It is currently 11 Dec 2017, 12:09

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 244

Kudos [?]: 421 [3], given: 22

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 520 Q42 V19
GMAT 2: 540 Q44 V21
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 May 2011, 20:11
3
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

89% (00:53) correct 11% (01:07) wrong based on 2005 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. the chief executive is therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.

The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that
a) problems should be solved at levels in the management hierarchy at which they occur
b) employees should be rewarded for accurately reporting problems to their superiors
c) problems-solving ability is more important at higher levels than it is at lower levels of the management hierarchy
d) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from the no source other than their subordinates
e) some employees are more are concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors

[Reveal] Spoiler:
guys i find answer choice D as the most appropriate But i want to know the type of assumption it is and also how d can be the assumption.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

The proof of understanding is the ability to explain it.

Last edited by JarvisR on 19 Jul 2015, 01:30, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 421 [3], given: 22

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1268

Kudos [?]: 290 [0], given: 10

Re: Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 May 2011, 22:39
GMATD11 wrote:
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. the chief executive is therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.

The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that
a) problems should be solved at levels in the management hierarchy at which they occur -- making a suggestion. POE.
b) employees should be rewarded for accurately reporting problems to their superiors -- making a suggestion. POE.
c) problems-solving ability is more important at higher levels than it is at lower levels of the management hierarchy -- making a suggestion. POE.

d) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from the no source other than their subordinates -- Negate this, and if CEO get direct information then he/she is better informed than what is mentioned in the conclusion. Thus an answer choice.

e) some employees are more are concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors -- not discussed and negating it doesn't weaken the conclusion. POE.

guys i find answer choice D as the most appropriate But i want to know the type of assumption it is and also how d can be the assumption.

_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Kudos [?]: 290 [0], given: 10

Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 551

Kudos [?]: 248 [1], given: 13

Re: Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 May 2011, 23:08
1
KUDOS
GMATD11 wrote:
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. the chief executive is therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.

The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that
a) problems should be solved at levels in the management hierarchy at which they occur
b) employees should be rewarded for accurately reporting problems to their superiors
c) problems-solving ability is more important at higher levels than it is at lower levels of the management hierarchy
d) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from the no source other than their subordinates
e) some employees are more are concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors

guys i find answer choice D as the most appropriate But i want to know the type of assumption it is and also how d can be the assumption.

D is a supporter Assumption..The conclusion brings in the new piece of information "CEO".. so Use this in the answer choices

Kudos [?]: 248 [1], given: 13

VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1387

Kudos [?]: 171 [1], given: 916

Re: Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Aug 2011, 01:33
1
KUDOS
There are 2 kinds of assumptions which are explained in the book GMAT CRITICAL REASONING BIBLE by powerscore.

The 2 kinds are defender assumption and supporter assumption.

The problem is that negation test make clear the assumption.

in hard assumption questions in gmatprep va Manhantan, I normally see there are 2 choice, negation of both of which weakens the argument and can both be an assumption. However, only one is correct. Other choice is considered far. The example is question "bacteria on earth now" in gmatprep.

Kudos [?]: 171 [1], given: 916

Manager
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 191

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 1

Re: Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Aug 2011, 14:40
thangvietnam wrote:
There are 2 kinds of assumptions which are explained in the book GMAT CRITICAL REASONING BIBLE by powerscore.

The 2 kinds are defender assumption and supporter assumption.

The problem is that negation test make clear the assumption.

in hard assumption questions in gmatprep va Manhantan, I normally see there are 2 choice, negation of both of which weakens the argument and can both be an assumption. However, only one is correct. Other choice is considered far. The example is question "bacteria on earth now" in gmatprep.

Interesting...I pick D as well. The assumption is that the people at the top only gets their information from the bottom. Thus, if the bottom lies, the top doesn't get good intel.

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 1

Director
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 672

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 37

Re: Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Aug 2011, 18:29
+1 for D.

Crick

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 37

Manager
Status: Mission GMAT
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 88

Kudos [?]: 82 [6], given: 39

Re: Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Aug 2011, 05:33
6
KUDOS
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. the chief executive is therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.

The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that
a) problems should be solved at levels in the management hierarchy at which they occur
b) employees should be rewarded for accurately reporting problems to their superiors
c) problems-solving ability is more important at higher levels than it is at lower levels of the management hierarchy
d) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from the no source other than their subordinates
e) some employees are more are concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors

The assumption here is a logic gap assumption.
An assumption is what is absolutely necessary for the conclusion to be true. In short, an assumption is a hidden premise that bridges the gap between the premises and the conclusion.

Premise 1. No employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of the superior.
Premise 2. Hence, information about serious problems at lower levels is softened and distorted as it goes up the management ladder.
Conclusion: the CEO is less well informed about the problems at lower level than the sub-ordinates at that levels.

Premises say that information is softened by sub-ordinates. Conclusion says that the CEO is less well informed that sub-ordinates. Does it not assume that CEO is not informed by any other means than his sub-ordinates?

Try negating the choice D. The conclusion falls apart.
Negating is a good test on assumption questions.

Lets have a look at other choices.
A - problem solving is not discussed in the argument. though this seems like a real world solution, it is not in the scope of the argument and by no means is the assumption made to reason.
B - same as A. it is a solution. not an assumption
C - this is a trap choice! this is NOT an assumption. this might be true but this is not an assumption. even if problem solving ability were not more important at higher levels, this argument would remain valid.
D - correct answer as discussed above.
E - this assumption actually weakening the conclusion by challenging the premises. Remember, in CR assumption questions the validity of premises and conclusion cannot be challenged unless the question asks for a flaw in reasoning in which the assumption is put in a negative light!!
_________________

Hope this post helps!
Your kudos will let me know.

Kudos [?]: 82 [6], given: 39

Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 224

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 56

Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Aug 2012, 00:14
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. The chief executive is, therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.
The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that
(A) problems should be solved at the level in the management hierarchy at which they occur
(B) employees should be rewarded for accurately reporting problems to their superiors
(C) problem-solving ability is more important at higher levels than it is at lower levels of the management hierarchy
(D) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from no source other than their subordinates
(E) some employees are more concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors
_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 56

Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3411

Kudos [?]: 9461 [1], given: 1185

Re: Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Aug 2012, 11:45
1
KUDOS
PUNEETSCHDV wrote:
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. The chief executive is, therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.
The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that
(A) problems should be solved at the level in the management hierarchy at which they occur
(B) employees should be rewarded for accurately reporting problems to their superiors
(C) problem-solving ability is more important at higher levels than it is at lower levels of the management hierarchy
(D) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from no source other than their subordinates
(E) some employees are more concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors

Bold = premise

Red = conclusion

Assumption = only D is true for the conclusion

A) problem solving is not the point

B) employee rewarded is not the point

C) PS ability is more important is not the point

E) how employee are perceived is not the point

Kudos is this helps you
_________________

Kudos [?]: 9461 [1], given: 1185

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 303

Kudos [?]: 1279 [1], given: 2

Re: Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Aug 2012, 15:51
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
For this argument to hold true, the phrase, 'goes up each step in the hierarchy' must apply to the conclusion. However, unless the C.E.O. is getting his/her news from the person/s directly below him/her and that person/s directly below them, then distortion is not likely to happen. Meaning that if the C.E.O. hears bad news from someone far lower on the hierarchy the conclusion does not hold true. Therefore (D) works best.
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Kudos [?]: 1279 [1], given: 2

Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3411

Kudos [?]: 9461 [0], given: 1185

Re: Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Aug 2012, 17:12
Hi Chris

in your opinion this is a good CR question ?? and what is its real level ??

Thanks
_________________

Kudos [?]: 9461 [0], given: 1185

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2012
Posts: 186

Kudos [?]: 118 [1], given: 23

GMAT Date: 11-18-2012
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Jan 2013, 22:54
1
KUDOS
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. the chief executive is therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.

The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that

a) problems should be solved at levels in the management hierarchy at which they occur
b) employees should be rewarded for accurately reporting problems to their superiors
c) problems-solving ability is more important at higher levels than it is at lower levels of the management hierarchy
d) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from the no source other than their subordinates
e) some employees are more are concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors

How to approach above question by e-gmat way?
How to make logical structure and then pre-think?

