Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

List S and List T each contain 5 positive integers, and for [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Aug 2006, 13:05

4

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

77% (02:14) correct
23% (00:51) wrong based on 343 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

List S and List T each contain 5 positive integers, and for each list the average (arithmetic mean) of the integers in the list is 40. If the integers 30,40,50 are in both lists, is the standard deviation of the integers in list S greater than the standard deviation of the integers in list T?

(1) The integer 25 is in list S (2) The integer 45 is in list T

1) Calculate all members of S, but not of T. Insuff.
2) Calculate all members of T, but not of S. Insuff.

Combine. We have both sets and can get a result.
_________________

Uh uh. I know what you're thinking. "Is the answer A, B, C, D or E?" Well to tell you the truth in all this excitement I kinda lost track myself. But you've gotta ask yourself one question: "Do I feel lucky?" Well, do ya, punk?

The S.D of Set S will be greater than S.D of set T?

No doubt the answer is C

List S and List T each contain 5 positive integers, and for each list the average (arithmetic mean) of the integers in the list is 40. If the integers 30,40,50 are in both lists, is the standard deviation of the integers in list S greater than the standard deviation of the integers in list T?

The mean of 5 integers is 40 means that the sum of these 5 integers is 5*40=200. The sum of the 3 out of these 5 integers is 30+40+50=120, thus the sum of the remaining 2 integers in each lists is 200-120=80.

(1) The integer 25 is in list S. The 5th integer in S is 80-25=55. We know list S. Not sufficient. (2) The integer 45 is in list T. The 5th integer in T is 80-45=35. We know list T. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We know all terms of each set, thus we can get the standard deviation of each and compare. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

As for your question:

S = {25, 30, 40, 50, 55} T = {30, 35, 40, 45, 50}

The standard deviation of a set shows how much variation there is from the mean, how widespread a given set is. So, a low standard deviation indicates that the data points tend to be very close to the mean, whereas high standard deviation indicates that the data are spread out over a large range of values.

List T is less widespread thus will have lower standard deviation than that of list S.

Re: List S and List T each contain 5 positive integers, and for [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jan 2015, 10:46

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: List S and List T each contain 5 positive integers, and for [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Jan 2016, 00:10

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

List S and List T each contain 5 positive integers, and for [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jul 2016, 02:37

alimad wrote:

List S and List T each contain 5 positive integers, and for each list the average (arithmetic mean) of the integers in the list is 40. If the integers 30,40,50 are in both lists, is the standard deviation of the integers in list S greater than the standard deviation of the integers in list T?

(1) The integer 25 is in list S (2) The integer 45 is in list T

Using stimulus we know S={30,40,50,-,-,} two unknown ; Mean is 40 T={30,40,50,-,-} two unknown ; Mean is 40

Lets use the quick "EYEBALL SD FROM MEAN" method . Now the set which will have values far from 40 will have a greater SD

Stament(1) The integer 25 is in list S It means our set is now complete S={25,30,40,50,55} But it tells us nothing about element of other set. INSUFFICIENT

(2) The integer 45 is in list T Meaning now out set T is complete t={30,35,40,45,50} But it tells that nothing about element of set S INSUFFICIENT

MERGING BOTH S={25,30,40,50,55} T={30,35,40,45,50}

Lets use the quick "EYEBALL SD FROM MEAN" method . SD of S will be greater since it extreme values are more spread out from the mean (40-25 =15 and 40-55=-15) Exact SD will be 12.7 SD of T will be lower since it extreme values are less spread out from the mean (40-30 =10 and 40-50=-10) Exact SD will be 7.9

ANSWER IS C
_________________

Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly. FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.

Re: List S and List T each contain 5 positive integers, and for [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Feb 2017, 10:08

Bunuel wrote:

fozzzy wrote:

Just curious when the statements are combined

The S.D of Set S will be greater than S.D of set T?

No doubt the answer is C

List S and List T each contain 5 positive integers, and for each list the average (arithmetic mean) of the integers in the list is 40. If the integers 30,40,50 are in both lists, is the standard deviation of the integers in list S greater than the standard deviation of the integers in list T?

The mean of 5 integers is 40 means that the sum of these 5 integers is 5*40=200. The sum of the 3 out of these 5 integers is 30+40+50=120, thus the sum of the remaining 2 integers in each lists is 200-120=80.

(1) The integer 25 is in list S. The 5th integer in S is 80-25=55. We know list S. Not sufficient. (2) The integer 45 is in list T. The 5th integer in T is 80-45=35. We know list T. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We know all terms of each set, thus we can get the standard deviation of each and compare. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

As for your question:

S = {25, 30, 40, 50, 55} T = {30, 35, 40, 45, 50}

The standard deviation of a set shows how much variation there is from the mean, how widespread a given set is. So, a low standard deviation indicates that the data points tend to be very close to the mean, whereas high standard deviation indicates that the data are spread out over a large range of values.

List T is less widespread thus will have lower standard deviation than that of list S.

Hope it's clear.

Calculating SD with formula Range/4, Is this correct?
_________________

The S.D of Set S will be greater than S.D of set T?

No doubt the answer is C

List S and List T each contain 5 positive integers, and for each list the average (arithmetic mean) of the integers in the list is 40. If the integers 30,40,50 are in both lists, is the standard deviation of the integers in list S greater than the standard deviation of the integers in list T?

The mean of 5 integers is 40 means that the sum of these 5 integers is 5*40=200. The sum of the 3 out of these 5 integers is 30+40+50=120, thus the sum of the remaining 2 integers in each lists is 200-120=80.

(1) The integer 25 is in list S. The 5th integer in S is 80-25=55. We know list S. Not sufficient. (2) The integer 45 is in list T. The 5th integer in T is 80-45=35. We know list T. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We know all terms of each set, thus we can get the standard deviation of each and compare. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

As for your question:

S = {25, 30, 40, 50, 55} T = {30, 35, 40, 45, 50}

The standard deviation of a set shows how much variation there is from the mean, how widespread a given set is. So, a low standard deviation indicates that the data points tend to be very close to the mean, whereas high standard deviation indicates that the data are spread out over a large range of values.

List T is less widespread thus will have lower standard deviation than that of list S.

Hope it's clear.

Calculating SD with formula Range/4, Is this correct?

No. Where is the SD calculated as range/4?
_________________

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...