GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 07 Dec 2019, 04:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the Unit

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Posts: 211
Location: United States (ID)
GPA: 3.33
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
GMAT ToolKit User
A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the Unit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Feb 2018, 14:02
20
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

64% (01:25) correct 36% (01:39) wrong based on 589 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the United States were admitted to hospitals due to malnutrition. In the same year, a little more than 7,200 nonhomeless people were admitted to hospitals for the same reason. These findings clearly show that the nonhomeless are more likely to suffer from malnutrition than are the homeless.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most likely to point out the illogical nature of the conclusion drawn above?


(A) What is the relative level of severity of the malnutrition suffered by each group cited in the study?

(B) To what extent, on average, are the nonhomeless better off financially than are the homeless?

(C) To what extent are the causes of malnutrition in the nonhomeless related to ignorance of proper dietary habits?

(D) What percentage of each group cited in the study suffered from malnutrition last year?

(E) What effect would a large increase in the number of homeless shelters have on the incidence of malnutrition among the homeless?
Senior PS Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 3300
Location: India
GPA: 3.12
Re: A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the Unit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Feb 2018, 22:34
aaba wrote:
A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the United States were admitted to hospitals due to malnutrition. In the same year, a little more than 7,200 nonhomeless people were admitted to hospitals for the same reason. These findings clearly show that the nonhomeless are more likely to suffer from malnutrition than are the homeless.
The answer to which of the following questions would be most likely to point out the illogical nature of the conclusion drawn above?

(A) What is the relative level of severity of the malnutrition suffered by each group cited in the study?

(B) To what extent, on average, are the nonhomeless better off financially than are the homeless?

(C) To what extent are the causes of malnutrition in the nonhomeless related to ignorance of proper dietary habits?

(D) What percentage of each group cited in the study suffered from malnutrition last year?

(E) What effect would a large increase in the number of homeless shelters have on the incidence of malnutrition among the homeless?


In this argument, we are given the number of people who were admitted into hospital due to malnutrition.
Around 6700 homeless people were admitted compared to the 7200 non-homeless people and a conclusion
is drawn that non-homeless are more likely to suffer from malnutrition than are the homeless. We have been
asked to point out a flaw in the reasoning.

Option D(What percentage of each group cited in the study suffered from malnutrition last year?) clearly
addresses this issue and is our answer!
_________________
You've got what it takes, but it will take everything you've got
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Feb 2018
Posts: 1
Re: A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the Unit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2018, 17:13
totally lost about this.... what does each group mean?
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Posts: 211
Location: United States (ID)
GPA: 3.33
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the Unit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2018, 18:14
701GMAT wrote:
totally lost about this.... what does each group mean?


do not worry much, just try to solve more verbal questions, and skim the solution. I suggest you borrow the book "Official Guideline" from the library and go to wiley.gmat website. It has free question banks.

Back to this question, there are 2 groups: homeless people and none-homeless people.
VP
VP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1487
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the Unit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2018, 18:21
701GMAT wrote:
totally lost about this.... what does each group mean?


hello, whenever you see an evaluate question, that question is an assumption question. One technique is to try to answer each question in the option. Another way is to find the gap. The third technique is to build up the argument structure from the passage and find the logical issue. Here, I use the third technique. Each of 3 methods has the pre-thinking technique.
Noting that the argument tries to discuss the percentage, then test takers should think of the flaw about the number or the amount (pre-thinking technique)

D is the answer.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 21 Jan 2018
Posts: 7
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
Reviews Badge
Re: A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the Unit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2018, 21:41
The answer is D - the argument considered a numerical value to carry the same weight as a percentage.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1192
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the Unit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2018, 09:05
A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the United States were admitted to hospitals due to malnutrition. In the same year, a little more than 7,200 nonhomeless people were admitted to hospitals for the same reason. These findings clearly show that the nonhomeless are more likely to suffer from malnutrition than are the homeless.
The answer to which of the following questions would be most likely to point out the illogical nature of the conclusion drawn above?

(A) What is the relative level of severity of the malnutrition suffered by each group cited in the study?
Severity of malnutrition is out of scope. If people are suffering from malnutrition then they are suffering from malnutrition.

(B) To what extent, on average, are the nonhomeless better off financially than are the homeless?
Financially? Out of scope

(C) To what extent are the causes of malnutrition in the nonhomeless related to ignorance of proper dietary habits?
ignorance of proper dietry habits? Out of scope

(D) What percentage of each group cited in the study suffered from malnutrition last year?
Correct. If the homeless who suffered malnutrition were 90% of the total homeless people and the non-homeless who suffered from malnutrition were only 20% then this option casts doubt on the argument. Correct.

(E) What effect would a large increase in the number of homeless shelters have on the incidence of malnutrition among the homeless?
This option talks about a scenario that might occur in the future - a hypothesis. This option is out of scope.
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59587
Re: A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the Unit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2018, 03:21
aaba wrote:
A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the United States were admitted to hospitals due to malnutrition. In the same year, a little more than 7,200 nonhomeless people were admitted to hospitals for the same reason. These findings clearly show that the nonhomeless are more likely to suffer from malnutrition than are the homeless.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most likely to point out the illogical nature of the conclusion drawn above?


(A) What is the relative level of severity of the malnutrition suffered by each group cited in the study?

(B) To what extent, on average, are the nonhomeless better off financially than are the homeless?

(C) To what extent are the causes of malnutrition in the nonhomeless related to ignorance of proper dietary habits?

(D) What percentage of each group cited in the study suffered from malnutrition last year?

