Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
100%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 2
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Maximum allowable production levels of pollution for industrial concerns are usually determined in legislation that is based in large part on the recommendations of scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency. Industrial concerns must pay a fine that is proportional to the level of pollution that exceeds the limit, and this proportion should be revised every year based on the number of firms that exceeded the limit the year before to maximize the penalties assessed to polluters. However, the revision process usually occurs less frequently than once a year because lobbyists for industrial concerns usually persuade the government to hold off so as to avoid having to pay increased fines for pollution.
If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a revision should occur?
(A) A dozen fewer firms were over the limit, but their total pollution over the limit increased over the last year. (B) Two more firms exceeded the limit than the year before, but the net level of pollution over the limit decreased. (C) No more firms went over the limit than the year before, but the amount of total pollution over the year before went up. (D) No firms were over the limit, and total pollution decreased by about forty percent from the year before. (E) Several fewer firms were over the limit than the year before, and the total pollution over the limit decreased accordingly.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Maximum allowable production levels of pollution for industrial concerns are usually determined in legislation that is based in large part on the recommendations of scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency. Industrial concerns must pay a fine that is proportional to the level of pollution that exceeds the limit, and this proportion should be revised every year based on the number of firms that exceeded the limit the year before to maximize the penalties assessed to polluters. However, the revision process usually occurs less frequently than once a year because lobbyists for industrial concerns usually persuade the government to hold off so as to avoid having to pay increased fines for pollution.
If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a revision should occur?
(A) A dozen fewer firms were over the limit, but their total pollution over the limit increased over the last year. (B) Two more firms exceeded the limit than the year before, but the net level of pollution over the limit decreased. (C) No more firms went over the limit than the year before, but the amount of total pollution over the year before went up. (D) No firms were over the limit, and total pollution decreased by about forty percent from the year before. (E) Several fewer firms were over the limit than the year before, and the total pollution over the limit decreased accordingly.
Show more
It is entirely based on the number of firms that exceeded the limit.
Only B shows that the number of firms which went over the limit increased and hence a revision will cause the fine to go up.
Others have no change or have number of firms over the limit going down. So revision will cause fines to come down.
Maximum allowable production levels of pollution for industrial concerns are usually determined in legislation that is based in large part on the recommendations of scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency. Industrial concerns must pay a fine that is proportional to the level of pollution that exceeds the limit, and this proportion should be revised every year based on the number of firms that exceeded the limit the year before to maximize the penalties assessed to polluters. However, the revision process usually occurs less frequently than once a year because lobbyists for industrial concerns usually persuade the government to hold off so as to avoid having to pay increased fines for pollution.
If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a revision should occur?
(A) A dozen fewer firms were over the limit, but their total pollution over the limit increased over the last year. (B) Two more firms exceeded the limit than the year before, but the net level of pollution over the limit decreased. (C) No more firms went over the limit than the year before, but the amount of total pollution over the year before went up. (D) No firms were over the limit, and total pollution decreased by about forty percent from the year before. (E) Several fewer firms were over the limit than the year before, and the total pollution over the limit decreased accordingly.
Show more
IMO [spoiler]A[/spoiler] is the best choice, no of firms got reduced and still pollution levels went up. In this case definitely revision of policies should happen and these firms should pay more heavy fines. B can't be the answer because argument says the revision is based on the number of firms that exceeded the 'pollution; limit. The argument doesn't suggest that number of firms should increase in order for revision to happen. Moreover, according to B, net pollution level decreased and hence no need for revision.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.