Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:07

It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:07

Toolkit

Practice Tests

Verbal Archive [Locked]

CR Archive

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Nov 19
GMAT 705 in 30 days: Best Study Strategy for Working Professionals
12:30 PM EST
-
01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 20
UCR MBA Impact - Live Q&A with UCR AdCom & Student
07:30 AM PST
-
08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 20
GMAT 675 with 96th percentile in DI- Kamakshi’s Winning Strategy
01:30 PM EST
-
02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 22
GMAT RC Masterclass
11:00 AM IST
-
01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Nov 23
Conquer Algebra on the GMAT Focus Edition
11:00 AM IST
-
01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease.
Nov 24
FREE Focus Edition Mock!
07:00 PM PST
-
08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 25
Try OnDemand GMAT Masterclass
10:00 AM EST
-
11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.

Back to Forum

Create Topic

In respectable periodicals, books are given reviewing space

hallelujah1234

Joined: 02 Mar 2004

Last visit: 29 Jan 2023

Posts: 191

Own Kudos:

Location: There

Posts: 191

Kudos: 14

19 Apr 2004, 06:17

Kudos

Bookmarks

00:00

Start Timer

Pause Timer

Resume Timer

Show Answer

Hide

Show

History

Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct

100% (03:00) wrong

based on 8 sessions

History

Date

Time

Result

Not Attempted Yet

In respectable periodicals, books are given reviewing space in inverse proportion to the likely size of their sales. Airport and supermarket bookstalls stock only books that are expected to sell in large numbers. Consequently, those who buy books at such book stalls have to do so without any guidance whatever from the book reviewers whose work published in respectable articles.

WHich of the following is a valid criticism of the argument above?

A. bookstalls like those found at airports and in supermarkets are designed to induce people to buy books on impulse.
B. The assortment of books available at airport bookstalls is different from the that of books available at supermarket bookstalls.
C.The fact the book is expected to sell well does not guarantee that actual sales will be large.
D. Many who later come to be respected as book reviewers start their careers by writing for trashy magazines
E. The conclusion that respectable periodicals never publish reviews of projected best sellers is unwarranted.

Archived Topic

Hi there,

This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.

Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum

Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.

Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!

Makky07

Joined: 23 Sep 2003

Last visit: 03 Dec 2004

Posts: 192

Own Kudos:

Location: US

Posts: 192

Kudos: 29

19 Apr 2004, 06:30

Kudos

Bookmarks

Hallelujah1234,

Did you mean to say "any guidance whatsoever"?

If so, then my answer is E.

anandnk

Joined: 30 Oct 2003

Last visit: 30 Nov 2013

Posts: 895

Own Kudos:

411

Location: NewJersey USA

Posts: 895

Kudos: 411

19 Apr 2004, 07:25

Kudos

Bookmarks

I guess C and E are the contenders.

I will have to agree with ndidi04 here. The stem is saying "likely size of their sales". choice C is a mere statement of the part of the stem.

Paul

Joined: 15 Dec 2003

Last visit: 10 Nov 2012

Posts: 2,708

Own Kudos:

1,630

Posts: 2,708

Kudos: 1,630

19 Apr 2004, 20:21

Kudos

Bookmarks

Agree with E guys although I found D pretty funny :lol:

C is a possibility that is already accounted for in the stem with "likely size of their sales"

Paul

Joined: 15 Dec 2003

Last visit: 10 Nov 2012

Posts: 2,708

Own Kudos:

1,630

Posts: 2,708

Kudos: 1,630

19 Apr 2004, 20:23

Kudos

Bookmarks

batliwala

I will go with A.

A strenghtens the argument. If people buy on impulse, then they don't get any guidance whatsoever. It explains why people don't get any guidance

--== Message from the GMAT Club Team ==--

THERE IS LIKELY A BETTER DISCUSSION OF THIS EXACT QUESTION.
This discussion does not meet community quality standards. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

rampuria

Joined: 04 Sep 2008

Last visit: 06 May 2019

Posts: 149

Own Kudos:

310

Given Kudos: 56

Location: Kolkata

Concentration: Strategic Management

Schools:La Martiniere for Boys

Posts: 149

Kudos: 310

19 Mar 2009, 06:10

Kudos

Bookmarks

In respectable periodicals, books are given reviewing space in inverse proportion to the likely size of their sales. Airport and supermarket bookstalls stock only books that are expected to sell in large numbers. Consequently, those who buy books at such book stalls have to do so without any guidance whatever from the book reviewers whose work published in respectable articles.

Which of the following is a valid criticism of the argument above?

