidates far to one end of the political spectrum. It follows that these individuals did not accurately describe their political views.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the above argument relies?
A. Individuals always characterize themselves in keeping with their actual political views.
B. There were no moderate candidates in the national elections preceding and following the poll.
C. Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views.
D. Voters can be highly fickle, changing their political views in a relatively short period of time.
E. Many of the polled individuals did not understand what a moderate political view is, and so misdescribed themselves.

I don't understand the explanation of OE. Can you explain in details for me?

Conclusion:These individuals did not accurately describe their political views

How is the author so sure that the individuals actually did not accurately describe their political views?--Because he expects :Voters with moderate political views will not vote for candidates who do not express moderate political views. That's the assumption.Hence C.

Press Kudos if that was helpful.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 116

Re: 2,500 individuals of voting age were polled and asked where   [#permalink] 14 Nov 2016, 12:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by