Last visit was: 11 Jul 2025, 00:59 It is currently 11 Jul 2025, 00:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
505-555 Level|   Pronouns|                           
User avatar
seekmba
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Last visit: 25 Sep 2014
Posts: 626
Own Kudos:
3,546
 [235]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 626
Kudos: 3,546
 [235]
26
Kudos
Add Kudos
209
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
TommyWallach
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Last visit: 14 Nov 2011
Posts: 323
Own Kudos:
7,252
 [49]
Given Kudos: 11
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Location: San Francisco
Concentration: Journalism
 Q47  V47 GMAT 2: 770  Q49  V48
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 323
Kudos: 7,252
 [49]
32
Kudos
Add Kudos
17
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
pqhai
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Last visit: 26 Nov 2015
Posts: 868
Own Kudos:
8,824
 [24]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: United States
Posts: 868
Kudos: 8,824
 [24]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
bakfed
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Last visit: 12 Oct 2022
Posts: 1,768
Own Kudos:
1,242
 [5]
Given Kudos: 37
Status:Darden Class of 2013
Schools:University of Virginia
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V37
Posts: 1,768
Kudos: 1,242
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i can't really gasp why (D) is wrong, besides the unidiomatic way of saying this sentence.

I would choose (E) over (D) and this is simply because (D) just sounds wrong and ambiguous.
User avatar
sidhu4u
Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Last visit: 02 May 2011
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
1,064
 [7]
Given Kudos: 13
Concentration: Consulting
 Q49  V40
Products:
Posts: 111
Kudos: 1,064
 [7]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TommyWallach
(D) to a two-year low level

There are two ways we could read this.

#1: "low level" is meant to be read as one thing, and two-year is modifying it (as in "It was a lovely barn dance", in which "lovely" is modifying the compound noun "barn dance). This doesn't make any sense, however, because there's no such thing as a "low level".

#2: "Two-year" is an adverb modifying the main adjective "low", which is describing "level" (as in "It was a dark green sweater", in which dark is modifying green, which is modifying sweater). This doesn't make any sense either, however, because there's no such thing as a level that is "two-year low".

Tommy, is the following construction correct? I've removed the word 'level' from choice D.

According to some economists, the July decrease in unemployment to a two-year low suggests that the gradual improvement in the job market is continuing.
User avatar
TommyWallach
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Last visit: 14 Nov 2011
Posts: 323
Own Kudos:
7,252
 [4]
Given Kudos: 11
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Location: San Francisco
Concentration: Journalism
 Q47  V47 GMAT 2: 770  Q49  V48
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 323
Kudos: 7,252
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey Sidhu,

Yes, as far as I can see, your suggest construction would be correct.

-tommy
avatar
tcsing
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Last visit: 18 May 2013
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
204
 [2]
Given Kudos: 15
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According to some economists, the July decrease in unemployment so that it was the lowest in two years suggests that the gradual improvement in the job market is continuing.

(A) so that it was the lowest in two years
(B) so that it was the lowest two-year rate
(C) to what would be the lowest in two years
(D) to a two-year low level
(E) to the lowest level in two years

Hi! I would like to clarify pronoun antecedent. It seems that as sentences become more difficult, pronoun antecedent eligbility becomes less clear-cut. I have read in some places that an antecedent cannot be an object of a preposition but elsewhere it says this is possible. Would anyone be able to help clarify please?

Thanks!

For example, for above, the OG says "it" is ambiguous because it can refer to either decrease or unemployment. I can see that if "it" refers to decrease, the sentence won't make sense. However, the OA does not say it's a wrong antecedent but an ambiguous one. Unemployment is part of a prep phrase. In OG13, the OA says that objects of prepositions can't be antecedents for pronouns?

Q: Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles islands.
OA: "Because sloth is the object of a preposition and not the subject of the sentence, there is no reasonable antecedent for "it"
Edit: by carcass
User avatar
PeakPerformance
Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Last visit: 03 Nov 2014
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
4
 [1]
Posts: 16
Kudos: 4
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

An object of a preposition can be a pronoun antecedent if the prepositional phrase is post-modifying the head noun.

Consider the following example of a noun phrase in which a prepositional phrase is used to post-modify the head noun: "the coat of many colors". The prepositional phrase is "of many colors." The head noun is coat. This head noun is pre-modified by the identifier the. In addition, it is post-modified by the prepositional phrase of many colors. It is a simple matter to determine if this complex structure is functioning as a complete noun phrase, as it is always possible to substitute a pronoun for a whole noun phrase. So, in the utterance the coat of many colors was beautiful a pronoun may be substituted for the noun phrase to produce the modified utterance it was beautiful.
avatar
atalwar
Joined: 18 Aug 2013
Last visit: 04 May 2014
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
21
 [14]
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 14
Kudos: 21
 [14]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
e-GMAT video explanation:

User avatar
kassim
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Last visit: 29 Mar 2021
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
12
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V28
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
eybrj2
50. According to some economists, the July decrease in unemployment so that it was the lowest in two years suggests that the gradual improvement in the job market is continuing.

(A) so that it was the lowest in two years
(B) so that it was the lowest two-year rate
(C) to what would be the lowest in two years
(D) to a two-year low level
(E) to the lowest level in two years

Why D is wrong?

I Hope someone can help
User avatar
sivasanjeev
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Last visit: 22 Dec 2014
Posts: 116
Own Kudos:
1,597
 [4]
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 116
Kudos: 1,597
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kassim
Why D is wrong?
I Hope someone can help

decrease ... to a two year low would have sufficed.

"level" is additionally/wrongly used in option 'D'
avatar
vietmoi999
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Last visit: 07 Dec 2014
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
70
 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Posts: 98
Kudos: 70
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
eybrj2
50. According to some economists, the July decrease in unemployment so that it was the lowest in two years suggests that the gradual improvement in the job market is continuing.

(A) so that it was the lowest in two years
(B) so that it was the lowest two-year rate
(C) to what would be the lowest in two years
(D) to a two-year low level
(E) to the lowest level in two years

nice question.

"so that +clause" is a adverb clause of purpose. of course this clause need a main clause. There is no main clause. A and B are gone.

in c, "would be " show the certainty, not a fact. This is wrong. we need to show a fact. C is gone

in D, "two year low" is not idiomatic. This phrase is meaningless.
User avatar
ydmuley
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2019
Posts: 809
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 199
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello EGMAT, GMATNinja,

Could you please clarify the usage of lowest over here?

Ideally, if we have to compare between two, we use comparative form ("lower" in this case) and if we are to compare more than two, we use superlative form ("lowest" in this case)

IMO - We are comparing the unemployment between two years so we should be using - lower.

Is there any exception to this rule? Or I am getting it wrong?

Thank you in advance!
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 2,945
Own Kudos:
8,385
 [3]
Given Kudos: 57
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 2,945
Kudos: 8,385
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ydmuley, you're right that we wouldn't want to use "lowest" to compare two figures, such as the levels for two entire years. However, "the lowest level in two years" means that if we look at all the levels over a two year period, this would be the lowest point. Imagine a graph of daily, weekly, or monthly values for the past two years. We're talking about the absolute lowest point on that graph.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
User avatar
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Last visit: 17 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,694
Own Kudos:
15,050
 [4]
Given Kudos: 766
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,694
Kudos: 15,050
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello seekmba,

Thank you for your question. To answer your specific question of why D can't be the correct answer, we need to look at what both D & E (the correct answer) actually mean:

(D) to a two-year low level
By saying "low level," it doesn't tell us this is the lowest level in two years - just that it's low. It could have been just as low at some other point in the past two years, and that this is just one of those times. Since that's not specific enough for readers to understand quickly, it's not the best answer.