Regards,
Aristocrat
_________________

Thriving for CHANGE

Kudos [?]: 118 [1], given: 23

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1375

Kudos [?]: 1720 [0], given: 62

Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Re: Because no employee wants to be associated [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Jan 2013, 00:29
Aristocrat wrote:
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. the chief executive is therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.

The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that

a) problems should be solved at levels in the management hierarchy at which they occur
b) employees should be rewarded for accurately reporting problems to their superiors
c) problems-solving ability is more important at higher levels than it is at lower levels of the management hierarchy
d) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from the no source other than their subordinates
e) some employees are more are concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors

How to approach above question by e-gmat way?
How to make logical structure and then pre-think?

Regards,
Aristocrat

A simple approach to assumption question can be:
Focus on the conclusion and the premise from which the conclusion is being led.
In this question, the premise just before the conclusion is :" information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy"
The conclusion is: "the chief executive is therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels".
So you see how the author has jumped from that premise to the conclusion.
The missing statement is clearly the choice D.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1720 [0], given: 62

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2384

Kudos [?]: 9421 [1], given: 347

Re: Because no employee wants to be associated [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Feb 2013, 19:15
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Aristocrat wrote:
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. the chief executive is therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.

The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that

a) problems should be solved at levels in the management hierarchy at which they occur
b) employees should be rewarded for accurately reporting problems to their superiors
c) problems-solving ability is more important at higher levels than it is at lower levels of the management hierarchy
d) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from the no source other than their subordinates
e) some employees are more are concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors

How to approach above question by e-gmat way?
How to make logical structure and then pre-think?

Regards,
Aristocrat

Hi,

The first step in the process is understanding the passage or drawing a logical structure. The argument structure is of the form A->B->C. Let's draw it:

No employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior ------------>>>> information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy ----------------->>>>>>> the chief executive is less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.

Does the argument make sense? It says that employees don't want to be associated with bad news; so, they distort the bad news when they report to higher levels. Now, this means that chief executive would be less well informed about problems than his juniors (this is because the distortion in information increase as the information travels up the heirarchy).

Now, in these kind of causal arguments A->B: we need to consider all the statements which could break this relationship and negation of such statements would be assumption (since our conclusion is that the relation A->B holds, so anything which prevents such relationship, we assume it not to be true)

Now, if you can pre-think an assumption in this case, do it; if not, just move on to the options. However, for understanding purpose, let's see how prethinking can be done here:

Is there a way chief executive knows as well as his juniors even though information is distorted as it travels up?

The answer could be that if he has some other source of information than his immediate juniors. In this case, he'll probably know as well or better than his juniors.

Therefore the assumption for the conclusion to hold, would be that Chief executive has no other source of information than his juniors.

This is what is expressed by option D, which is the correct choice.

Hope this helps

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Kudos [?]: 9421 [1], given: 347

Manager
Joined: 31 May 2012
Posts: 157

Kudos [?]: 202 [1], given: 69

Re: Because no employee wants to be associated [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Feb 2013, 20:39
1
KUDOS
Aristocrat wrote:
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. the chief executive is therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.

The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that

a) problems should be solved at levels in the management hierarchy at which they occur
b) employees should be rewarded for accurately reporting problems to their superiors
c) problems-solving ability is more important at higher levels than it is at lower levels of the management hierarchy
d) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from the no source other than their subordinates
e) some employees are more are concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors

I liked the explanation by e-GMAT. Adding to this..

The assumption here is a logic gap assumption.
An assumption is what is absolutely necessary for the conclusion to be true. In short, an assumption is a hidden premise that bridges the gap between the premises and the conclusion.

Premise 1.
No employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of the superior.
Premise 2.
Hence, information about serious problems at lower levels is softened and distorted as it goes up the management ladder.
Conclusion:
The CEO is less well informed about the problems at lower level than the sub-ordinates at that levels.

Premises say that information is softened by sub-ordinates. Conclusion says that the CEO is less well informed that sub-ordinates. Does it not assume that CEO is not informed by any other means than his sub-ordinates? Option D opens up the answer for this question.
----------------------------
press kudos if this helps

Last edited by umeshpatil on 03 Feb 2013, 22:38, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 202 [1], given: 69

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 285

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 75

Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Re: Because no employee wants to be associated [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Feb 2013, 22:24
Aristocrat wrote:
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. the chief executive is therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.

