Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 05:01 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 05:01
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3   
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 02 Jun 2021, 20:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RohitSaluja
Hi AjiteshArun thanks for your response, as you mentioned sentence can be written as both "They predicted that a second wave would occur" and "They predicted a second wave would occur", so we cant really eliminate option A and B(as done by EmpowerGmat in its explanation to this question) just because they do not contain that. Is this correct ?

Rather A can be eliminated for using past perfect and B can be eliminated for missing "than" as correct idiom is "less... than"
Show more
Hi RohitSaluja,

You're correct, and the issues you have pointed out in A and B are also valid ways to take those options out.

To sum up, the idiomatic call in this question is not whether a that has to be explicitly mentioned after the verb predict. The structure we're looking at in A and B is not predict + {subject + verb}. Instead, it is predict + noun + infinitive:

predict the coming year to be

This structure is incorrect, and its use in A and B gives us yet another way to take those options out.
avatar
tt147
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2019
Last visit: 29 Jan 2022
Posts: 19
Given Kudos: 44
Posts: 19
Kudos: 0
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 05 Jun 2021, 08:04
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi AjiteshArun

If we remove "will be" in option choice E and replace it with "would be", then would it still be correct ?
User avatar
mSKR
User avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
938
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: IE (A) IIML-IPMX '22 (A) HKUST '22
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
Schools: IE (A) IIML-IPMX '22 (A) HKUST '22
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 938
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 05 Jun 2021, 17:21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi AjiteshArun GMATNinja

Quote:
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be no less challenging than the previous one had been for the company's C.E.O.

(A) the coming year to be no less challenging than the previous one had been
(E) that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one
Show more

When I read E:
Analysts and media executives predict that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one (WILL BE) for the company's C.E.O.
My question : When no verb is present in the end . It is understood to carry previous verb forward as elliptical. But in this case : this elliptical verb is : WILL BE Or the helping verb can be any ( was)

For more clarity:
She buys more items than he ( buys): here buys is understood ; buys is carried forward and in this case we may no need to mention it explicitly.
It is better to repeat helping verb/verb(placeholder verb?) if tense is changed
She buys more items than he BOUGHT ( If i don't mention BOUGHT , it would be taken as buys and meaning would be different)

When we come to E:
as no helping verb is present in the end of sentence, so helping verb carried forward should be WILL BE but we want helping verb in PAST tense.


If we say : no need of any helping verb/verb (placeholder verb(, then how can I know I need to repeat helping verb or no need?

Please comment.AjiteshArun GMATNinja
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 05 Jun 2021, 22:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tt147
Hi AjiteshArun

If we remove "will be" in option choice E and replace it with "would be", then would it still be correct ?
Show more
Hi tt147,

A would be won't be correct (predict is present tense, so will is appropriate). Try to use would to refer to the future from the perspective of the past (there are, of course, other ways to use would). For example:

1. NASA says that it will launch the rocket before the weather gets worse.

Now let's "backshift" everything in (1) to see how we'd normally use a would in such sentences:

2. NASA says said that it will would launch the rocket before the weather gets got worse.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 05 Jun 2021, 22:24
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mSKR
My question : When no verb is present in the end . It is understood to carry previous verb forward as elliptical. But in this case : this elliptical verb is : WILL BE Or the helping verb can be any ( was)
Show more
Hi mSKR,

The verb will be was (than the previous one was...). I'm not aware of any rule that limits us to will. It'd be great to see other opinions on this though.
User avatar
saby1410
User avatar
Joined: 06 Feb 2017
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 183
Own Kudos:
23
Given Kudos: 93
Location: India
Posts: 183
Kudos: 23
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 20 Jun 2021, 11:25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN GMATNinja VeritasKarishma when time marker is used (previous ) then past perfect tense is correct so why can't in optionD it's correct like it's correct in below question
earlier used to denote action happened in past

According to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead come in for a 'soft landing', followed by a gradual increase in the business activity.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/according-to ... 70645.html
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,989
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,989
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 20 Jun 2021, 22:09
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
saby1410
AndrewN GMATNinja VeritasKarishma when time marker is used (previous ) then past perfect tense is correct so why can't in optionD it's correct like it's correct in below question
earlier used to denote action happened in past

According to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead come in for a 'soft landing', followed by a gradual increase in the business activity.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/according-to ... 70645.html
Show more


saby1410 -
The two questions are different. Both give you the current views of the analysts, agreed. But look at what the views are:

1. According to some economists, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead come in for a ‘soft landing’.

Earlier in the year - many had feared recession
But in the recent past, confidence has been growing and hence it is reflecting on the stock market now.
Hence the state of fear got over sometime in the past. So use of past perfect is correct.

2. Analysts and media executives predict that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one

Coming year will be no less challenging that the previous one.

There is no need to use past perfect here. We do not have two actions or points of time in the past. We are comparing the year that is coming with the year that has passed.
avatar
LipsaTripathy01
avatar
Schools: ISB '23 Ross '24 Rotman '24 Yale '24 Anderson '24 Booth '24 Broad Carlson Carroll CEIBS '24 Columbia CBS '24 Darden '24 Goizueta '24 ESADE Foster '24 Fuqua '24 Haas '24 Harvard '24 HKUST IESE '24 IMD '22 Johnson '24 Jones Judge '23 Katz Kelley '24 Kellogg '24 Kenan-Flagler '24 LBS '24 Madison Marshall '24 Mays McCombs '24 McDonough '24 Mendoza Merage NTU NUS Owen '24 Said '23 BU Erasmus Scheller Bocconi Simon '24 Sloan '24 Smeal Stanford '24 Tepper '24 Tuck '24 Warwick "23 Wharton '24
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V28
Posts: 3
Kudos: 3
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 21 Jul 2021, 06:25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is predicting something a certain event?
Example- I predict that it would rain today.
So here I am not sure if it will rain or not, its just a prediction.
So using predict how can we use will?
User avatar
saarthakkhanna04
User avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2018
Last visit: 11 Dec 2024
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
27
Given Kudos: 1,297
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Economics
GPA: 3
WE:Law (Telecommunications)
Posts: 78
Kudos: 27
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 21 Jul 2021, 08:59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
correct IDIOM is predict that X. Will be the tense for future and simple present required instead of had been. So E is correct.
User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 950
Own Kudos:
208
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 950
Kudos: 208
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 02 Oct 2021, 23:54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
generis
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be no less challenging than the previous one had been for the company's C.E.O.
Show more

(A) the coming year to be no less challenging than the previous one had been
Similar reasoning as B

(B) the coming year to be no less challenging compared to the previous one
that and will is required in the sentence to convey the intended meaning

(C) that the coming year would be no less challenging compared to the previous one
will is the right usage than would therefore out

(D) that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one had been
had been usage in the end is not required therefore out

(E) that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one
The meaning and tense is perfect therefore our answer

THerefore IMO E
User avatar
ali267
User avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2021
Last visit: 01 Feb 2023
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
1
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 16
Kudos: 1
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 08 Nov 2021, 12:03
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
RohitSaluja
Hi VeritasKarishma GMATNinja AjiteshArun EducationAisle

I am not sure what exactly 'that' is doing in the sentence above, and whether it can be used to eliminate A and B. In below exampl usage of that is optional. Based on my understanding "that" can be optional if we have a seperate subject present inside the clause in below case "Irving" is that subject

1. The baboon Irving was feeding had an angry look about it

2. The baboon that Irving was feeding had an angry look about it

Coming back to the question isnt "the coming year" also the subject as "Irving" is in my example? if yes then isnt "that" optional and not the decision point to eliminate A and B. Appreciate your time on this.
Hi RohitSaluja,

This is more an idiomatic issue than something to do with that. Let's look at some of the ways we can use the verb predict:
1. predict + noun: They predicted the second wave.

2. predict + that-clause: They predicted that a second wave would occur. ← We could have dropped the that and gone with They predicted a second wave would occur.

We can use (2) in a passive construction as well:

3. It was predicted that a second wave would occur.

We can even use an infinitive in the passive:

4. A second wave was predicted to occur.

But we can't use predict + noun + infinitive:

5. They predicted the second wave to occur.
Show more

Why can't we use predict + noun + infinitive?
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,765
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 09 Nov 2021, 04:25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ali267
AjiteshArun
RohitSaluja
Hi VeritasKarishma GMATNinja AjiteshArun EducationAisle

I am not sure what exactly 'that' is doing in the sentence above, and whether it can be used to eliminate A and B. In below exampl usage of that is optional. Based on my understanding "that" can be optional if we have a seperate subject present inside the clause in below case "Irving" is that subject

1. The baboon Irving was feeding had an angry look about it

2. The baboon that Irving was feeding had an angry look about it

Coming back to the question isnt "the coming year" also the subject as "Irving" is in my example? if yes then isnt "that" optional and not the decision point to eliminate A and B. Appreciate your time on this.
Hi RohitSaluja,

This is more an idiomatic issue than something to do with that. Let's look at some of the ways we can use the verb predict:
1. predict + noun: They predicted the second wave.

2. predict + that-clause: They predicted that a second wave would occur. ← We could have dropped the that and gone with They predicted a second wave would occur.

We can use (2) in a passive construction as well:

3. It was predicted that a second wave would occur.

We can even use an infinitive in the passive:

4. A second wave was predicted to occur.

But we can't use predict + noun + infinitive:

5. They predicted the second wave to occur.

Why can't we use predict + noun + infinitive?
Show more

Hello ali267,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your query, we believe we can help resolve your doubt.

As mentioned by AjiteshArun, this matter is largely an idiomatic one; idiomatic conventions in the English language typically do not have firm reasoning behind them; rather, they are simply established rules that must be followed.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Tanchat
User avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 20 Jun 2023
Posts: 222
Own Kudos:
20
Given Kudos: 139
Posts: 222
Kudos: 20
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 02 Jan 2022, 05:36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Experts,

I have a question for Option (E) that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one


Is a verb omitted ? Should it be " that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one was/would be " ???
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 02 Jan 2022, 10:47
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tanchat

I have a question for Option (E) that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one

Is a verb omitted ? Should it be " that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one was/would be " ???
Show more
Yes; it's really common to omit (assume) a verb after than, as long as there is no meaning ambiguity.

Example:

Peter earns more than Jack.

This is equivalent to:

Peter earns more than Jack (earns).

Michael's car is more expensive than Sam's car.

This is equivalent to:

Michael's car is more expensive than Sam's car (is).
User avatar
Tanchat
User avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 20 Jun 2023
Posts: 222
Own Kudos:
20
Given Kudos: 139
Posts: 222
Kudos: 20
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 03 Jan 2022, 03:08
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle
Tanchat

I have a question for Option (E) that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one

Is a verb omitted ? Should it be " that the coming year will be no less challenging than the previous one was/would be " ???
Yes; it's really common to omit (assume) a verb after than, as long as there is no meaning ambiguity.

Example:

Peter earns more than Jack.

This is equivalent to:

Peter earns more than Jack (earns).

Michael's car is more expensive than Sam's car.

This is equivalent to:

Michael's car is more expensive than Sam's car (is).
Show more

Thank you for the answer ! EducationAisle,

Could you elaborate a little bit more?
How can we omit the verb in this case : the previous one is the past. Thus, "will be" cannot fill here --> Then, verb cannot be omitted due to the different tense.
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 03 Jan 2022, 03:15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tanchat

Could you elaborate a little bit more?
How can we omit the verb in this case : the previous one is the past. Thus, "will be" cannot fill here --> Then, verb cannot be omitted due to the different tense.
Show more
Indeed; however, an exception to this is when the verb being implied is a linking verb (most notably is/was/were). In such cases, the verb can be implied, despite the tense change.

Another official example:

Prices at the producer level are only 1.3 percent higher now than those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raising corn and soybean prices.

Notice that the verb were is implied after the comparison operator, though the verb before the comparison operator is are.
User avatar
Tanchat
User avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 20 Jun 2023
Posts: 222
Own Kudos:
20
Given Kudos: 139
Posts: 222
Kudos: 20
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 03 Jan 2022, 03:22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle
Tanchat

Could you elaborate a little bit more?
How can we omit the verb in this case : the previous one is the past. Thus, "will be" cannot fill here --> Then, verb cannot be omitted due to the different tense.
Indeed; however, an exception to this is when the verb being implied is a linking verb (most notably is/was/were). In such cases, the verb can be implied, despite the tense change.

Another official example:

Prices at the producer level are only 1.3 percent higher now than those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raising corn and soybean prices.

Notice that the verb were is implied after the comparison operator, though the verb before the comparison operator is are.
Show more


Understood ! Thank you so much ! EducationAisle
User avatar
EtaCarnia
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 22 Aug 2025
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
41
Given Kudos: 73
Location: India
Schools: Sauder '22 DeGroote "22 Smurfit Alberta University
GPA: 3.5
Schools: Sauder '22 DeGroote "22 Smurfit Alberta University
Posts: 68
Kudos: 41
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 12 Jan 2022, 08:10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi ,

I am little confused over the usage of will / would.

Option C: that the coming year would be no less challenging compared to the previous one.

It's a future prediction, not a certainty . Isn't use of would is correct?
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 13 Jan 2022, 00:21
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EtaCarnia
Hi ,

I am little confused over the usage of will / would.

Option C: that the coming year would be no less challenging compared to the previous one.

It's a future prediction, not a certainty . Isn't use of would is correct?
Show more
Well, easiest way to eliminate C would be on the basis of "idiom". The correct idiom is:

Less....than
More....than
Greater....than
Lesser....than
Higher....than
Lower....than
More....than

Not the following:

Less...compared to

Generally would is used for fanciful scenarios (for example: If I were a millionaire, I would be a spendthrift).

Another usage of would is when sentence talks about the future, in the past.

So, both of the following sentences are correct:

John predicts that Stock market will perform well.
- John predicts (in the present) about the future and so, the sentence uses "will".

John predicted that Stock market would perform well.
- John predicted (in the past) about the future and so, the sentence uses "would".

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses usage of "would", its application and examples in significant detail. If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,765
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
 [1]
Analysts and media executives predict the coming year to be 13 Jan 2022, 06:01
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EtaCarnia
Hi ,

I am little confused over the usage of will / would.

Option C: that the coming year would be no less challenging compared to the previous one.

It's a future prediction, not a certainty . Isn't use of would is correct?
Show more

Hello EtaCarnia,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, since the sentence already uses the verb "predict", the use of "would" is actually redundant here.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts