It is currently 18 Dec 2017, 06:57

Final Week of R1 Decisions:

CHAT Rooms | MIT Sloan | McCombs 


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 448

Kudos [?]: 315 [0], given: 6

At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2008, 07:49
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience

Kudos [?]: 315 [0], given: 6

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 633

Kudos [?]: 656 [0], given: 6

Re: democracy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2008, 08:24
IMO D
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Kudos [?]: 656 [0], given: 6

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2008
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: democracy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2008, 08:26
Answer: E

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 428

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 1

Re: democracy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2008, 08:40
Between C) and D) , I chose D)

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 76

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: democracy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2008, 09:13
IMO D

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 448

Kudos [?]: 315 [0], given: 6

Re: democracy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2008, 09:59
Guys can u explain as well?

Kudos [?]: 315 [0], given: 6

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 454 [0], given: 1

Re: democracy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2008, 10:09
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by

(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent

No impugn or no mention of credentials of opponent

(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle

No theoretical principle

(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”

Wrong answer but trap. Definition is not made.

(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view

Shows a different view of democracy. Possibly is the answer

(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience

Goes too far


D is my pick.

Kudos [?]: 454 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2008
Posts: 348

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Re: democracy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2008, 10:34
Nihit wrote:
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience


D for me - (D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
It reaveals the contradiction that the regulations are defended in the name of democracy; on the other hand, the core value of democracy being "freedom of speech" is restricted. Look at the word "although" to emphasize this.
_________________

To find what you seek in the road of life, the best proverb of all is that which says:
"Leave no stone unturned."
-Edward Bulwer Lytton

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 46

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: democracy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2008, 12:42
leonidas wrote:
Nihit wrote:
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience


D for me - (D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
It reaveals the contradiction that the regulations are defended in the name of democracy; on the other hand, the core value of democracy being "freedom of speech" is restricted. Look at the word "although" to emphasize this.


ditto !
D for me also

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 99

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Schools: Tuck, Duke
Re: democracy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2008, 13:48
one more vote for D

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: democracy   [#permalink] 01 Sep 2008, 13:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.