Statement 1 on its own is not sufficient. This is because it says m/14=k, where k is a positive integer.
The minimum value of m that satisfy this condition is 14 and it has 2 and 7 as prime factors. When m=14 the answer is No.
However when m=210, the prime factors of m are 2,3,5, and 7. The answer in this case however is Yes. Hence not sufficient.
Statement also states that m/15=x, where x is a positive integer.
And the least possible value of m=15. 15 has 3 and 5 as prime factors. The answer to the question when m=15 is No.
However when m=210, which also satisfy the condition in statement 1, there are four prime factors of m, which are 2,3,5, and 7 and the answer to the question posed in the question stem in this case is yes. Hence statement 2 is also not sufficient on its own.
Taking both statements together, we need a value of m which satisfy both conditions, i.e. m/14=k and m/15=x, where k and x are positive integers. We get the minimum value of m to be 14*15=210.
And 210 has four prime factors i.e. 2,3,5, and 7.
Considering 210 is the least possible value of m that satisfy the two conditions, we can answer Yes to the question, does m have at least 4 prime factors.
The answer is therefore C.
Posted from my mobile device