Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 02:31 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 02:31
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
smartyman
Joined: 27 Jul 2011
Last visit: 21 Jul 2017
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
250
 [23]
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 38
Kudos: 250
 [23]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
20
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
jamesphw
Joined: 21 Nov 2013
Last visit: 18 Jun 2016
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
36
 [6]
Location: Canada
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Posts: 8
Kudos: 36
 [6]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,802
Own Kudos:
810,921
 [5]
Given Kudos: 105,868
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,802
Kudos: 810,921
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
WillEconomistGMAT
User avatar
Economist GMAT Tutor Instructor
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Dec 2013
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
193
 [4]
Given Kudos: 7
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 58
Kudos: 193
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
smartyman
Please help....

If p and q are positive integers, how many integers are larger than pq and smaller than p(q + 2)?
A) 3
B) P + 2
C) p – 2
D) 2p – 1
E) 2p + 1

Please solve using algebraic method because substitution will sometimes get the right answer but sometimes not.

The number of integers larger than pq and smaller than p(q+2) will be the number of integers between the two values. So, we start with the difference between the two:

p(q+2) - pq
pq + 2p -pq
2p

Then, subtract 1 for the upper bound (p(q+2).

So, 2p-1 is the correct answer.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,047
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi smartyman,

Did you try TESTing VALUES ("plugging in", "substitution" or whatever else you might choose to call it)? What happened when you did?

When you mentioned that it "will sometimes get the right answer but sometimes not", I think that you mean to say that "in most cases it will get you the correct answer on the first try, but in some cases there might be more than one answer that comes back as a match, so you would have to do a bit more work and substitute a second time." TESTing VALUES is a remarkably fast and useful approach on many Quant questions on Test Day, so you shouldn't avoid that tactic outright.

Here, if we use...
P=3
Q=4
We have to figure out the number of integers that are greater than 12 and less than 18. THAT is not a very difficult task: 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 --> a total of 5 terms. Plugging P into the answer choices gives us two matches: B and D. One of those IS the correct answer, so now we just have to do a little more work to prove which one.

IF....
P=2
Q=3
Then we're looking for the number of integers that are greater than 6 and less than 10. That's 7, 8, 9 --> a total of 3 terms. Between Answers B and D, only Answer D matches.

Final Answer:
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
pacifist85
Joined: 07 Apr 2014
Last visit: 20 Sep 2015
Posts: 322
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 169
Status:Math is psycho-logical
Location: Netherlands
GMAT Date: 02-11-2015
WE:Psychology and Counseling (Other)
Posts: 322
Kudos: 459
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is how I did it:

We need numbers between the 2 given values.

So, I started like this: pq<x<p(q+2)

Then, I plugged in numbers:
p=1 | q=2
pq= 1*2=2 and p(q+2)=1(2+2)=4, so there is one number in between: 3.

p=1 | q=1
pq=1*1=1 and p(q+2)= 1(1+2)=3, so there is one number in between: 2.

Finally, I looked at the answer options:
A. I skipped it because according to my solution there is only 1 number in between and not 3
B. P + 2: using p=1, as the first plug in number we get 1+2=3, we don't like that, so move on.
C. p – 2: same plug in, we get 1-2=-1, not really possible to have minus number or numbers in between, so move on.
D. 2p – 1: same plug in, we get 2*1-2=2-1=1, we like that, but checking E just in case, since there is still time.
E. 2p + 1: same plug in, we get, 2*1+1-2+1=3, we don't like it.

Only D gave as a solution only 1 number in between. So, D must be correct.

Anything wrong wit this approac? Time wise it didn't take that long (less than 2 mins definitely).
User avatar
Masterscorp
Joined: 14 Oct 2017
Last visit: 30 Mar 2021
Posts: 179
Own Kudos:
290
 [1]
Given Kudos: 385
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V41
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V41
Posts: 179
Kudos: 290
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatRichC
Hi smartyman,

Did you try TESTing VALUES ("plugging in", "substitution" or whatever else you might choose to call it)? What happened when you did?

When you mentioned that it "will sometimes get the right answer but sometimes not", I think that you mean to say that "in most cases it will get you the correct answer on the first try, but in some cases there might be more than one answer that comes back as a match, so you would have to do a bit more work and substitute a second time." TESTing VALUES is a remarkably fast and useful approach on many Quant questions on Test Day, so you shouldn't avoid that tactic outright.

Here, if we use...
P=3
Q=4
We have to figure out the number of integers that are greater than 12 and less than 18. THAT is not a very difficult task: 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 --> a total of 5 terms. Plugging P into the answer choices gives us just one match:


GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Hey Rich,

I usually plug in values too but in this case it doesn't work.
You said that plugging P into the answer choices gives us one match but there are two matches.

(B) P + 2 = 3 + 2 = 5

So B and D could work if we plug in numbers...
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,047
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Masterscorp,

Good catch! A bit more work was needed to prove the correct answer (and I've amended my explanation).

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,966
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,966
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109802 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts