GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 12 Nov 2018, 14:34

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in November
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Essential GMAT Time-Management Hacks

     November 14, 2018

     November 14, 2018

     08:00 PM MST

     09:00 PM MST

    Join the webinar and learn time-management tactics that will guarantee you answer all questions, in all sections, on time. Save your spot today! Nov. 14th at 7 PM PST
  • $450 Tuition Credit & Official CAT Packs FREE

     November 15, 2018

     November 15, 2018

     10:00 PM MST

     11:00 PM MST

    EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299)

Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Dec 2011
Posts: 9
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V28
Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jan 2012, 17:54
5
7
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

76% (01:09) correct 24% (01:20) wrong based on 662 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Is r > s ?

(1) -r + s < 0
(2) r < | s |

Well, 1st one is clear but I have some difficulties with second statement. I guessed it's not sufficient but need clarification. Thank you!

_________________

Wanna crack GMAT!

Most Helpful Expert Reply
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50544
Re: Is r > s ?  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jan 2012, 18:02
5
6
DesecratoR wrote:
Is r > s ?

(1) -r + s < 0
(2) r < | s |

Well, 1st one is clear but I have some difficulties with second statement. I guessed it's not sufficient but need clarification. Thank you!


Welcome to GMAT Club. Below is a solution for this problem.

Is \(r>s\)?

(1) \(-r+s<0\) --> rearrange (or add \(r\) to both parts): \(s<r\), directly answers the question. Sufficient.

(2) \(r<|s|\) --> either \(r<s\) or \(r<-s\) (for example \(r=1\) and \(s=2\) OR \(r=1\) and \(s=-2\)). Not sufficient.

Basically this statement tells that absolute value of s is more than r, but s itself may be more, as well as less than r.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

General Discussion
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Dec 2011
Posts: 9
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V28
Re: Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jan 2012, 18:07
Clear, thanks! See you around!
_________________

Wanna crack GMAT!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 140
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Operations (Insurance)
Re: Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Feb 2012, 21:38
Thanks but I am struggling with statement II

The statement tells us that
a) r<-s or :
s -s r r<-s? r>s?
5 -5 6 No
-5 5 -6 Yes No

b) r<s : r cannot be greater than S

both the substatements say thar r is not greater than s therefor should be sufficient
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50544
Re: Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Feb 2012, 22:41
devinawilliam83 wrote:
Thanks but I am struggling with statement II

The statement tells us that
a) r<-s or :
s -s r r<-s? r>s?
5 -5 6 No
-5 5 -6 Yes No

b) r<s : r cannot be greater than S

both the substatements say thar r is not greater than s therefor should be sufficient


(2) \(r<|s|\) --> either \(r<s\) OR \(r<-s\). Now, try some number to see that this statement is not sufficient: if \(r=1\) and \(s=2\) then \(r<s\) BUT if \(r=1\) and \(s=-2\) then \(r>s\).

Again: this statement tells that absolute value of \(s\) is more than \(r\), but \(s\) itself may be more, as well as less than \(r\).

Hope it's clear.
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 158
Location: Germany
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: IE '15 (M)
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Re: Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Feb 2012, 03:11
A

(I) rearrange to s<r --> sufficient
(II) r < | s | --> r can be smaller s (5<6) or greater s (5>-6), absolute value hide the positive or negative sign --> not sufficient
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 149
Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2012, 20:44
Lolaergasheva wrote:
Is r > s ?

(1) -r + s < 0
(2) r < | s |

Is r>s?

(1) -r+s<0
so s<r
so for question answer will be "yes"
So (1) is sufficient

(2) r<|s|
If s is positive sufficient
If s is negative not sufficient.
So (2) is also not sufficient

A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 431
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2012, 01:40
Is r > s ?

(1) -r + s < 0
Manipulate -r + s > 0 ==> s > r ==> NO! ==> SUFFICIENT!

(2) r < | s |
Let r = 5, s = -6 ==> r > s ? YES!
Let r = 5, s = 6 ==> r > s ? NO!
INSUFFICIENT!

Answer: A
_________________

Impossible is nothing to God.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 May 2011
Posts: 31
Re: Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2012, 19:36
Another way to look at the second statement is this. this will save u a lot of time. won't even have to plug in for this.

