Last visit was: 22 Sep 2026, 09:07 It is currently 22 Sep 2026, 09:07
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
chloeholding
User avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Last visit: 01 May 2011
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
9
Posts: 6
Kudos: 9
ANOTHER number properties question 06 Apr 2011, 16:30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
N
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:51) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Having a lot of trouble with these number properties questions...

QUESTION: If p is a positive integer and 10p / 96 is an integer, then the minimum number of prime factors p could have is?

My method was to simplify 10p / 96 to 5p / 48 and then since 5 is not a factor of 48 conclude that p must be a multiple of 48 for the result to be an integer. And if p is a multiple of 48 the minimum it can be is 48, and in that case it must have the prime factors 2 and 3. Is that reasoning sound? I'm really fumbling around with the number properties questions, they all seem different and I struggle with each one :-(



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Problem Solving (PS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
User avatar
ravsg
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jan 2011
Last visit: 18 Dec 2015
Posts: 180
Own Kudos:
79
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 180
Kudos: 79
ANOTHER number properties question 06 Apr 2011, 16:40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Your explanation looks reasonable to me
Min value of p
=>(10 * 48)/96=5 is an integer
=> p = 48
=> p=2^4*3
So two prime number, 2 and 3
User avatar
Spidy001
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2011
Last visit: 16 Feb 2015
Posts: 298
Own Kudos:
360
Given Kudos: 42
Posts: 298
Kudos: 360
ANOTHER number properties question 06 Apr 2011, 18:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
minimum number of primes = 2

(i.e 2 , 3)
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 20 Sep 2026
Posts: 4,146
Own Kudos:
11,558
Given Kudos: 98
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
Posts: 4,146
Kudos: 11,558
ANOTHER number properties question 07 Apr 2011, 19:54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chloeholding
Having a lot of trouble with these number properties questions...

QUESTION: If p is a positive integer and 10p / 96 is an integer, then the minimum number of prime factors p could have is?

My method was to simplify 10p / 96 to 5p / 48 and then since 5 is not a factor of 48 conclude that p must be a multiple of 48 for the result to be an integer. And if p is a multiple of 48 the minimum it can be is 48, and in that case it must have the prime factors 2 and 3. Is that reasoning sound? I'm really fumbling around with the number properties questions, they all seem different and I struggle with each one :-(
Show more

Yes, your reasoning is perfect here. Number Theory is naturally going to seem more difficult than the other GMAT topics, since it's conceptual, you likely didn't study it before in any depth, and as you say, the questions are often very different one from the next, at least on the surface. Still, once you understand the importance of prime factorization and have a good approach to remainders questions, you have the conceptual foundation you'll need, and from your explanation above, it sounds like you're well on your way to getting there. Number Theory is often an important topic on the GMAT, so the time you're spending on it is likely to be worthwhile.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Problem Solving (PS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderator:
Bunuel
Math Expert
113775 posts