Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Enter The Economist GMAT Tutor’s Brightest Minds competition – it’s completely free! All you have to do is take our online GMAT simulation test and put your mind to the test. Are you ready? This competition closes on December 13th.
Attend a Veritas Prep GMAT Class for Free. With free trial classes you can work with a 99th percentile expert free of charge. Learn valuable strategies and find your new favorite instructor; click for a list of upcoming dates and teachers.
Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? e-GMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days.
Re: Hundred's digit of sum of numbers
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jan 2012, 12:05
2
Both a, b, and c are 3-digits integers, where a=b+c. Is the hundreds' digit of number a equal to sum of that of b and c?
Hundreds digit of \(a\) will equal to the sum of hundreds digits of \(b\) and \(c\) if there is no carried over 1 from the sum of the tens digits of \(b\) and \(c\). To illustrate:
149=b 249=b --- 398=a As you can see there is no carried over 1 from the sum of 4+4+1=9 (1 is carried over from the sum of units digits) and thus hundreds digit of \(a\) equal to the sum of hundreds digits of \(b\) and \(c\): 3=1+2;
But if: 170=b 240=b --- 410=a As you can see there is a carried over 1 from the sum of 7+4=11 and thus hundreds digit of \(a\) doesn't equal to the sum of hundreds digits of \(b\) and \(c\): \(4\neq{1+2}.\)
(1) Tens' digit of a=tens' digit of b+tens' digit of c --> there can not be carried over 1 from this sum as it must be less than 10 to equal to tens' digit of \(a\). Sufficient.
(2) Units' digit of a=units' digit of b+units' digit of c. Clearly insufficient as no info about tens digits.
If a, b, and c are 3-digit positive integers, where a=b+c,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 25 Jun 2013, 05:09
If a, b, and c are 3-digit positive integers, where a=b+c, is the hundreds' digit of a equal to the hundreds' digit of b plus the hundreds' digit of c?
(1) The tens' digit of a is equal to the tens digit of b plus the tens' digit of c. (2) The units' digit of a is equal to the units' digit of b plus the units' digit of c.
Re: If a, b, and c are 3-digit positive integers, where a=b+c,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Jun 2013, 17:26
2
stunn3r wrote:
If a, b, and c are 3-digit positive integers, where a=b+c, is the hundreds' digit of a equal to the hundreds' digit of b plus the hundreds' digit of c? (1) The tens' digit of a is equal to the tens digit of b plus the tens' digit of c. (2) The units' digit of a is equal to the units' digit of b plus the units' digit of c.
What is the source of this question?
The sum of the hundred's digits of a & b will equal the hundred's digit of c if nothing "carries" from the tens column. 123 + 351 = 474 123 + 358 = 481 Both of those lead to "yes" answer to the prompt question. In order for statement #1 to be true, it must be true that nothing carries from the ones column to the tens column (only the first of the two example addition statements satisfies this) --- thus, statement #1 automatically implies statement #2. That's why statement #1, by itself, is sufficient --- it already completely contains the information in statement #2. That's why (A) has to be the answer.
In other words, I am claiming that it is utterly impossible to find numbers that satisfy both the prompt condition and statement #1 but not statement #2. In order for (C) to be the answer, there would have to be a case in which you could add two three digit numbers which met statement #1, did not meet statement #2, and the three-digit sum did not work out neatly in the hundreds column. You would have to able to find such a case, and I claim that finding such a case is impossible. That's why (C) can't be the answer.
Re: If a, b, and c are 3-digit positive integers, where a=b+c,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jun 2013, 02:00
mikemcgarry wrote:
stunn3r wrote:
If a, b, and c are 3-digit positive integers, where a=b+c, is the hundreds' digit of a equal to the hundreds' digit of b plus the hundreds' digit of c? (1) The tens' digit of a is equal to the tens digit of b plus the tens' digit of c. (2) The units' digit of a is equal to the units' digit of b plus the units' digit of c.
What is the source of this question?
The sum of the hundred's digits of a & b will equal the hundred's digit of c if nothing "carries" from the tens column. 123 + 351 = 474 123 + 358 = 481 Both of those lead to "yes" answer to the prompt question. In order for statement #1 to be true, it must be true that nothing carries from the ones column to the tens column (only the first of the two example addition statements satisfies this) --- thus, statement #1 automatically implies statement #2. That's why statement #1, by itself, is sufficient --- it already completely contains the information in statement #2. That's why (A) has to be the answer.
In other words, I am claiming that it is utterly impossible to find numbers that satisfy both the prompt condition and statement #1 but not statement #2. In order for (C) to be the answer, there would have to be a case in which you could add two three digit numbers which met statement #1, did not meet statement #2, and the three-digit sum did not work out neatly in the hundreds column. You would have to able to find such a case, and I claim that finding such a case is impossible. That's why (C) can't be the answer.
Does all this make sense? Mike
hmm .. true .. Thanks mike .. I figured it out when I retried the question but your explanation made it more clear.
I've this hard copy of 200 mixed bag questions .. these are good concept building and "makes you scratch your head a little" type questions. I am posting all which I think would give something to learn to forum members and the questions which I get wrong I did first 40 of this set yesterday and posted around 7-8 questions. will post more, keep answering.
Re: If a, b, and c are 3-digit positive integers, where a=b+c,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Jul 2013, 13:06
stunn3r wrote:
If a, b, and c are 3-digit positive integers, where a=b+c, is the hundreds' digit of a equal to the hundreds' digit of b plus the hundreds' digit of c?
(1) The tens' digit of a is equal to the tens digit of b plus the tens' digit of c. (2) The units' digit of a is equal to the units' digit of b plus the units' digit of c.
Re: Both a, b, and c are 3-digits integers, where a=b+c. Is the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Mar 2019, 07:42
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
close
61% (01:44) correct 
and the questions which I get wrong 
