It is currently 11 Dec 2017, 04:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Demographers doing research for an international economics

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 03 Feb 2010
Posts: 66

Kudos [?]: 74 [4], given: 4

Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2010, 19:56
4
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

63% (01:35) correct 37% (01:58) wrong based on 440 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton.They also claim,however,that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala,over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty.At least one of the demographer's claim must,therefore be wrong.

the argument above is most vunerable to which of the following criticism ?

1.It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.

2.It treats the vague term "poverty" as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning.

3.It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.

4.It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in kuptala as in bahlton.

5.It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala , unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country's average per capita income.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 74 [4], given: 4

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 953

Kudos [?]: 930 [0], given: 36

Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Re: CR : Weaken (demographers claim average per capita income) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2010, 21:33
Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton.They also claim,however,that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala,over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty.At least one of the demographer's claim must,therefore be wrong.

P1 : Per ca pita income of K < B
P2 : Poverty is rare in K but half the population of B live in extreme poverty
Conclusion : One of the premises (claims) is wrong.

Well this argument is flawed because its making a hasty generalization. If the incomes (per ca pita income) in K are close to country's average then K is indeed prosperous. hence E.

A : This is NOT the case. The argument offers evidence. The problem is that it ignores a vital assumption that the country's average income can be close to per capita income of the country it claims to be poor.
B : The term "poverty" is unambiguous.
C : It does not critiques the argument.
D : No bearing on the argument. Irrelevant

Kudos [?]: 930 [0], given: 36

Director
Status: Apply - Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Posts: 679

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 15

Schools: Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&Gas
Re: CR : Weaken (demographers claim average per capita income) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2010, 22:52
So is poverty unambiguous because it is taken to mean less than per capita income?
_________________

Consider kudos, they are good for health

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 15

Manager
Joined: 03 Feb 2010
Posts: 66

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 4

Re: CR : Weaken (demographers claim average per capita income) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2010, 02:04
nusmavrik wrote:
Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton.They also claim,however,that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala,over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty.At least one of the demographer's claim must,therefore be wrong.

P1 : Per ca pita income of K < B
P2 : Poverty is rare in K but half the population of B live in extreme poverty
Conclusion : One of the premises (claims) is wrong.

Well this argument is flawed because its making a hasty generalization. If the incomes (per ca pita income) in K are close to country's average then K is indeed prosperous. hence E.

A : This is NOT the case. The argument offers evidence. The problem is that it ignores a vital assumption that the country's average income can be close to per capita income of the country it claims to be poor.
B : The term "poverty" is unambiguous.
C : It does not critiques the argument.
D : No bearing on the argument. Irrelevant

could you define the term "per capita income" and "country average" ??

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 4

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 953

Kudos [?]: 930 [0], given: 36

Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Re: CR : Weaken (demographers claim average per capita income) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2010, 10:28
Well per capita income is income per unit of population.

The choice E means that the argument fails to consider the fact that the incomes of people of Kuptala is close to the national average (arithmetic mean) income. Hence poverty is rare in Kuputala compared with that in Bahlton. Hence both the demographers can be true.

5.It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala , unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country's average per capita income.

sushma0805 wrote:

could you define the term "per capita income" and "country average" ??

Kudos [?]: 930 [0], given: 36

Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 105

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Weaken (demographers claim average per capita income) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2010, 14:12
E IMO

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 456

Kudos [?]: 176 [0], given: 24

Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Other)
Re: CR : Weaken (demographers claim average per capita income) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2010, 01:09
Nice!!
_________________

Kidchaos

http://www.laptopskinvault.com

Follow The Laptop Skin Vault on:

Consider Kudos if you think the Post is good
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to change. It's not. - Dr. Seuss

Kudos [?]: 176 [0], given: 24

Intern
Joined: 21 Jun 2013
Posts: 42

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 129

Re: CR : Weaken (demographers claim average per capita income) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2013, 10:44
nusmavrik wrote:
P1 : Per ca pita income of K < B
P2 : Poverty is rare in K but half the population of B live in extreme poverty
Conclusion : One of the premises (claims) is wrong.

Well this argument is flawed because its making a hasty generalization. If the incomes (per ca pita income) in K are close to country's average then K is indeed prosperous. hence E.

C : It does not critiques the argument.

Hi! Could you please elaborate on "C : It does not critiques the argument"?

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 129

Manager
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 34

Location: India
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2013, 11:24
E, Per capita income is the average income for year. So only option E correctly critiques the conclusion.

Option E, correctly critiques the argument by pointing out, that the income of most of the people is very close to the average income(per capita);hence, the claims of both demographer's will hold.
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 34

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10153

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2015, 11:19
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10153

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2017, 06:58
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics   [#permalink] 23 Apr 2017, 06:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by