The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that

a) problems should be solved at levels in the management hierarchy at which they occur
b) employees should be rewarded for accurately reporting problems to their superiors
c) problems-solving ability is more important at higher levels than it is at lower levels of the management hierarchy
d) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from the no source other than their subordinates
e) some employees are more are concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors

How to approach above question by e-gmat way?
How to make logical structure and then pre-think?

Regards,
Aristocrat

Premise:
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy.

Conclusion: the chief executive is therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.

Assumption: chief executive do not get the information about serious problems from any other source than subordinates.

Option: D states the same. You can confirm this option by Negation test as well.
_________________

YOU CAN, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 75

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 457

Kudos [?]: 569 [2], given: 11

Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23
Re: Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Feb 2013, 01:28
2
KUDOS
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. the chief executive is therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.

a) problems should be solved at levels in the management hierarchy at which they occur
this is not about what needs to be done.. irrelevant... the issue is whether the chief executive know any less than his or her subordinates...

b) employees should be rewarded for accurately reporting problems to their superiors
same as a... not the issue...

c) problems-solving ability is more important at higher levels than it is at lower levels of the management hierarchy
the issue is whether the chief executive is any less informed.. out...

d) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from the no source other than their subordinates
bingo! if there are other sources then the conclusion is not solid...

e) some employees are more are concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors
if so, then the author shouldn't conclude that the chief executive will know less... if they are not that concerned about how they are percieved.. opposite... out
_________________

Impossible is nothing to God.

Kudos [?]: 569 [2], given: 11

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10154

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Re: Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Jun 2014, 04:22
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10154

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Re: Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Jan 2016, 15:36
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2015
Posts: 50

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 309

Schools: Sloan '19
Re: Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Mar 2016, 06:06
alicegmat wrote:
Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of a superior, information about serious problems at lower levels is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy. the chief executive is therefore, less well informed about problems at lower levels than are his or her subordinates at those levels.

The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that
a) problems should be solved at levels in the management hierarchy at which they occur
b) employees should be rewarded for accurately reporting problems to their superiors
c) problems-solving ability is more important at higher levels than it is at lower levels of the management hierarchy
d) chief executives obtain information about problems at lower levels from the no source other than their subordinates
e) some employees are more are concerned about truth than about the way they are perceived by their superiors

The assumption here is a logic gap assumption.
An assumption is what is absolutely necessary for the conclusion to be true. In short, an assumption is a hidden premise that bridges the gap between the premises and the conclusion.

Premise 1. No employee wants to be associated with bad news in the eyes of the superior.
Premise 2. Hence, information about serious problems at lower levels is softened and distorted as it goes up the management ladder.
Conclusion: the CEO is less well informed about the problems at lower level than the sub-ordinates at that levels.

Premises say that information is softened by sub-ordinates. Conclusion says that the CEO is less well informed that sub-ordinates. Does it not assume that CEO is not informed by any other means than his sub-ordinates?

Try negating the choice D. The conclusion falls apart.
Negating is a good test on assumption questions.

Lets have a look at other choices.
A - problem solving is not discussed in the argument. though this seems like a real world solution, it is not in the scope of the argument and by no means is the assumption made to reason.
B - same as A. it is a solution. not an assumption
C - this is a trap choice! this is NOT an assumption. this might be true but this is not an assumption. even if problem solving ability were not more important at higher levels, this argument would remain valid.
D - correct answer as discussed above.
E - this assumption actually weakening the conclusion by challenging the premises. Remember, in CR assumption questions the validity of premises and conclusion cannot be challenged unless the question asks for a flaw in reasoning in which the assumption is put in a negative light!!

IMO , there is no gap in the argument.
The argument states how the information is progressively softened and distorted as it goes up each step in the management hierarchy and finally concludes how the CEO is less well informed.
Hence , the correct answer "C" works as "defender assumption".

daagh , chetan2U.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 309

Re: Because no employee wants to be associated with bad news in   [#permalink] 17 Mar 2016, 06:06

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 29 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by