Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 0408:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare.
May 2910:00 AM IST
-11:00 PM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.- Jun 03
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line - Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
30 Jan 2014, 10:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
I just wanted to confirm my understanding of a topic as I think I might have seen differing definitions for this subject before. (A credible source would help me here as well.)
So, the FACTORS of the number 189 are 1, 3, 7, 9, 21, 27, 63, 189, which does NOT take into account that 189's prime factorization includes multiple 3's.
The PRIME FACTORS of the number 189 are a subset of its factors, which would be 3 and 7, which does not take into account repetition of 3's, right?
By these definitions, is the term 'DIFFERENT' prime factors essentially repetitive? 2*2*3*2 would have 2 prime factors and so would 2*3, yes?
So, the FACTORS of the number 189 are 1, 3, 7, 9, 21, 27, 63, 189, which does NOT take into account that 189's prime factorization includes multiple 3's.
The PRIME FACTORS of the number 189 are a subset of its factors, which would be 3 and 7, which does not take into account repetition of 3's, right?
By these definitions, is the term 'DIFFERENT' prime factors essentially repetitive? 2*2*3*2 would have 2 prime factors and so would 2*3, yes?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
30 Jan 2014, 11:54
Kudos
Bookmarks
bekerman
Dear bekerman,
I'm happy to help.
First of all, here's a post you may find helpful.
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-math-factors/
The factors of 189 are, as you say, {1, 3, 7, 9, 21, 27, 63, 189}. Eight total factors, including 1 (the universal factor) and the number 189 itself.
The prime factorization of 189 is 189 = 3*3*3*7 = (3^3)*7
The question "how many prime factors does 189 have?" is potentially ambiguous --- it has four total prime factors, but only two are distinct. (Mathematicians use the word "distinct" to mean "different.") The GMAT itself will not ask that question.
The question, "how many distinct prime factors does 189 have?" is a clear question with a clear answer: 189 has two distinct prime factors, 3 and 7. The numbers 21, 63, 147, etc. all have the same two distinct prime factors that 189 has.
The prime factorization of each positive integer greater than 1 is unique. It's like the DNA of the number --- if you know N's prime factorization, you know all the potential factors of N. The list of distinct prime factors of a number is not unique --- as we saw, 21, 63, 147, 189, and many more have the exact same list of distinct prime factors. Knowing that N has two distinct prime factors, 3 and 5, does not tell us what N is, but it does let us know a great deal about divisibility and related properties (N must be odd, N is not divisible by 7 or 11, etc. )
Does all this make sense?
Mike
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
