Last visit was: 21 May 2026, 00:47 It is currently 21 May 2026, 00:47
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
joemama142000
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Last visit: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 645
Own Kudos:
Posts: 645
Kudos: 1,797
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
coolfish1103
Joined: 07 Jan 2006
Last visit: 09 Apr 2009
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Posts: 25
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
coolfish1103
Joined: 07 Jan 2006
Last visit: 09 Apr 2009
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Posts: 25
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
joemama142000
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Last visit: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 645
Own Kudos:
Posts: 645
Kudos: 1,797
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thanks coolfish. but is there a way to keep it simple and not use the quadratic formula?

here is how i started

bigger square: w=8x area=64x^2

smaller square= (5+x)^2

64x^2-(5+x^2)=132

then i just blanked. (poor math skills)
User avatar
coolfish1103
Joined: 07 Jan 2006
Last visit: 09 Apr 2009
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Posts: 25
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think you made a mistake, the width of the bigger square is (5+3x), not 8x.

It is possible to not use the Quadratic Formula, just takes some time to do number plug-ins. I did Quadratic Formula cause I do not want to deal with the plug-ins since there is a 2x.

Another way of solving this problem would be:

Big Square - Pathway = Small Square

(5+3x)(5+3x) - 132 = (5+x)(5+x)

25+30x+9x^2 - 132 = 25+10x+x^2

8x^2+20x-132 = 0

2x^2+5x-33 = 0

Try numbers for plug-in so the sum will added up to 5x, this one is actually not very difficult, after I tried it.

(2x+11)(x-3) = 0 [11x - 6x = 5x]

x = -5.5 or 3

(x+5)(x+5) = 8(8) = 64
User avatar
SunShine
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Last visit: 30 Aug 2007
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
Location: London
Posts: 127
Kudos: 56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
64 sq meter

if you extrapolate the corners of the patio to the walkaway line you can determine the area of the whole walk away.

such that (x+5)*x*4 + x*x *4 =132

by solving x=3,

so the side of the square is 5+3 = 8
area 8*8= 64

though it took more than 2 min to solve!



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!