(E) to the lowest level in two years
By saying "the lowest level," it's clear that the unemployment level has not been this low at any other point in the past two years. This is the intended meaning of the sentence, so it's the better answer.
avatar
Hanzel101
Joined: 15 Jul 2016
Last visit: 23 Feb 2020
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
89
 [2]
Given Kudos: 190
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V36
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V36
Posts: 72
Kudos: 89
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According to some economists, the July decrease in unemployment so that it was the lowest in two years suggests that the gradual improvement in the job market is continuing.


(A) so that it was the lowest in two years - SO THAT is used to give reasons. Is the reason for decrease in employment that it was the lowest in two years?

(B) so that it was the lowest two-year rate - Here, lowest acts as an adjective modifying two year rate. The original sentence intends to say that the rate was the lowest in two years, NOT that there were many two year rates and this one was the lowest.

(C) to what would be the lowest in two years - The usage of would suggests that the rate is not actually the lowest. It sounds as if it is a prediction.

(D) to a two-year low level - same as B

(E) to the lowest level in two years - BEST.

Thanks
avatar
mba757
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 15 Jun 2020
Last visit: 04 Aug 2022
Posts: 308
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 245
Location: United States
GPA: 3.3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) so that it was the lowest in two years
(1) changes meaning: almost sounds like there’s some intentional argument here – “the July decrease in unemployment SO THAT it was the lowest” (intentionally the lowest by someone)

(B) so that it was the lowest two-year rate
(1) changes meaning: almost sounds like there’s some intentional argument here – “the July decrease in unemployment SO THAT it was the lowest” (intentionally the lowest by someone); (2) changes meaning/false concision: “two-year rate” sounds as though this a TYPE of rate and not a rate that is “two years” long, in terms of duration

(C) to what would be the lowest in two years
(1) changes meaning: almost sounds as though the “decrease” was the lowest in two years, but it should be the “unemployment” that was the lowest

(D) to a two-year low level
(1) changes meaning/false concision: “two-year low level” sounds as though this a TYPE of low level and not a low level that happens to be “low”

(E) to the lowest level in two years
Best option
User avatar
Romil042
Joined: 26 Dec 2019
Last visit: 18 Sep 2022
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 112
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V22
GMAT 2: 670 Q49 V31
GPA: 4
WE:Research (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 2: 670 Q49 V31
Posts: 57
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
seekmba
According to some economists, the July decrease in unemployment so that it was the lowest in two years suggests that the gradual improvement in the job market is continuing.


(A) so that it was the lowest in two years

(B) so that it was the lowest two-year rate

(C) to what would be the lowest in two years

(D) to a two-year low level

(E) to the lowest level in two years

Let me try to show my approach. IMO E.
Option A: The usage of "SO THAT" is used to show some intention. Here economists are just concluding/predicting some results.
e.g. Minister spoke slowly SO THAT dictators can note each aspect of speech.
here for the sentence, such intention is missing.

Option B: same as A

Option C: The usage of the word "WOULD" is creating a logical gap. Once the data is in front of the economist then the deductions are certain in nature. There shall not be such usage of the word "WOULD" needed. Besides this, "LOWEST IN TWO YEARS", what is the lowest? Population? Food? Water? again this mistake creates a logical gap.

Option D: "TO A TWO YEAR LOW LEVEL" the july ... to a level, which is low, which is two year! Again improper modifier usage.

Option E: The only worrier left out hence, E is the winner.
the july ... to the lowest level in two years. The levels achieved are the lowest level. the lowest level of two years.

Helpful tip
The compound adjectives can use a hyphen.
Noun can have plural, hence a hyphen not needed.
User avatar
saby1410
Joined: 06 Feb 2017
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 186
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93
Location: India
Posts: 186
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN AjiteshArun
I didn't get two year low level vs tovthe lowest level in two years

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 01 Jun 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,055
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
saby1410
AndrewN AjiteshArun
I didn't get two year low level vs tovthe lowest level in two years
Hi saby1410,

It'd be great to see other opinions on this, but I think a two-year low level is unidiomatic.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts