The intended meaning in my opinion is-
Nitrous oxides are bad enough on the ground level. And in the upper atmosphere, they bond with free ions to create dangerous smog.We can eliminate
(B) and (D) for
S-V disagreement. "
It" is wrong here.
Only (A) (C) (E) remain.
Among these, (A) can be eliminated for using "atmospherically", it should be a noun depicting the place of bonding between NO and free ions. "Atmospherically" makes it an adverb modifying the action of bonding (how bonding was done). That's nonsensical.
Between (C) and (E) I am not sure either can be true. Grammatically, only option (C) stands but the meaning is not entirely clear. It would have been better if there weren't a "
but".
But depicts a change of thoughts/reversal of flow. Here, both the actions are in the same direction. There's no change in direction of some story, so the usage of "
but" since out of place.
Example.
(1) I love my work,
but it's becoming too demanding.
(2) There has been a rise in wages,
but the inflation rate has risen exorbitantly simultaneously, killing off all the gains of raised wages.
As you can see from the above examples,
usage of "but" indicates two contrasting ideas or to introduce an added statement, usually, something that is different from what you have said before. So, (C) is fishy to me for that reason.
If you have to use "but" then it would have made much more sense if the meaning in the sentence was something like-
(a) Nitrous oxides are bad on ground level, but they are beneficial in the upper atmosphere for they reflect harmful UV rays. OR
(b) Nitrous oxides are bad enough on ground level, but they are even more dangerous in the upper atmosphere.I think the author wants to imply the
second usage here. But, the shift between the ideas is not clearly implied. There has to be a shift in ideas. You may say that both the ideas in example (b) are in the direction, and you are right, they are, but they are related events depicting a slight difference between the level of nitrous oxides impact. The way the statement is written, it shows Nitrous oxides' two impacts. And the correct flow in my opinion would be: Nitrous oxides are bad enough on the ground level, and they bond with free ions in the upper atmosphere to create dangerous smog.
Option (E) on the other hand, though it keeps the two ideas in the same direction, it is grammatically wrong.
At ground level, nitrous oxides are bad enough,
as in the upper atmosphere they bond with free ions to create dangerous smog particles.
It joins dependent clause WITH an Independent clause with just a comma.