It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 16:49

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Analysis of an argument: What if an argument has no flaws

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 1

Analysis of an argument: What if an argument has no flaws [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Jun 2010, 16:57
Hi Guys
I have often seen that responses to an argument is to criticize it.

However, i have noticed some arguments that have no flaws.

How do we respond to such arguments?

Please see below argument to see what i mean.

==
"Most companies would agree that as the risk of
physical injury occuring on the job increases, the wages
paid to employees should also increase. Hence, it makes
financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer:
they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money
"

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2009
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 3 [2], given: 0

Re: Analysis of an argument: What if an argument has no flaws [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jun 2010, 08:55
2
KUDOS
All of the samples are clearly flawed.

The following appeared in the editorial section of a monthly business newsmagazine: “Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.”

The editorial is poorly argued and presents several logical leaps that are not supported by any data. The editorial states that companies should in all cases make work places safer. It reaches the conclusion that safer workplaces will automatically reduce payroll expenses and thus save the company money. This agreement is weak. It presents no data or examples to support its conclusions.

In the first place the editorial shows an utter lack of understanding in the nuances of business management. While work place safety should be a primary concern for all business managers it is not the only concern. There is a balance that must be struck between business costs and benefits. In some industries workplace injuries are an accepted risk because it is understood that the costs to mitigate those risks is simply too high. For example foundries are inherently dangerous environments. Handling metals that have been heated to hundreds of degrees requires caution, and metal working companies should strive for safe workplaces, however the costs of making a foundry 100% safe would far exceed any return achieved by lower wages.

In the second place the editorial assumes that safety improvements lead to reduced wages. It does this while presenting no data to back this claim. While it might be argued that in some instances wage reductions could be expected as jobs become less dangerous, job safety is only one aspect of employee wages. Worker expertise, scarcity, and longevity typically have a much greater impact on the wages that an employee can expect from a particular job. Making the assumption that safety is the primary factor in employees pay is a stretch.

What is of primary importance for companies is to deal with workplace safety in an ethical manner. Employees should fully understand the risks of the work they are asked to perform. Once they understand the risks and the benefits they can accurately determine if the work should be engaged in. If the risks are too high and injury is assured, then the company needs to address those risks. If a company can reduce risks at minimal costs then they have the moral obligation to do so. However when costs are high and risks are low then all parties need to understand why safety improvements are not feasible.

In light of the recent workplace tragedies that can be seen on the nightly news it is understandable why one might feel that safety should be of high importance to company managers. However it is not the only concern. Companies exist to make profits; they need to weigh the benefits of safety and profitability in an open and ethical manner. The notion that all safety improvements will always be profitable regardless of cost is not supported by any data. The author’s conclusion is weak and the editorial ignores many real world examples.

Steve

Kudos [?]: 3 [2], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 1

Re: Analysis of an argument: What if an argument has no flaws [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jun 2010, 17:35
Thanks Steve.
So, the conclusion is that we have to find flaws in every argument.

Thanks

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2009
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 0

Re: Analysis of an argument: What if an argument has no flaws [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jun 2010, 17:38
1
KUDOS
Correct all of the sample arguments are very weak.

Steve

PS Kudos are appreciated

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 0

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10197

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Re: Analysis of an argument: What if an argument has no flaws [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Jul 2014, 10:54
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Re: Analysis of an argument: What if an argument has no flaws   [#permalink] 09 Jul 2014, 10:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Analysis of an argument: What if an argument has no flaws

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.