GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 24 Sep 2018, 11:02

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 195
Location: India
Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 14 Mar 2018, 07:53
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

80% (01:55) correct 20% (02:18) wrong based on 181 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence voters’ views by means of television advertisements.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the critics’ argument?

(A) Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.

(B) During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.

(C) Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations.

(D) Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.

(E) Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that opinion.

_________________

Cheers,
SD

Originally posted by SudiptoGmat on 26 Jan 2010, 20:24.
Last edited by broall on 14 Mar 2018, 07:53, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 160
Re: Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2010, 06:35
belonging to all ideologies.Under such a case,opinion wouldnt be biased.
Only C clarifies that such a situaion doesnt exist
Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 195
Location: India
Re: Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2010, 11:49
1
SudiptoGmat wrote:
Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the effect that certain policies should be determined not by the legislature itself but by public referenda in which every voter can take part. Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased, since wealthy special-interest groups are able to influence voters’ views by means of television advertisements.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the critics’ argument?

CN: Critics of the proposals argue that the outcomes of public referenda would be biased
(A) Many state legislators regard public referenda as a way of avoiding voting on issues on which their constituents are divided.
(B) During elections for members of the legislature, the number of people who vote is unaffected by whether the candidates run television advertisements or not.
(C) Proponents of policies that are opposed by wealthy special-interest groups are often unable to afford advertising time on local television stations. Only this option says others do not have access to TV ad so public's vote will definitely be biased
(D) Different special-interest groups often take opposing positions on questions of which policies the state should adopt.
(E) Television stations are reluctant to become associated with any one political opinion, for fear of losing viewers who do not share that opinion.

_________________

Cheers,
SD

Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 192
Re: Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2010, 15:19

If the proponents of policies can't afford to put a advertisement on local stations, its obvious that the wealthy people will try to infulence the voters through ads on televisions.

Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 195
Location: India
Re: Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2010, 15:24
1
_________________

Cheers,
SD

VP
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1084
Re: Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2018, 22:42
C- The wealthy people can influence public using advertisement while Proponents of policies will not able to afford any ads, consequently lose the vote.
_________________

Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Best Gmat Resource:
GmatPrep CR|GmatPrep SC|GmatPrep RC

My Notes:

Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2018
Posts: 108
Re: Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2018, 22:53

Proponents of policies can't afford to pay for ads.And wealthy people use ads on television to influence voters.

Sent from my ASUS_Z00AD using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________

Re: Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the &nbs [#permalink] 23 Apr 2018, 22:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the

## Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.