GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 14 Dec 2018, 20:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Typical Day of a UCLA MBA Student - Recording of Webinar with UCLA Adcom and Student

December 14, 2018

December 14, 2018

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Carolyn and Brett - nicely explained what is the typical day of a UCLA student. I am posting below recording of the webinar for those who could't attend this session.
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

December 15, 2018

December 15, 2018

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

# In the years 1971 to 1980, the population of the state prison system

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 357
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
In the years 1971 to 1980, the population of the state prison system  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 17 May 2017, 10:18
6
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (01:44) correct 28% (02:08) wrong based on 279 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the years 1971 to 1980, the population of the state prison system was on average about 82 percent of maximum occupancy. During those years, the average number of prisoners entering the system each year was equivalent to 9.1 percent of maximum occupancy. From the years 1981 to 1984, the average number of prisoners entering the system each year fell to 7.3 percent of maximum occupancy, yet the population of the state prison system rose to almost 89 percent of maximum occupancy.

Which of the following, if true, helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy?

(A) The average sentence of a prisoner in the state system increased from 1981 to 1984.

(B) Beginning in 1981, many of those entering the state prison system had been transferred from prisons in other states.

(C) Between 1981 and 1984, the percentage of prisoners incarcerated for violent crimes increased by 26 percent.

(D) In 1981, a legislative fact-finding committee proposed a revision of the state's parole and work release programs.

(E) Between 1971 and 1984, the proportion of active criminals actually caught and incarcerated in the state prison system has steadily increased.

Originally posted by abrakadabra21 on 02 Jul 2015, 00:37.
Last edited by Bunuel on 17 May 2017, 10:18, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic, edited the question and added the OA.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7106
Re: In the years 1971 to 1980, the population of the state prison system  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2015, 08:21
In the years 1971 to 1980, the population of the state prison system was on average about 82 percent of maximum occupancy. During those years, the average number of prisoners entering the system each year was equivalent to 9.1 percent of maximum occupancy. From the years 1981 to 1984, the average number of prisoners entering the system each year fell to 7.3 percent of maximum occupancy, yet the population of the state prison system rose to almost 89 percent of maximum occupancy.

Which of the following, if true, helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy?

(A) The average sentence of a prisoner in the state system increased from 1981 to 1984.
correct. this shows that although less were entering but the peoplr released was even less...

(B) Beginning in 1981, many of those entering the state prison system had been transferred from prisons in other states.
they would still be part of 7.3% .. out of context

(C) Between 1981 and 1984, the percentage of prisoners incarcerated for violent crimes increased by 26 percent.
types of crimes! out of context

(D) In 1981, a legislative fact-finding committee proposed a revision of the state's parole and work release programs.
out of context

(E) Between 1971 and 1984, the proportion of active criminals actually caught and incarcerated in the state prison system has steadily increased.
again not related to argument

ans A
_________________

1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effects-of-arithmetic-operations-on-fractions-269413.html

GMAT online Tutor

Director
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 568
Schools: Cambridge'16
Re: In the years 1971 to 1980, the population of the state prison system  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2015, 20:16
С for me

If the entering decreased the only way to increase the occupancy is to release less prisoner than before. It is possible when punishment stricter, for example for violent crimes
Manager
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Posts: 50
Re: In the years 1971 to 1980, the population of the state prison system  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2018, 02:33
Can someone explain why choice E is wrong? My mind clogs when it comes to working with averages, percentages & proportions.
Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3620
Re: In the years 1971 to 1980, the population of the state prison system  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2018, 02:58
Can someone explain why choice E is wrong? My mind clogs when it comes to working with averages, percentages & proportions.

I think you didn't understand the argument properly.

It says despite less number of prisoners entering the system, the overall occupancy increased between 1981-1984. We need to find out the reason of this strange thing.

E is talking about an increase in the number of prisoners caught from 1971 to 1984. But we already know that there was a decrease of that value every year between 1981 and 1984.

Hence, E is actually breaking a premise, hence it is wrong.

Does that make sense?
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.

Intern
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 10
Location: Russian Federation
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3
Re: In the years 1971 to 1980, the population of the state prison system  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Mar 2018, 11:28
I haven't found an appropriate answer, since A) does not resolve the discrepancy.
I expected that the answer will be that the average sentence of a prisoner increased from 1971 to 1980 in comparison with previous periods. Im my opinion, long prison terms of newcomers couldn't affect significantly in a few years if the majority of prisoners, who came in 1971 - 1980, had short team and started to get out.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 51215
Re: In the years 1971 to 1980, the population of the state prison system  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2018, 01:00
In the years 1971 to 1980, the population of the state prison system was on average about 82 percent of maximum occupancy. During those years, the average number of prisoners entering the system each year was equivalent to 9.1 percent of maximum occupancy. From the years 1981 to 1984, the average number of prisoners entering the system each year fell to 7.3 percent of maximum occupancy, yet the population of the state prison system rose to almost 89 percent of maximum occupancy.

Which of the following, if true, helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy?

(A) The average sentence of a prisoner in the state system increased from 1981 to 1984.

(B) Beginning in 1981, many of those entering the state prison system had been transferred from prisons in other states.

(C) Between 1981 and 1984, the percentage of prisoners incarcerated for violent crimes increased by 26 percent.

(D) In 1981, a legislative fact-finding committee proposed a revision of the state's parole and work release programs.

(E) Between 1971 and 1984, the proportion of active criminals actually caught and incarcerated in the state prison system has steadily increased.

KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:

Here we have a case in which an apparent paradox stems from a misunderstanding of statistics. Clear up the misunderstanding, and the paradox vanishes—that is, the rise described at the end no longer seems surprising.

An 800 test taker knows that numbers and statistics can be fertile ground for all sorts of questions. She knows these questions may ask her to find the choice that points out a flaw or weakness in an argument, or, as in this case, that resolves an apparent discrepancy. Either way, she recognizes that understanding the ways in which numbers and percentages are used—or misused—is the key to answering any question concocted out of a numerical or statistical situation.

Here are the facts: In the early years, the prisons were 82% full, and just over 9% of the total possible occupancy arrived each year in the form of new prisoners. Now that the latter figure is down to 7.3%, the author is surprised that the prisons are more full: 89% full. She evidently expects that as one figure drops, so should the other. The key is seeing that she is focusing on the trend in incoming prisoners only, when the totals take into account all prisoners. Consider the long-termers. If the average length of sentences of all prisoners is increasing, then it's small wonder that the prisons are more crowded now, even if a smaller percentage of the inmates are newcomers. That's what (A), the correct answer, is all about.

(B) Where the prisoners came from has no impact on how many are, or should be, here in this state.

(C) Nothing in the evidence concerns the nature of crime, so no information about what landed these people in jail in the first place can resolve the paradox.

(D) A "proposed revision" is way too weak. Was it instituted? And even if it was, what effect would it have? There's no way to know, so (D) is irrelevant and does nothing to clear up what the author considers to be a surprising result.

(E), even if true, begs the question of why the percentage of the prison total entering the system is lower than years ago, but the prisons are fuller. All (E) says is that fewer criminals are getting off scot free.
_________________
Re: In the years 1971 to 1980, the population of the state prison system &nbs [#permalink] 02 Aug 2018, 01:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by