GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 23 Jan 2019, 02:11

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Key Strategies to Master GMAT SC

     January 26, 2019

     January 26, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Attend this webinar to learn how to leverage Meaning and Logic to solve the most challenging Sentence Correction Questions.
  • Free GMAT Number Properties Webinar

     January 27, 2019

     January 27, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes.

After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 739
After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 09 Mar 2018, 07:43
1
4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (01:47) correct 28% (02:11) wrong based on 326 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

16. After observing the Earth’s weather patterns and the 11-year sunspot cycle of the Sun for 36 years, scientists have found that high levels of sunspot activity precede shifts in wind patterns that affect the Earth’s weather. One can conclude that meteorologists will be able to improve their weather forecasts based on this information.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) Weather forecasts are more detailed today than they were 36 years ago.
(B) Scientists can establish that sunspot activity directly affects the Earth’s weather.
(C) Evidence other than sunspot activity has previously enabled meteorologists to forecast the weather conditions that are predictable on the basis of sunspot activity.
(D) Scientists have not determined why the sunspot activity on the Sun follows an 11-year cycle.
(E) It has been established that predictable wind patterns yield predictable weather patterns.

_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html


Originally posted by nitya34 on 25 Mar 2009, 03:32.
Last edited by broall on 09 Mar 2018, 07:43, edited 1 time in total.
Added OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 79
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 26 Mar 2009, 09:35
This is again an instance of
cause1 ---> effect1,
to weaken find some other cause2 which also causes effect1.

In this question,
Information from sunspot activity ---> will help to determine weather forecasts
But B says that
Evidence other than sunspot activity ---- > has also enabled meteorologists to forecast the weather conditions.

Edit: Hence C
_________________

"The highest result of education is tolerance."


Originally posted by jainu on 25 Mar 2009, 06:31.
Last edited by jainu on 26 Mar 2009, 09:35, edited 1 time in total.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1266
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2009, 07:31
1
C for me

Conclusion is that meteorologists will be able to improve their weather forecasts based on this information.

We need to prove that meteorologists will NOT be able to improve their weather forecasts based on this information.

C exactly does that. What ever can be deduced using the Sun spot activity has been deduced from other activity. Hence S will NOT be able to improve.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1266
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2009, 15:39
nitya34 wrote:
Yes C but why not A?
is it OOS?


Yes, it is unrelated and will NOT weaken the Conclusion

The key in conclusion is will be able to improve and pick answer that will make you say will NOT be able to improve
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 79
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Mar 2009, 09:33
I am sorry I meant C above in my reply..it was a typo.
_________________

"The highest result of education is tolerance."

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 99
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Mar 2009, 10:04
16. After observing the Earth’s weather patterns and the 11-year sunspot cycle of the Sun for 36 years, scientists have found that high levels of sunspot activity precede shifts in wind patterns that affect the Earth’s weather. One can conclude that meteorologists will be able to improve their weather forecasts based on this information.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) Weather forecasts are more detailed today than they were 36 years ago.
(B) Scientists can establish that sunspot activity directly affects the Earth’s weather.
(C) Evidence other than sunspot activity has previously enabled meteorologists to forecast the weather conditions that are predictable on the basis of sunspot activity.
(D) Scientists have not determined why the sunspot activity on the Sun follows an 11-year cycle.
(E) It has been established that predictable wind patterns yield predictable weather patterns.

It is indeed C.

Evidence of other than sunspot activities already enabled us to predict weather condition..
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 125
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2009, 18:24
nitya34 wrote:
Yes C but why not A?
is it OOS?

A is only the general information, it does nothing about the conclusion which says due to the sunspot activity observation meteorologists will be able to improve their weather forecasts.
OA must be C
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 154
Location: India
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2010, 16:53
1
2
After observing the Earth’s weather patterns and the 11-year sunspot cycle of the Sun for 36 years, scientists have found that high levels of sunspot activity precede shifts in wind patterns that affect the Earth’s weather. One can conclude that meteorologists will be able to improve their weather forecasts based on this information.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
(A) Weather forecasts are more detailed today than they were 36 years ago.
(B) Scientists can establish that sunspot activity directly affects the Earth’s weather.
(C) Evidence other than sunspot activity has previously enabled meteorologists to forecast the weather conditions that are predictable on the basis of sunspot activity.
(D) Scientists have not determined why the sunspot activity on the Sun follows an 11-year cycle.
(E) It has been established that predictable wind patterns yield predictable weather patterns.

Please give ur logic. Dont just say answer.
_________________

Cheers,
SD

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 256
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2010, 16:59
1
My pic is C
If other evidence can be used to predict the whether then there is no need of sunspot activity.
sunspot activity can still be used to double check however there is no improvement in forecasts
_________________

Always tag your question

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 154
Location: India
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2010, 17:11
1
CN: meteorologists will be able to improve their weather forecasts based on this information.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(C) Evidence other than sunspot activity has previously enabled meteorologists to forecast the weather conditions that are predictable on the basis of sunspot activity.

-- This option says meteorologists already know this relationship from other source of information. So forecast will not improve.
This is the correct answer.
This question baffled me initially. Thanks for taking interest in this post guys.
_________________

Cheers,
SD

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 249
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2010, 19:00
1
I also go for C. Lets follow POE approach
A , D--> Irrelevant
C --> Keep it
B --> at most it strengthen the argument
E--> No way related
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 151
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2010, 10:27
1
SudiptoGmat wrote:
CN: meteorologists will be able to improve their weather forecasts based on this information.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(C) Evidence other than sunspot activity has previously enabled meteorologists to forecast the weather conditions that are predictable on the basis of sunspot activity.

-- This option says meteorologists already know this relationship from other source of information. So forecast will not improve.
This is the correct answer.
This question baffled me initially. Thanks for taking interest in this post guys.


good work man
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 90
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2010, 06:29
2
easy C
_________________

consider cudos if you like my post

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1074
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2010, 09:20
1
C makes most sense.

If meteorologist has already been able to forecast weather conditions with other evidences than saying that sunspot activity will help M to improve the forecast is weakened.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 119
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2010, 12:41
C for me too ........but came to it by POE .............good explanations thanks
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Posts: 135
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2010, 21:11
Option E.. is it a flaw in reasoning here?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 181
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.95
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2012, 09:08
nitya34 wrote:
Yes C but why not A?
is it OOS?


A is not OOS, but in fact it strengthens. Having a detailed report means having greater knowledge (assuming the report is accurate). This can happen only if the dept has improved its prediction.
_________________

-------------------------
-Aravind Chembeti

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 62
Schools: IIMA
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2014, 02:54
Of the ways In which you can weaken a cause effect relations is to find alternate cause ... What is the cause given in the stimulus ? High level of. Sunspot activity .... What is the effect ? Earth weather is effected.

Now if there exist an alternate explanation to the cause .... Then. Our conclusion Will be weakened....

Option c. States that other cause for earth weather being affected . This therefore weakens the conclusion.

hope it helps )
_________________

If you are not over prepared then you are under prepared !!!

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 17 Aug 2015
Posts: 97
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Reviews Badge
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2017, 14:56
choice C, no use of this research for better prediction as scientists have already developed a very matured prediction
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 326
Premium Member
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2017, 09:32
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules

GMAT Club Bot
Re: After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year &nbs [#permalink] 15 Jul 2017, 09:32

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

After observing the Earth s weather patterns and the 11-year

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.