1/ DThe first paragraph opens by citing widespread academic agreement that reductions in transportation costs were the most important reason why Americans began to settle territory to the west of the original colonies. The narrator then asks “What forces drove that increase in efficiency?” and answers that question in general terms: Foreign innovations played a role, but the primary cause was American innovation to overcome logistical problems.
The rest of the passage is dedicated to the steamboat, which (as the narrator explicitly says near the beginning of the second paragraph) is a specific example of “American innovation to overcome logistical problems”. The second paragraph says more about what actually kicked off the process of invention, and the third paragraph shows how the steamboat was adapted by American innovators to suit three different local operating environments.
The answer is D.
INCORRECT ANSWERS:
(A) Scholars’ approaches are mentioned only at the very beginning of the passage, so they cannot possibly be the PRIMARY topic of the passage. Moreover, the passage only “compares” the scholars’ respective theses on one point, and does not “contrast” them at all.
(B) The “observation from historical economics” can only be the decrease in American transportation costs over the period 1800-1860. The passage does NOT “consider
competing explanations” for this phenomenon: The two contributing factors described (foreign inventions and American local innovations)
combined to make transport more economical. There is no indication that these factors “competed” or opposed each other in any way.
(C) The passage describes the invention of, and then several adaptations of, the early American steamboat, but these are not a “series”. (The invention came first, of course, but all of the subsequent adaptations were made separately and independently of each other—not in a well-defined sequence as indicated by the word “series”.) Furthermore, the passage does not
explain any specific mechanism by which steamboats helped to make transportation cheaper in general, so the “explain the economic effects” part of this answer choice isn’t satisfied either.
Finally, this choice leaves out the general historical pattern (paragraph 1) of which the steamboat is an EXAMPLE (as explicitly stated in paragraph 2: “exemplifies this type of invention”). The primary purpose is not merely to list a bunch of specific inventions.
(E) The “causal relationship asserted by historians” is the idea that cheaper transportation costs accelerated the westward expansion of the United States. The specifics about steamboats here are illustrations of the causal relationship between American local innovation and more efficient transport—a different relationship entirely.
.
2/ D“The author would
MOST LIKELY agree” means that the answer isn’t going to be something that’s explicitly stated in the text (if it were, you’d see words like “The passage indicates...” or “According to the author, ...” instead). Still, like all GMAT RC answers, the correct choice here must be
proved by the information in the text; in other words, we must be able to
derive the answer as a logical consequence of statements that actually ARE in the passage. In this sense, this problem works like an IMPLY/INFER/SUGGEST question.
The passage tells us exactly two things about the scholars’ theses:
• They mention a wide variety of factors behind the westward expansion of the United States between 1800 and 1860.
• All of them mention the drop in transportation costs—which (according to the author) was THE primary catalyst of settlement farther west—as one such factor.
That’s all we have about the scholars or their theses. What can we PROVE from these two statements?
Well... they all cited what the author says is the definite Number 1 factor, but beyond that, they mentioned a bewildering diversity of factors. So, that diversity must be among factors that the author does NOT consider to be primary causes. That’s choice D.
INCORRECT ANSWERS:
(A) Nothing in the passage has anything to do with cited source materials at all, let alone with specific methods of verifying the integrity of such sources. (The word “reliably” is used here to mean “consistently” or “in consensus”, a meaning that is completely unrelated to the “reliability” = historical accuracy/integrity of reference sources.)
(B) Domestic vs. foreign innovations are mentioned by the passage author to support an idea that is not connected to the scholars’ theses. Nothing in the text indicates that the historical scholars dealt with geographical groups of inventions.
(C) We know that the increased affordability of transportation is mentioned by all of the scholars, but we are told nothing about whether the different scholars gave differential levels of emphasis to this factor—this statement COULD be true, but it could just as well be false.
(The declaration that this was the No. 1 factor in the westward expansion of the U.S. is made by the passage author, not by any of the scholars. It’s
possible that some of the scholars actually made this a secondary point—but equally possible that they all agreed that it was the most important factor. We just don’t know.)