Remember that |x| >y (or any such relation, no matter >,< or =) can be written as
-y>x>y.
(that is, just remember to keep the relation the same and just put negative on the left hand side and positive on the right hand side.)

so... statement 2 says r<|S|
meaning |s|>r ==> -r>s>r

so on the left hand side, S lies further left of -r, such that if r is 2 and thus -r is -2, s is even less and so s is -3 thus s is less than r, and so the main queston r>s is answered yes. but on the right hand side, s>r so the main question is answered no. hence stmt 2 is not sufficient.


DesecratoR wrote:
Is r > s ?

(1) -r + s < 0
(2) r < | s |

Well, 1st one is clear but I have some difficulties with second statement. I guessed it's not sufficient but need clarification. Thank you!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Posts: 360
Re: Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2017, 10:12
Is r > s ?

(1) -r + s < 0 = I re arranged the statement, so r < s so sufficient
(2) r < | s | = here there were two cases given the modulus, so insufficient: case 1) r < s 2) -r > s

But I combined 1) + 2) where the common answer was r < s. But A is OA.
Could anyone explain the flaw in my reasoning?
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 04 Apr 2017
Posts: 21
Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2017, 10:24
3
Madhavi1990 wrote:
Is r > s ?

(1) -r + s < 0 = I re arranged the statement, so r < s so sufficient
(2) r < | s | = here there were two cases given the modulus, so insufficient: case 1) r < s 2) -r > s

But I combined 1) + 2) where the common answer was r < s. But A is OA.
Could anyone explain the flaw in my reasoning?



1) -r + s < 0
-r < -s
Multiple both side by -1, when u do this reverse the inequality
r>s
So, it is sufficient. Once u have statement 1 as sufficient, you can eliminate option B,C,E. Only option A and D are left now.
As statement 2 is not sufficient in itself , we eliminate option D and only possible answer is A.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 374
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2017, 10:28
1
Madhavi1990 wrote:
Is r > s ?

(1) -r + s < 0 = I re arranged the statement, so r < s so sufficient
(2) r < | s | = here there were two cases given the modulus, so insufficient: case 1) r < s 2) -r > s

But I combined 1) + 2) where the common answer was r < s. But A is OA.
Could anyone explain the flaw in my reasoning?


According to statement 1 -> -r + s < 0 => -r < -s
Multiply both by -1 <— we need to flip the sign
R > S
Sufficient.

Statement 2 has 2 scenarios, when s <0 and when s>0 hence its insufficient.

A. Hope this helps.

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

Put in the work, and that dream score is yours!

Senior PS Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 3301
Location: India
GPA: 3.12
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2017, 10:30
2
Madhavi1990 wrote:
Is r > s ?

(1) -r + s < 0 = I re arranged the statement, so r < s so sufficient
(2) r < | s | = here there were two cases given the modulus, so insufficient: case 1) r < s 2) -r > s

But I combined 1) + 2) where the common answer was r < s. But A is OA.
Could anyone explain the flaw in my reasoning?


Statement 1 which reads -r + s < 0
Is nothing but -r < -s(when you subtract s from both sides)
When we multiply -1 on both sides, the greater than becomes lesser than (or) lesser than becomes greater than
Therefore, the inequality becomes r>s which alone is sufficient.

These are the options in a GMAT DS question
(A) Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
(B) Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
(C) BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
(D) EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
(E) Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

C comes into play only when either 1 or 2 is not enough to prove the statement.

Hope that helps!
_________________

You've got what it takes, but it will take everything you've got

VP
VP
User avatar
V
Status: It's near - I can see.
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Posts: 1282
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GMAT 1: 480 Q38 V22
GPA: 3.01
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2018, 22:31
DesecratoR wrote:
Is r > s ?

(1) -r + s < 0
(2) r < | s |

Well, 1st one is clear but I have some difficulties with second statement. I guessed it's not sufficient but need clarification. Thank you!



Question : Is r > s ?

or r - s > 0 ?

or -r + s < 0 ?


St 1: -r + s < 0 Sufficient

r < | s |

means r < s or r <−s Insufficient

(A)
_________________

"Do not watch clock; Do what it does. KEEP GOING."

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s | &nbs [#permalink] 10 Mar 2018, 22:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Is r > s ? (1) -r + s < 0 (2) r < | s |

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.