It is currently 20 Feb 2018, 09:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 191
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2009, 07:38
snipertrader wrote:
How would you negate D?

Language requires the use of verbal signs for objects as well as for feelings. Many animals can vocally express hunger, but only humans can ask for an egg or an apple by naming it. And using verbal signs for objects requires the ability to distinguish these objects from other objects, which in turn requires conceptual thought.


1. Language requires the use of verbal signs.
2. only humans can ask for an egg or an apple by naming it.
3. using verbal signs for objects requires the ability to distinguish these objects from other objects
4. which in turn requires conceptual thought.

#2 says only humans can use verbal signs ---- it does not say all humans can use verbal signs.

Saying "all humans" is a generalization that is not necessarily true in the question at hand.

And in fact, is not true in reality; not all humans are capable of "speaking".

In GMAT the word "all" should raise caution in test takers.
_________________

Please kudos if my post helps.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 9
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2009, 23:24
powerka wrote:
Franklin wrote:
Quote:
Reza: Language requires the use of verbal signs for objects as well as for feelings. Many animals can vocally express hunger, but only humans can ask for an egg or an apple by naming it. And using verbal signs for objects requires the ability to distinguish these objects from other objects, which in turn requires conceptual thought.

If all of Reza's statements are true, then which one of the following must also be true?

A) Conceptual thought is required for language

B) Conceptual thought requires the use of verbal signs for objects.

C) It is not possible to think conceptually about feelings.

D) All humans are capable of conceptual thought.

E) The vocal expressions of animals other than humans do not require conceptual thought.


Language <---- verbal signs <---- ability to distinguish <---- conceptual thought.

I say answer is A


even i would go with A.

The logic that can be applied here is that whenever there is a cause and effect type of question, then u need to draw them.
Moving backward,


here, CT ( conceptual thought) -> Ability to distinguish -> verbal signs -> language.

thus, CT -> Language.

in a must be true ques or a conclusion, the sufficient condition ie the language must occur when the necessary condition ie the CT has occured.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 186
Location: Ithaca, New York
Schools: Cornell University - The Johnson School
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2009, 09:43
Quote:
The ability to access information via computer is a tremendous resource for visually impaired people. Only a limited amount of printed information is accessible in braille, large type, or audiotape. But a person with the right hardware and software can access a large quantity of information from libraries and museums around the world, and can have the computer read the information aloud, display it in large type, or produce a braille version. Thus, visually impaired people can now access information from computers more easily than they can from most traditional sources.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A) A computerized speech synthesizer is often less expensive than a complete library of audiotapes.

B) Relatively easy-to-use computer systems that can read information aloud, display it in large type, or produce a braille version of it are widely available.

C) Many visually impaired people prefer traditional sources of information to computers that can read information aloud, display it in large type, or produce a braille version of it.

D) Most visually impaired people who have access to information via computer also have access to this same information via more traditional sources.

E) The rate at which printed information is converted into formats easily accessible to visually impaired people will increase.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 186
Location: Ithaca, New York
Schools: Cornell University - The Johnson School
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2009, 09:57
This one will cause some heartburn! :-D

Quote:
Political Scientist: The economies of a number of European countries are currently in severe difficulty. Germany is the only neighboring country that has the resources to resuscitate these economies. Therefore, Germany should begin aiding these economically troubled countries.

Which one of the following principles most helps to justify the political scientist's reasoning?

A) Any nation that alone has an obligation to economically resuscitate neighboring countries ought to be the only nation to provide any economic aid.

B) Any nation that alone has the capacity to economically resuscitate neighboring countries should exercise that capacity.

C) Any nation that can afford to give economic aid to just a few other nations ought to aid just those few.

D) Only nations that alone have the capacity to economically resuscitate neighboring countries should exercise that capacity.

E) Only nations that can afford to give economic aid to just a few other nations ought to aid just those few.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 9
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2009, 11:34
i think that the answer is B for both of them.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 191
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2009, 08:50
I agree with the previous poster: B for both.
_________________

Please kudos if my post helps.

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 538
WE 1: Investment Banking - 6yrs
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2009, 12:43
Franklin wrote:
Quote:
The ability to access information via computer is a tremendous resource for visually impaired people. Only a limited amount of printed information is accessible in braille, large type, or audiotape. But a person with the right hardware and software can access a large quantity of information from libraries and museums around the world, and can have the computer read the information aloud, display it in large type, or produce a braille version. Thus, visually impaired people can now access information from computers more easily than they can from most traditional sources.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A) A computerized speech synthesizer is often less expensive than a complete library of audiotapes.

B) Relatively easy-to-use computer systems that can read information aloud, display it in large type, or produce a braille version of it are widely available.

C) Many visually impaired people prefer traditional sources of information to computers that can read information aloud, display it in large type, or produce a braille version of it.

D) Most visually impaired people who have access to information via computer also have access to this same information via more traditional sources.