(E) We’re told only that the scholars cite the drop in transportation costs as one of many catalysts of the westward expansion of the young United States. Whether the scholars actually
explained WHY transportation costs fell is not even known in the first place, so certainly we can’t say that they gave
DIFFERENT explanations for it!
.
3/ DThis question asks us for the choice containing something that the passage does NOT mention. It’s impossible to directly search a text for something that the author DOESN’T say—so we’re forced to use a process of elimination, in which we eliminate the four choices for which the author DOES supply specific instances/examples.
Before diving into the eliminations, we need to clarify exactly what we’re looking for:
What is “responsive invention”? Remember that, when you see highlighted text, you will ALWAYS need to look
elsewhere in the passage to define, contextualize, or otherwise clarify the highlighted words. (In other words, you’ll never get a GMAT problem on which all you have to do is read the words
that they’ve already highlighted for you. No GMAT problem is completely trivial.)
The phrase “responsive invention” is preceded by “THIS type of”—which tells us that the clarification we need is in the preceding lines. Looking at the end of the preceding paragraph (the other half of this topic transition), we find the definition of responsive invention: “innovat[ion] to solve problems that literally lay before their eyes.”
The only
instances of this process in this passage are the invention and then the various adaptations of the early American steamboat. So, the process here boils down to:
Eliminate the 4 things that steamboats DID do / WERE used for.
Let’s go:
(A) The passage spends an entire paragraph talking about how steamboats were adapted to operating needs on the Atlantic coast, on the rivers of the western territories, and on the Great Lakes—so you could actually re-eliminate this choice several times if you want to.
(B) According to the author, the basic conceptualization of steam-powered transport vehicles was “obvious” from the birth of steam power itself. If that idea was “obvious” for 100 years before anybody actually produced any such thing, then that’s 100 years during which huge numbers of people would have independently dreamed up the idea of steam-powered land and/or water vehicles—starting before Robert Fulton (the eventual producer of the first prototype steamboat) was even born. Eliminate.
(C) The author asserts that “the labor and expenses of [the steamboat’s] actual development waited for the promise of profit”, which is identical to the content of this answer choice. (Importantly, “the
promise” of profit” means an
assurance or
guarantee of eventual profit—not just a possibility of it.) Eliminate.
(D) This choice says that the migration of people and industry came
first. The primary historical pattern underlying almost the entire passage is the reverse—the innovations in transportation came first,
making possible a
subsequent influx of settlers and business interests—so the order here is backwards. The passage doesn’t contain any examples of the reverse causal order, so choice D is UNSUPPORTED—and is therefore the CORRECT answer.
(E) On the Atlantic coast, premium passengers from the existing sailboat lines switched to the new steamboat lines—transferring that segment of market share from sailboats to steamboats. Eliminate.
.
4/ EWe need a choice that helps to explain WHY designers made one of the “design adaptations” mentioned in the passage. (Not “one or more”! GMAT answers will not work in two separate ways, unless the question specifically gives two criteria and asks for a choice that meets both of them.)
So, let’s list those adaptations:
• Short, wide boats
• ... with as much room as possible to carry goods,
• ... that can make sharp turns,
• ... that can run in shallow water (as little as 2 feet deep).
The answer choice that would
motivate the creation of a boat with one of these features is the correct answer. We don’t know which bullet point is going to be the ‘winning’ one, so we need to check whether each choice would motivate
any of them.
(A) Extreme width does not motivate any of the design features listed above. If anything, this statement makes it LESS important for the boats to be able to navigate tight curves.
(B) The boats could not operate on frozen rivers, so the ice could not possibly have influenced
anything about their design.
(C) If it’s not possible to build roads or railroads, then water transport becomes more essential to the viability of the economy. So this choice would make steamboats more important—but it doesn’t speak to any of the specific design choices that went into them.
(D) This fact could well have motivated the design of steamboats with
open cargo areas (a potential adaptation that is NOT mentioned in this passage), but it cannot explain the development of any of the bullet points above. (In fact, this choice somewhat undermines the choice to make the boats short and wide, since “timber”—felled trees—is much longer than other conceivable types of cargo.)
(E) If the western rivers become extremely shallow for a defined period of time every year, then we have a perfect explanation of why the boats were engineered to be operable in as little as 2 feet of water. This is the correct answer.