Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
09 Jan 2025, 23:37
Kudos
Bookmarks
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
48% (01:50) correct
52%
(02:04)
wrong
based on 597
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Two genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, are linked to hereditary breast cancer. Genetic testing, which can detect these genes, is increasing in both accuracy and prevalence. The test is also less painful and invasive than a mammogram, which is typically used to detect early signs of breast cancer. Therefore, we can expect the percentage of women who undergo mammograms each year to decrease.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Some women who are tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 will choose not to undergo a mammogram.
(B) The percentage of women undergoing mammograms each year has remained consistent over the last decade.
(C) Aside from BRCA1 and BRCA2, there are no other genes that are strongly linked to breast cancer.
(D) Doctors will continue to recommend regular mammograms for all women at risk of breast cancer, regardless of the results of genetic testing.
(E) A significant percentage of cases of breast cancer are linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Some women who are tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 will choose not to undergo a mammogram.
(B) The percentage of women undergoing mammograms each year has remained consistent over the last decade.
(C) Aside from BRCA1 and BRCA2, there are no other genes that are strongly linked to breast cancer.
(D) Doctors will continue to recommend regular mammograms for all women at risk of breast cancer, regardless of the results of genetic testing.
(E) A significant percentage of cases of breast cancer are linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2.
11 Jan 2025, 19:28
Kudos
Bookmarks
The premises tell us that genetic testing is improving and has some advantages over mammograms. The author then concludes that we should see a decrease in the usage of mammograms.
The main assumption here is that genetic testing is a viable alternative to mammograms. We're told that the tests are getting more accurate, but how do they compare to a mammogram? If genetic testing has gone from 20% accuracy to 50% accuracy, whereas mammograms have 98% accuracy, then we can imagine that few people would opt for genetic testing as a replacement for mammograms.
But even if testing is highly accurate, the author assumes that people will do this INSTEAD OF getting a mammogram. What if people did both? We don't have to know WHY they would do that to agree that A is a necessary assumption. If everyone who got genetic testing also got a mammogram, then the use of genetic testing would not lead to a decrease in mammograms. Therefore, A is a necessary assumption. At least some of the people using genetic testing need to opt out of the mammogram for the conclusion to hold up.
The main assumption here is that genetic testing is a viable alternative to mammograms. We're told that the tests are getting more accurate, but how do they compare to a mammogram? If genetic testing has gone from 20% accuracy to 50% accuracy, whereas mammograms have 98% accuracy, then we can imagine that few people would opt for genetic testing as a replacement for mammograms.
But even if testing is highly accurate, the author assumes that people will do this INSTEAD OF getting a mammogram. What if people did both? We don't have to know WHY they would do that to agree that A is a necessary assumption. If everyone who got genetic testing also got a mammogram, then the use of genetic testing would not lead to a decrease in mammograms. Therefore, A is a necessary assumption. At least some of the people using genetic testing need to opt out of the mammogram for the conclusion to hold up.
29 Jan 2025, 04:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
Let me take a shot at this.
Let's understand the argument first.
Background Info: Two genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, are linked to hereditary breast cancer.
Premise: Genetic testing, which can detect these genes, is increasing in both accuracy and prevalence. The test is also less painful and invasive than a mammogram, which is typically used to detect early signs of breast cancer.
Conclusion/Argument: Therefore, we can expect the percentage of women who undergo mammograms each year to decrease.
We need to find an assumption on which the argument depends. Assumption by itself should hold the conclusion together and negating this assumption should break the argument/conclusion.
(A) Some women who are tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 will choose not to undergo a mammogram.
That sounds good - if some women who are tested for these genes choose not to undergo a mammogram, the percentage of women who undergo mammograms each year will decrease. Let's also apply the negation technique here.
On negating A, you get:
No women who are tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 will choose not to undergo a mammogram.
If this were true, then genetic testing wouldn't affect mammogram rates at all. Let's hold onto A.
Let me clarify how negation works.
When negating an answer choice, you want to create the OPPOSITE meaning.
Let's look at choice A again:
Original: "Some women who are tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 will choose not to undergo a mammogram"
To negate this, we need the opposite of "some women will choose not to undergo" which would be "NO women will choose not to undergo" or more simply "ALL women will undergo"
So the proper negation would be:
"ALL women who are tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 will still undergo a mammogram"
The negation you suggested: "Some women who are tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 will choose not to undergo a mammogram" is actually the same as the original statement, not its negation.
(B) The percentage of women undergoing mammograms each year has remained consistent over the last decade.
This is just another background information and doesn't affect the conclusion in any way => eliminate.
(C) Aside from BRCA1 and BRCA2, there are no other genes that are strongly linked to breast cancer.
Irrelevant, eliminate.
(D) Doctors will continue to recommend regular mammograms for all women at risk of breast cancer, regardless of the results of genetic testing.
This assumption goes against the argument/conclusion => eliminate.
(E) A significant percentage of cases of breast cancer are linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2.
This is a valid assumption for any testing that relies on these two genes. Notice that the first line of the passage states that both these genes are linked to hereditary cancer and that genetic testing can detect them, but it doesn't say if a mammogram can detect them or not. So while it's good to have this information to strengthen our conclusion, it's not an assumption needed for the argument or conclusion to hold true. Let's also apply the negation test here:
A small percentage of breast cancer cases are linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2.
This does weaken the argument or conclusion a bit, but it still doesn't break it. Our argument is that "percentage of women who undergo mammograms each year to decrease". A small percentage of breast cancer cases linked with the two genes could still result in all of those people choosing genetic testing instead of mammograms and overall percentage of people who do mammogram would as a result, decrease. We're interested in decreasing the number of people who undergo mammogram due to genetic testing, by how much doesn't really matter.
Hence, (A) is the correct answer. Please let me know if this isn't clear or you have any follow ups.
Let's understand the argument first.
Background Info: Two genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, are linked to hereditary breast cancer.
Premise: Genetic testing, which can detect these genes, is increasing in both accuracy and prevalence. The test is also less painful and invasive than a mammogram, which is typically used to detect early signs of breast cancer.
Conclusion/Argument: Therefore, we can expect the percentage of women who undergo mammograms each year to decrease.
We need to find an assumption on which the argument depends. Assumption by itself should hold the conclusion together and negating this assumption should break the argument/conclusion.
(A) Some women who are tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 will choose not to undergo a mammogram.
That sounds good - if some women who are tested for these genes choose not to undergo a mammogram, the percentage of women who undergo mammograms each year will decrease. Let's also apply the negation technique here.
On negating A, you get:
No women who are tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 will choose not to undergo a mammogram.
If this were true, then genetic testing wouldn't affect mammogram rates at all. Let's hold onto A.
Let me clarify how negation works.
When negating an answer choice, you want to create the OPPOSITE meaning.
Let's look at choice A again:
Original: "Some women who are tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 will choose not to undergo a mammogram"
To negate this, we need the opposite of "some women will choose not to undergo" which would be "NO women will choose not to undergo" or more simply "ALL women will undergo"
So the proper negation would be:
"ALL women who are tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 will still undergo a mammogram"
The negation you suggested: "Some women who are tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 will choose not to undergo a mammogram" is actually the same as the original statement, not its negation.
(B) The percentage of women undergoing mammograms each year has remained consistent over the last decade.
This is just another background information and doesn't affect the conclusion in any way => eliminate.
(C) Aside from BRCA1 and BRCA2, there are no other genes that are strongly linked to breast cancer.
Irrelevant, eliminate.
(D) Doctors will continue to recommend regular mammograms for all women at risk of breast cancer, regardless of the results of genetic testing.
This assumption goes against the argument/conclusion => eliminate.
(E) A significant percentage of cases of breast cancer are linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2.
This is a valid assumption for any testing that relies on these two genes. Notice that the first line of the passage states that both these genes are linked to hereditary cancer and that genetic testing can detect them, but it doesn't say if a mammogram can detect them or not. So while it's good to have this information to strengthen our conclusion, it's not an assumption needed for the argument or conclusion to hold true. Let's also apply the negation test here:
A small percentage of breast cancer cases are linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2.
This does weaken the argument or conclusion a bit, but it still doesn't break it. Our argument is that "percentage of women who undergo mammograms each year to decrease". A small percentage of breast cancer cases linked with the two genes could still result in all of those people choosing genetic testing instead of mammograms and overall percentage of people who do mammogram would as a result, decrease. We're interested in decreasing the number of people who undergo mammogram due to genetic testing, by how much doesn't really matter.
Hence, (A) is the correct answer. Please let me know if this isn't clear or you have any follow ups.