A. bookstalls like those found at airports and in supermarkets are designed to induce people to buy books on impulse.
B. The assortment of books available at airport bookstalls is different from the that of books available at supermarket bookstalls.
C.The fact the book is expected to sell well does not guarantee that actual sales will be large.
D. Many who later come to be respected as book reviewers start their careers by writing for trashy magazines
E. The conclusion that respectable periodicals never publish reviews of projected best sellers is unwarranted.

nevergiveup

Joined: 06 Mar 2006

Last visit: 29 Dec 2010

Posts: 312

Own Kudos:

1,609

Given Kudos: 1

Posts: 312

Kudos: 1,609

20 Mar 2009, 18:28

Kudos

Bookmarks

rampuria

In respectable periodicals, books are given reviewing space in inverse proportion to the likely size of their sales. Airport and supermarket bookstalls stock only books that are expected to sell in large numbers. Consequently, those who buy books at such book stalls have to do so without any guidance whatever from the book reviewers whose work published in respectable articles.

Which of the following is a valid criticism of the argument above?

A. bookstalls like those found at airports and in supermarkets are designed to induce people to buy books on impulse. This is not criticism. This though will strengthen the argument.
B. The assortment of books available at airport bookstalls is different from the that of books available at supermarket bookstalls. No such comparison mentioned in the argument.
C.The fact the book is expected to sell well does not guarantee that actual sales will be large. This is correct. The argument mentioned expected to sell well. This does not mean it will actually sell well. Thus, buyers might still be able to see book reviews.
D. Many who later come to be respected as book reviewers start their careers by writing for trashy magazines Not mentioned in argument.
E. The conclusion that respectable periodicals never publish reviews of projected best sellers is unwarranted. Too extreme. The argument did not say respectable periodicals never publish reviews of projected best sellers.

seofah

Joined: 29 Aug 2005

Last visit: 03 Apr 2010

Posts: 486

Own Kudos:

3,120

Given Kudos: 7

Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship

Posts: 486

Kudos: 3,120

21 Mar 2009, 01:44

Kudos

Bookmarks

The argument assumes the opposite of what it says in C. This is one of the common routes to weaken an argument.

kuldeep4gmat

Joined: 23 Mar 2009

Last visit: 21 Aug 2009

Posts: 11

Own Kudos:

[1]

Posts: 11

Kudos: 1

[1]

23 Mar 2009, 10:34

Kudos

Bookmarks

IMO C

patedhav

Joined: 07 Jul 2007

Last visit: 22 Apr 2009

Posts: 58

Own Kudos:

Posts: 58

Kudos: 62

26 Mar 2009, 15:27

Kudos

Bookmarks

IMO C.

shkusira

Joined: 02 Mar 2009

Last visit: 22 May 2013

Posts: 79

Own Kudos:

120

Posts: 79

Kudos: 120

27 Mar 2009, 07:32

Kudos

Bookmarks

I would go with A.

I dont think C is true because:
- The advertising space is based on likely level of sales (ie expected)
- The stocking of books at airport and supermarkets is based on expected level of sales too.

Thus even if expected level does not guarantee actual, the buyer will not be exposed to book reviews, assuming that the two (advertisers and stalls) have the same criteria to decide on expected level of sales.

I think A is true coz it brings a new explanation. It states that the reviews whatsoever (of good books or bad books) have no role in determining the purchase at these places. Hence, the reviews are not really related to purchase at these places.

This is what I think at least.

OA?

IanStewart

GMAT Tutor

Joined: 24 Jun 2008

Last visit: 18 Nov 2025

Posts: 4,145

Own Kudos:

10,987

Given Kudos: 99

Expert

Expert reply

Posts: 4,145

Kudos: 10,987

27 Mar 2009, 08:54

Kudos

Bookmarks

rampuria

I'm curious to know the source of the question, since it doesn't strike me as a realistic GMAT question. There are two answers I find equally compelling here, though neither is one of the answers provided in the posts above.

The conclusion of the argument is an extreme one: "Those who buy books at airports and supermarkets get no guidance whatsoever from reviewers who publish in respectable periodicals." We need to find a legitimate criticism of this argument:

rampuria

A. bookstalls like those found at airports and in supermarkets are designed to induce people to buy books on impulse.

This has nothing to do with the conclusion, which is concerned with whether people read reviews of these books.

rampuria

B. The assortment of books available at airport bookstalls is different from the that of books available at supermarket bookstalls.

Again, this has nothing to do with the conclusion.

rampuria

C.The fact the book is expected to sell well does not guarantee that actual sales will be large.

The books stocked by airports are those expected to sell well. Similarly, respectable periodicals make decisions about what books to review based on expected sales. Actual sales are irrelevant to the argument.

rampuria

D. Many who later come to be respected as book reviewers start their careers by writing for trashy magazines

If I make certain assumptions, this seems like a perfectly plausible criticism of the argument. The argument claims that people buying books at airports get no guidance from reviewers who publish in respectable periodicals. It does not claim that people don't get guidance from the periodicals themselves. If the reviewers who publish in respectable periodicals also publish reviews in other places, perhaps people do get guidance from those reviewers - from the reviews they publish in trashy magazines, for example. If all of the reviewers who now publish in respectable periodicals used to publish book reviews in trashy magazines, and if trashy magazines publish reviews of airport stall books, readers may have had access to extensive book reviews of airport books by these writers - not, perhaps, of the latest publications, but there may certainly be older books on the bookstands in airport book stores. So I can justify D on those grounds, though it requires a few assumptions - in particular, I'm assuming that airport book stores still have older books on their shelves. Without information about that, D is a potentially valid criticism.

rampuria

E. The conclusion that respectable periodicals never publish reviews of projected best sellers is unwarranted.

This, however, is certainly a valid criticism. We know that "in respectable periodicals, books are given reviewing space in inverse proportion to the likely size of their sales." Well, if two things are inversely proportional, as one goes up, the other goes down. That is, the higher the expected sales of a book, the less space the respectable periodical will allocate to the book's review. Notice that does not mean that the book gets no review at all from the periodical -- it only means it gets a shorter review than a book which is not expected to sell well. E identifies a flaw in the argument - the argument misunderstands the meaning of 'inverse proportion' - and is a perfectly valid criticism.

adenshin

Joined: 01 Apr 2009

Last visit: 09 Apr 2009

Posts: 2

Kudos: 0

01 Apr 2009, 00:51

Kudos

Bookmarks

I Would go with E

Conclusion : Those who buy books at airport or supermarket bookstalls should buy books without some reivew from respectable article in periodicals. Because books which are introduced in periodicals are given space in inverse proportion to the expected sales and airport and supermarket bookstalls are stocked with books which are expected to sell in large number.

Analyze above item by item
* magazine : no review for big sales expected books
* bookstalls : stock only big sales expected books
* customer in bookstalls : they should be meet some books in there for the fisrt time because they might not being informed from magazine.

So If magazine once published review of big sales expected books, then there should be possibility that customer might have been noted about bestseller book at bookstall. Regarding to this, conclusion should be wrong.

I once confused with A too, but A is not about the likelihood whether people is noted or not about books.

What is OA?

lgon

Joined: 14 Nov 2008

Last visit: 25 Jun 2012

Posts: 108

Own Kudos:

657

Given Kudos: 3

Concentration: Entrepreneurship

Schools:Stanford...Wait, I will come!!!

Posts: 108

Kudos: 657

01 Apr 2009, 00:57

Kudos

Bookmarks

rampuria

In respectable periodicals, books are given reviewing space in inverse proportion to the likely size of their sales. Airport and supermarket bookstalls stock only books that are expected to sell in large numbers. Consequently, those who buy books at such book stalls have to do so without any guidance whatever from the book reviewers whose work published in respectable articles.

Which of the following is a valid criticism of the argument above?

The criticism can be:
1) they publish the criticism
2) All the books are available and the sales is not affected much
3)Guidance is available

A. bookstalls like those found at airports and in supermarkets are designed to induce people to buy books on impulse. its not a criticism
B. The assortment of books available at airport bookstalls is different from the that of books available at supermarket bookstalls. Also its not a criticism
C.The fact the book is expected to sell well does not guarantee that actual sales will be large.Keep it on hold
D. Many who later come to be respected as book reviewers start their careers by writing for trashy magazines Not related
E. The conclusion that respectable periodicals never publish reviews of projected best sellers is unwarranted.

keep it on hold
So out of C & E, E is better.

ngoctraiden1905

Joined: 11 Aug 2008

Last visit: 18 Nov 2009

Posts: 78

Own Kudos:

102

Given Kudos: 8

Posts: 78

Kudos: 102

28 Oct 2009, 07:53

Kudos

Bookmarks

I think E

VerbalBot

Non-Human User

Joined: 01 Oct 2013

Last visit: 04 Jan 2021

Posts: 18,833

Own Kudos:

986

Posts: 18,833

Kudos: 986

01 Feb 2023, 07:32

Kudos

Bookmarks

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Archived Topic

Hi there,

This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.

Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum

Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.

Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!