Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 06:02 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 06:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,230
Own Kudos:
5,890
 [22]
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,230
Kudos: 5,890
 [22]
Kudos
Add Kudos
22
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
NCRanjan
Joined: 10 Sep 2018
Last visit: 05 Mar 2019
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
57
 [1]
Given Kudos: 72
Posts: 41
Kudos: 57
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
sandeep211986
Joined: 04 Nov 2015
Last visit: 02 Jul 2023
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 29
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
rahul6019
Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Last visit: 21 Jan 2019
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
71
 [1]
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 66
Kudos: 71
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A for me too. In B, usage of would is incorrect.
avatar
ArupRS
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Last visit: 02 Jul 2025
Posts: 254
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 358
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V36 (Online)
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V36 (Online)
Posts: 254
Kudos: 248
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sandeep211986
A for me ,in B would is not used with reference to the past.

Posted from my mobile device

Can you please elaborate more?

Regards.
Arup
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,230
Own Kudos:
5,890
 [4]
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,230
Kudos: 5,890
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question Explanation


This sentence is correct as written.

The underlined portion of the sentence contains the idiom, so as…to, so check to see if that idiom is correct. There appears to be no error in the original sentence, so keep choice A. Because there is no error in the original sentence, there are no obvious repeaters to look for, so evaluate the remaining answer choices individually looking for reasons to eliminate each.

Choice B contains a pronoun, them, which might refer to corporations, operations, or businesses, so this is a pronoun ambiguity error. Eliminate choice B. Choice C contains two pronouns, they and them, which again might refer to corporations, operations, or businesses, so this is another pronoun ambiguity error. Eliminate choice C. Choice D restructures the sentence to create an additional list. Are scaling and to be hindered are not parallel, so eliminate choice D. Choice E contains the pronoun them, which might refer to corporations, operations, or businesses, so this is a pronoun ambiguity error. Eliminate choice E.

Alternatively, if it is difficult to spot the grammar rule the sentence is testing, another strategy is to identify an error from the answers by looking for either a 2/3 split or differences among the answers. Because three of the answer choices use the preposition so and two of them use the conjunction and, this difference is an indication to look for parallel construction errors.

Choice A: Correct.

Choice B: No. The pronoun them is ambiguous. Pronoun ambiguity.

Choice C: No. The pronouns they and them are ambiguous. Pronoun ambiguity.

Choice D: No. The verb forms are scaling and to be hindered are not parallel. Parallel construction.

Choice E: No. The pronoun them is ambiguous. Pronoun ambiguity.

The correct answer is choice A.
User avatar
NinetyFour
Joined: 22 Sep 2018
Last visit: 22 Dec 2019
Posts: 188
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 78
Posts: 188
Kudos: 210
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aragonn
Many corporations are scaling back their operations and focusing on their core businesses so as not to be hindered by over-diversification in the world marketplace.

A. so as not to be hindered by over-diversification

B. so that over-diversification would not hinder them

C. so that they will not have so much diversification to hinder them

D. and thereby not to be hindered by over-diversification

E. and there is not so much diversification to hinder them

Reasoning:
B, C, E) Vague pronoun. Them could refer to companies or businesses
D) And conjunction doesn't make sense. Since "Many corporations are scaling back their operations and focusing on their core businesses" results in the companies not being hindered. I think if D) removed the and the sentence would be fine since thereby means as a result
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aragonn

Question Explanation


This sentence is correct as written.

The underlined portion of the sentence contains the idiom, so as…to, so check to see if that idiom is correct. There appears to be no error in the original sentence, so keep choice A. Because there is no error in the original sentence, there are no obvious repeaters to look for, so evaluate the remaining answer choices individually looking for reasons to eliminate each.

Choice B contains a pronoun, them, which might refer to corporations, operations, or businesses, so this is a pronoun ambiguity error. Eliminate choice B. Choice C contains two pronouns, they and them, which again might refer to corporations, operations, or businesses, so this is another pronoun ambiguity error. Eliminate choice C. Choice D restructures the sentence to create an additional list. Are scaling and to be hindered are not parallel, so eliminate choice D. Choice E contains the pronoun them, which might refer to corporations, operations, or businesses, so this is a pronoun ambiguity error. Eliminate choice E.

Alternatively, if it is difficult to spot the grammar rule the sentence is testing, another strategy is to identify an error from the answers by looking for either a 2/3 split or differences among the answers. Because three of the answer choices use the preposition so and two of them use the conjunction and, this difference is an indication to look for parallel construction errors.

Choice A: Correct.

Choice B: No. The pronoun them is ambiguous. Pronoun ambiguity.

Choice C: No. The pronouns they and them are ambiguous. Pronoun ambiguity.

Choice D: No. The verb forms are scaling and to be hindered are not parallel. Parallel construction.

Choice E: No. The pronoun them is ambiguous. Pronoun ambiguity.

The correct answer is choice A.

Is it right to eliminate an answer just based on pronoun ambiguity ?
User avatar
Vinodhini1803
Joined: 07 Apr 2018
Last visit: 16 Apr 2024
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 250
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
Products:
Posts: 127
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Priyanka1293
aragonn

Question Explanation


This sentence is correct as written.

The underlined portion of the sentence contains the idiom, so as…to, so check to see if that idiom is correct. There appears to be no error in the original sentence, so keep choice A. Because there is no error in the original sentence, there are no obvious repeaters to look for, so evaluate the remaining answer choices individually looking for reasons to eliminate each.

Choice B contains a pronoun, them, which might refer to corporations, operations, or businesses, so this is a pronoun ambiguity error. Eliminate choice B. Choice C contains two pronouns, they and them, which again might refer to corporations, operations, or businesses, so this is another pronoun ambiguity error. Eliminate choice C. Choice D restructures the sentence to create an additional list. Are scaling and to be hindered are not parallel, so eliminate choice D. Choice E contains the pronoun them, which might refer to corporations, operations, or businesses, so this is a pronoun ambiguity error. Eliminate choice E.

Alternatively, if it is difficult to spot the grammar rule the sentence is testing, another strategy is to identify an error from the answers by looking for either a 2/3 split or differences among the answers. Because three of the answer choices use the preposition so and two of them use the conjunction and, this difference is an indication to look for parallel construction errors.

Choice A: Correct.

Choice B: No. The pronoun them is ambiguous. Pronoun ambiguity.

Choice C: No. The pronouns they and them are ambiguous. Pronoun ambiguity.

Choice D: No. The verb forms are scaling and to be hindered are not parallel. Parallel construction.

Choice E: No. The pronoun them is ambiguous. Pronoun ambiguity.

The correct answer is choice A.

Is it right to eliminate an answer just based on pronoun ambiguity ?


I had the same doubt. I felt B was a right answer. Also So as to is a wrong idiom
So 'Adjective' to + Verb is the right one - something I read in another post.
Not sure which is right
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,564
 [3]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,564
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Priyanka1293
Vinodhini1803

We don't want to cut a choice simply because it uses a pronoun that could in theory refer to more than one noun in the sentence. However, if it's legitimately unclear what the pronoun is referring to, then we can feel justified cutting the choice, and I'd argue that that's the case here.

There is also another problem with B--"would." We use "would" for hypotheticals ("If you did X, she would do Y") or as the past tense of will ("'I thought she would not do that."). A desired result does not count as a hypothetical, so "would" doesn't work here.
User avatar
Vinodhini1803
Joined: 07 Apr 2018
Last visit: 16 Apr 2024
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 250
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
Products:
Posts: 127
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
Priyanka1293
Vinodhini1803

We don't want to cut a choice simply because it uses a pronoun that could in theory refer to more than one noun in the sentence. However, if it's legitimately unclear what the pronoun is referring to, then we can feel justified cutting the choice, and I'd argue that that's the case here.

There is also another problem with B--"would." We use "would" for hypotheticals ("If you did X, she would do Y") or as the past tense of will ("'I thought she would not do that."). A desired result does not count as a hypothetical, so "would" doesn't work here.

Thank you for a quick reply.
if the sentence is "Many corporations scaled back their operation..." then is usage of would right?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,564
 [3]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,564
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vinodhini1803
We could use "would" in such a situation, but only if we had a clause that would be written as "will" in the present tense.

Watch this switch from present to past:

If you damage the truck, your parents will be mad.
I knew that if you damaged the truck, your parents would be mad.

Here, will/would is not quite right, since we're not saying for sure that the corporations will not be hindered. We're simply explaining the motivation or goal for the companies' actions, so the construction "so as not to" works very well.
User avatar
Vinodhini1803
Joined: 07 Apr 2018
Last visit: 16 Apr 2024
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 250
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
Products:
Posts: 127
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
Vinodhini1803
We could use "would" in such a situation, but only if we had a clause that would be written as "will" in the present tense.

Watch this switch from present to past:

If you damage the truck, your parents will be mad.
I knew that if you damaged the truck, your parents would be mad.

Here, will/would is not quite right, since we're not saying for sure that the corporations will not be hindered. We're simply explaining the motivation or goal for the companies' actions, so the construction "so as not to" works very well.

Got it. thanks :)
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,833
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,833
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts