GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 24 Jun 2018, 17:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Despite the fact that the health-inspection procedures for

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 270
Despite the fact that the health-inspection procedures for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2008, 17:57
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Despite the fact that the health-inspection procedures for catering establishment are more stringent than those for ordinary restaurants, more of the cases of food poisoning reported to the city health department were brought on by banquets served by catering services than were brought on my restaurant meals.

Which of the following, if true, helps explain the apparent paradox in the statement above?

a. A significantly larger number of people eat in restaurants than attend catered banquets in any given time period.
b. Catering establishments know how many people they expect to serve, and therefore are less likely than restaurants to have, and serve, leftover food, a major source of food poisoning.
c. Many restaurants provide catering services for banquets in addition to serving individual meals.
d. The number of reported food-poisioning cases at catered baquets is unrelated to whether the meal is served on the caterer’s or the client’s premises.
e. People are unlikely to make a connection between a meal they have eaten and a subsequent illness unless the illness strikes a group who are in communication with one another.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 265
Location: Motortown

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2008, 18:38
I would go with C

stallone wrote:
Despite the fact that the health-inspection procedures for catering establishment are more stringent than those for ordinary restaurants, more of the cases of food poisoning reported to the city health department were brought on by banquets served by catering services than were brought on my restaurant meals.

Which of the following, if true, helps explain the apparent paradox in the statement above?

a. A significantly larger number of people eat in restaurants than attend catered banquets in any given time period. Does not help
b. Catering establishments know how many people they expect to serve, and therefore are less likely than restaurants to have, and serve, leftover food, a major source of food poisoning. Can't be true, because of stringent health-inspection procedures
c. Many restaurants provide catering services for banquets in addition to serving individual meals. My Answer
d. The number of reported food-poisioning cases at catered baquets is unrelated to whether the meal is served on the caterer’s or the client’s premises. Out of scope
e. People are unlikely to make a connection between a meal they have eaten and a subsequent illness unless the illness strikes a group who are in communication with one another. Out of scope
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1337

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2008, 18:38
stallone wrote:
Despite the fact that the health-inspection procedures for catering establishment are more stringent than those for ordinary restaurants, more of the cases of food poisoning reported to the city health department were brought on by banquets served by catering services than were brought on my restaurant meals.

Which of the following, if true, helps explain the apparent paradox in the statement above?

a. A significantly larger number of people eat in restaurants than attend catered banquets in any given time period.
b. Catering establishments know how many people they expect to serve, and therefore are less likely than restaurants to have, and serve, leftover food, a major source of food poisoning.
c. Many restaurants provide catering services for banquets in addition to serving individual meals.
d. The number of reported food-poisioning cases at catered baquets is unrelated to whether the meal is served on the caterer’s or the client’s premises.
e. People are unlikely to make a connection between a meal they have eaten and a subsequent illness unless the illness strikes a group who are in communication with one another.

# of FP cases from Catering > # of FP cases from Restaurants

Rules for C >>>> Rules for R

How?

C is perfect. If a lot of restaurants are doing catering, they possibly are contributing to the increased number in FP cases by banquet meals.
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 457
Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2008, 14:29
Hi guys,

IMO E

a. A significantly larger number of people eat in restaurants than attend catered banquets in any given time period. it doesn't say anything about the paradox
b. Catering establishments know how many people they expect to serve, and therefore are less likely than restaurants to have, and serve, leftover food, a major source of food poisoning. it doesn't say anything about the paradox
c. Many restaurants provide catering services for banquets in addition to serving individual meals. some of you picked this one. For me this answer explains why restaurants report more poisoning cases
d. The number of reported food-poisioning cases at catered baquets is unrelated to whether the meal is served on the caterer’s or the client’s premises. nothing to do with the paradox
e. People are unlikely to make a connection between a meal they have eaten and a subsequent illness unless the illness strikes a group who are in communication with one another. For me, this is the right one. Let's imagine that there are the same neumber of cases both in restaurants and banquets. While people who were poisoned in restuarants do not say anything because they are not sure where they ate the bad-state food, people who were poisoned in banquets are able to make a clear conection.

OA and source?

Thanks
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package

My experience in my second attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312
My experience in my third attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

Intern
Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Posts: 43
Location: New York, NY

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2008, 15:04
IMO E.
Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 58

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2008, 01:23
E as well.
Manager
Joined: 18 Nov 2008
Posts: 109

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2008, 02:14
Why D is out of scope? It's possible that client's premises are on the blame
Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 181

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2008, 09:40
stallone wrote:
Despite the fact that the health-inspection procedures for catering establishment are more stringent than those for ordinary restaurants, more of the cases of food poisoning reported to the city health department were brought on by banquets served by catering services than were brought on my restaurant meals.

Which of the following, if true, helps explain the apparent paradox in the statement above?

a. A significantly larger number of people eat in restaurants than attend catered banquets in any given time period.--------number of people does not explain the paradox the stringency of checks is in question here not the number of people in diff categories
b. Catering establishments know how many people they expect to serve, and therefore are less likely than restaurants to have, and serve, leftover food, a major source of food poisoning.------this rather strengthens the case of catering establishments[color=#000080][/color]
c. Many restaurants provide catering services for banquets in addition to serving individual meals.this helps solve the paradox in the best manner less stringently checked food is findng its way in the larger pool of catering food which has better checking process
d. The number of reported food-poisioning cases at catered baquets is unrelated to whether the meal is served on the caterer’s or the client’s premises.doesnt really matter where the food is served doesn t help to resolve the paradox
e. People are unlikely to make a connection between a meal they have eaten and a subsequent illness unless the illness strikes a group who are in communication with one another. don t think this makes any sense in the context of solving the paradox. If i have an illness i go to the doctor doctor tests me and tells me I have either A B or C ailment. the reason for being in communication with others does not arise

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Re: cr   [#permalink] 22 Nov 2008, 09:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Despite the fact that the health-inspection procedures for

Moderators: GMATNinja, GMATNinjaTwo

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.