E) The rate at which printed information is converted into formats easily accessible to visually impaired people will increase.


I get B
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 538
WE 1: Investment Banking - 6yrs
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2009, 12:44
Franklin wrote:
This one will cause some heartburn! :-D

Quote:
Political Scientist: The economies of a number of European countries are currently in severe difficulty. Germany is the only neighboring country that has the resources to resuscitate these economies. Therefore, Germany should begin aiding these economically troubled countries.

Which one of the following principles most helps to justify the political scientist's reasoning?

A) Any nation that alone has an obligation to economically resuscitate neighboring countries ought to be the only nation to provide any economic aid.

B) Any nation that alone has the capacity to economically resuscitate neighboring countries should exercise that capacity.

C) Any nation that can afford to give economic aid to just a few other nations ought to aid just those few.

D) Only nations that alone have the capacity to economically resuscitate neighboring countries should exercise that capacity.

E) Only nations that can afford to give economic aid to just a few other nations ought to aid just those few.


I eliminated A,D & E - because of the usage of "only"
Not sure with B & C...on the exam, I'd go with B.
1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 186
Location: Ithaca, New York
Schools: Cornell University - The Johnson School
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2009, 17:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
Quote:
In addition to the labor and materials used to make wine, the reputation of the vineyard where the grapes originate plays a role in determining the price of the finished wine. Therefore, an expensive wine is not always a good wine.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) The price of a bottle of wine should be a reflection of the wine's quality.

B) Price is never an accurate indication of the quality of a bottle of wine.

C) The reputation of a vineyard does not always indicate the quality of its wines.

D) The reputation of a vineyard generally plays a greater role than the quality of its grapes in determining its wines' prices.

E) Wines produced by lesser-known vineyards generally are priced to reflect accurately the wines' quality.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 9
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2009, 23:33
In addition to the labor and materials used to make wine, the reputation of the vineyard where the grapes originate plays a role in determining the price of the finished wine. Therefore, an expensive wine is not always a good wine.

i think the answer is C.

Because if the reputation plays a role in determining the price, then the expensive wine must have originated from a reputed vineyard. Also the conclusion states that an expensive wine is not always a good wine. The assumption connecting these two is answer C that the reputation does not mean quality ( here quality is used in place of good wine).
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 191
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2009, 04:34
1
This post received
KUDOS
I say C.
_________________

Please kudos if my post helps.

Expert Post
Founder
Founder
User avatar
D
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 16489
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2009, 20:33
Franklin - just wanted to say - great job!
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

Just starting out with GMAT? Start here... or use our Daily Study Plan


Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 186
Location: Ithaca, New York
Schools: Cornell University - The Johnson School
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2009, 04:02
bb wrote:
Franklin - just wanted to say - great job!


Thanks bb! I appreciate your support!

Sorry everyone about not posting for a little while. Midterms are coming up and the workload is kicking my rear end. I'll make it up to you guys by posting a couple every other day or so .... Here we go!

Quote:
Most plants have developed chemical defenses against parasites. The average plant contains about 40 natural pesticides - chemical compounds toxic to bacteria, fungi, and other parasites. Humans ingest these natural pesticides without harm every day. Therefore, the additional threat posed by synthetic pesticides sprayed on crop plants by humans is minimal.

Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument EXCEPT:

A) Humans have been consuming natural plant pesticides from millennia and have had time to adapt to them.

B) The concentrations of natural pesticides in plants are typically much lower than the concentrations of synthetic pesticides in sprayed crop plants.

C) Natural plant pesticides are typically less potent than synthetic pesticides, whose toxicity is highly concentrated.

D) Natural plant pesticides generally serve only as defenses against specific parasites, whereas synthetic pesticides are often harmful to a wide variety of organisms.

E) The synthetic pesticides sprayed on crop plants by humans usually have chemical structures similar to those of the natural pesticides produced by the plants.
3 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 186
Location: Ithaca, New York
Schools: Cornell University - The Johnson School
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2009, 04:14
3
This post received
KUDOS
Remember everyone to please put your reasoning. You don't have to do it for every answer choice just for the answer you choose. This will help everyone reading this thread to see your logic behind the choice.

As you can tell I give out Kudos like they're going out of style. Besides the well-deserved praise from your peers and the blessings from the GMAT gods for posting your reasoning, I may shower you with kudos for your effort ... just a little extra incentive for those who care about that sort of thing! :wink:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 191
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2009, 16:31
Franklin wrote:
Quote:
Most plants have developed chemical defenses against parasites. The average plant contains about 40 natural pesticides - chemical compounds toxic to bacteria, fungi, and other parasites. Humans ingest these natural pesticides without harm every day. Therefore, the additional threat posed by synthetic pesticides sprayed on crop plants by humans is minimal.

Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument EXCEPT:

A) Humans have been consuming natural plant pesticides from millennia and have had time to adapt to them.

B) The concentrations of natural pesticides in plants are typically much lower than the concentrations of synthetic pesticides in sprayed crop plants.

C) Natural plant pesticides are typically less potent than synthetic pesticides, whose toxicity is highly concentrated.

D) Natural plant pesticides generally serve only as defenses against specific parasites, whereas synthetic pesticides are often harmful to a wide variety of organisms.

E) The synthetic pesticides sprayed on crop plants by humans usually have chemical structures similar to those of the natural pesticides produced by the plants.


Answer E clearly is the only option that does not weaken the argument. In fact, it may even strengthen it.

Sorry Franklin, can't give a better explanation; as with most CR questions on this thread, I found the answers pretty straightforward.

Cheers,
_________________

Please kudos if my post helps.

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 186
Location: Ithaca, New York
Schools: Cornell University - The Johnson School
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2009, 02:58
powerka wrote:
Franklin wrote:
Quote:
Most plants have developed chemical defenses against parasites. The average plant contains about 40 natural pesticides - chemical compounds toxic to bacteria, fungi, and other parasites. Humans ingest these natural pesticides without harm every day. Therefore, the additional threat posed by synthetic pesticides sprayed on crop plants by humans is minimal.

Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument EXCEPT:

A) Humans have been consuming natural plant pesticides from millennia and have had time to adapt to them.

B) The concentrations of natural pesticides in plants are typically much lower than the concentrations of synthetic pesticides in sprayed crop plants.

C) Natural plant pesticides are typically less potent than synthetic pesticides, whose toxicity is highly concentrated.

D) Natural plant pesticides generally serve only as defenses against specific parasites, whereas synthetic pesticides are often harmful to a wide variety of organisms.

E) The synthetic pesticides sprayed on crop plants by humans usually have chemical structures similar to those of the natural pesticides produced by the plants.


Answer E clearly is the only option that does not weaken the argument. In fact, it may even strengthen it.

Sorry Franklin, can't give a better explanation; as with most CR questions on this thread, I found the answers pretty straightforward.

Cheers,


No sweat!
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 186
Location: Ithaca, New York
Schools: Cornell University - The Johnson School
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2009, 03:10
The Law School Admission Council created this question back in 2003-4 ... I thought the question to be quite prophetic!

Quote:
The economy is doing badly. First, the real estate slump has been with us for some time. Second, car sales are at their lowest in years. Of course, had either one or the other phenomenon failed to occur, this would be consistent with the economy as a whole being healthy. But, their occurrence together makes it quite probable that my conclusion is correct.

Which one of the following inferences is most strongly supported by the information above?

A) If car sales are at their lowest in years, then it is likely that the economy is doing badly.

B) If the economy is doing badly, then either the real estate market or the car sales market is not healthy.

C) If the real estate market is healthy, then it is likely that the economy as a whole is healthy.

D) If the economy is in a healthy state, then it is unlikely that the real estate and car sales markets are both in a slump.

E) The bad condition of the economy implies that both the real estate and the car sales markets are doing badly.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 9
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2009, 03:38
A) If car sales are at their lowest in years, then it is likely that the economy is doing badly.

B) If the economy is doing badly, then either the real estate market or the car sales market is not healthy.

C) If the real estate market is healthy, then it is likely that the economy as a whole is healthy.

D) If the economy is in a healthy state, then it is unlikely that the real estate and car sales markets are both in a slump.

E) The bad condition of the economy implies that both the real estate and the car sales markets are doing badly.

i think the answer is D. Because it is saying that if either of the phenomenon ( real estate slump or car sales being lowest) failed to occur then the economy would have been in a healthy state. from this we can infer that if the economy is in a healthy state then it is unlikely that both the phenomenon occured.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 122
Location: France
GPA: 3.95
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2009, 03:41
2 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 186
Location: Ithaca, New York
Schools: Cornell University - The Johnson School
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2009, 04:07
2
This post received
KUDOS
One more for today ...

Quote:
It is highly likely that Claudette is a classical pianist. Like most classical pianists, Claudette recognizes many of Clara Schumann's works. The vast majority of people who are not classical pianists do not. In fact, many people who are not classical pianists have not even heard of Clara Schumann.

The reasoning in the argument above is flawed in that it

A) ignores the possibility that Claudette is more familiar with the works of other composers of music for piano.

B) presumes, without providing justification, that people who have not heard of Clara Schumann do not recognize her works.

C) presumes, without providing justification, that classical pianists cannot also play other musical instruments.

D) relies for its plausibility on the vagueness of the term "classical."

E) ignores the possibility that the majority of people who recognize many of Clara Schumann's works are not classical pianists.
Re: Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread   [#permalink] 29 Sep 2009, 04:07

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9    Next  [ 166 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Franklin's Super-Fly Critical Reasoning Question Thread

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.