(E) What effect would a large increase in the number of homeless shelters have on the incidence of malnutrition among the homeless?


KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



The GMAT test makers have an incredible knack for writing short, unassuming arguments that nonetheless pack a major wallop. This one's a good example. It's one of the shortest arguments you'll see, and it doesn't even contain any difficult words, but it sure gives people fits— and that's because of the statistics involved. It goes to show that it really doesn't take much more than a few well-placed statistics to, shall we say, liven things up. The first thing you might have noticed is that the argument contains both numbers and statistics. The 6,700 and 7,200 figures represent actual numbers of people, while the conclusion states what's "more likely" to happen— a clear reference to an element of probability. Knowing from the stem that the argument is fatally flawed, this should have already raised a red flag. Here's the specific lowdown: Since only 6,700 homeless people suffering from malnutrition were admitted to U.S. hospitals last year, compared to 7,200 nonhomeless people, the nonhomeless must be more likely to suffer from malnutrition. Perhaps the argument immediately struck you as a little wacky, as it well should have given the clues in the question stem.

An 800 test taker is suspicious whenever she sees raw numbers side by side in an argument with rates, percentages, or probabilities— especially in a Logical Flaw question.

We're asked to find a question whose answer would most effectively illuminate the problem with the argument, and, as strongly suggested above, this boils down to a numbers versus percentages game: We cannot figure the odds of suffering from malnutrition solely from the number of malnourished people in each group. We must also know the overall total of people in each group before we can create ratios and thus figure out the "likelihood" of suffering from this condition. The only way for this conclusion to be valid is if the total number of homeless people in the U.S. equals the total number of nonhomeless people—then the 7,200 hospitalized nonhomeless, as opposed to the 6,700 hospitalized homeless, would suggests that the nonhomeless are more likely to suffer from malnutrition. But this is clearly a ludicrous assumption (at least at the present time)—there's no way the number of homeless equals the number of nonhomeless people in the U.S. The answer to the question in the correct choice will somehow point this out, thus making the flaw in the reasoning (using raw numbers as the basis for a conclusion about likelihood) plain to see. Choice (D) provides the question whose answer would provide the information we need to correctly understand the odds. Since the U.S. has far fewer homeless people than it has people with homes, the 6,700 figure would form a far higher percentage of homeless people who suffer from malnutrition than the percentage of nonhomeless people based on the 7,200 cases of malnutrition among this group. The answer to this question would allow us to see how the raw numbers cited do not support the author's counterintuitive conclusion that the nonhomeless are more susceptible to malnutrition than are the homeless. Go with (D).

(A) goes beyond the scope of the argument. The argument involves the likelihood of suffering from malnutrition, not the relative levels of severity.

(B) also introduces a new issue—finances. No matter how much people with homes are better off financially than are the homeless, the fact remains that more nonhomeless were hospitalized for malnutrition than homeless, and the answer to this question would do nothing to reveal the illogical conclusion that's drawn from this data.

(C) introduces another new issue. The argument draws no conclusion about the causes of malnutrition within these groups, only about the likelihood of malnutrition. Nailing down the precise causes of malnutrition in one of the groups wouldn't change the numbers in the evidence nor point out the problem with the logic.

(D) is irrelevant to the argument as presented. The future possibility of remedying homelessness to some degree does not impact upon these numbers and this particular conclusion drawn from them. The reasoning still seems off, but the answer to the question in (E) will not show how the logic goes astray.
_________________
CR Forum Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Posts: 671
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the Unit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Aug 2018, 07:38
Hey nightblade354

Please change the Tag to Flaw in reasoning Type.

Thanks!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Status: On the journey of achieving
Affiliations: Senior Manager, CA by profession, CFA(USA) Level 2
Joined: 06 Feb 2016
Posts: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GMAT 1: 560 Q44 V21
GPA: 3.82
WE: Other (Commercial Banking)
Reviews Badge
Re: A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the Unit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2018, 03:54
aaba wrote:
A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the United States were admitted to hospitals due to malnutrition. In the same year, a little more than 7,200 nonhomeless people were admitted to hospitals for the same reason. These findings clearly show that the nonhomeless are more likely to suffer from malnutrition than are the homeless.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most likely to point out the illogical nature of the conclusion drawn above?


(A) What is the relative level of severity of the malnutrition suffered by each group cited in the study? - OUT OF SCOPE, level of severity

(B) To what extent, on average, are the nonhomeless better off financially than are the homeless? - OUT OF SCOPE,financial aspect

(C) To what extent are the causes of malnutrition in the nonhomeless related to ignorance of proper dietary habits? - OUT OF SCOPE, ignorance of proper dietary habbits

(D) What percentage of each group cited in the study suffered from malnutrition last year? CORRECT, Considering % out of total strata is not considered when deriving the conclusion. For example - Total Homeless People 100, 80% suffered from malnutrition i.e. 80
Total Non Homeless People 100, 40% suffered from malnutrition i.e. 40 then this would create a doubt on the conclusion. Here as per our example, homeless people are more likely to suffer from malnutrition as compared to non homeless people. This aspect is not taken care of as we are talking only about numbers and not the percentage part.


(E) What effect would a large increase in the number of homeless shelters have on the incidence of malnutrition among the homeless?

OUT OF SCOPE, The future possibility of remedying homelessness to some degree does not impact upon these numbers

Kindly give kudos if my explanation helped :-)
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7177
Re: A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the Unit  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Nov 2019, 01:37
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the Unit   [#permalink] 24 Nov 2019, 01:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A study found that last year roughly 6,700 homeless people in the Unit

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne