It is currently 11 Dec 2017, 12:13

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Rate my AOA please

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2010
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Rate my AOA please [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2011, 04:40
Hello - Appreciate if you can rate my AOA please

The following appeared as part of an annual report sent to stockholders by Olympic Foods, a processor of frozen foods.
“Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5-inch print fell from 50 cents for five-day service in 1970 to 20 cents for one-day service in 1984. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its twenty-fifth birthday, we can expect that our long experience will enable us to minimize costs and thus maximize profits.”

AOA:
A report claims that cost of frozen food processing will come down as the companies learn to do things better and more efficient. The report has cited an analogy of colour film processing cost and time reduction. Further it cited that long experience of the company will enable it to reduce the costs and thereby generate more profits. While I understand as the processes become more industrialized the cost of production will come down but I see there are number of flaws in the way the report has concluded on cost reduction. I’ve listed and expanded the flaws in the subsequent paragraphs.

First, the report makes a general assumption that the cost will come down when you learn to do things better and efficient. The report fails to give any specific data points supporting this statement. While I agree that as you learn you become better and more efficient but it need not necessarily decrease cost of processing. It may be that one has learnt that there was a major QA process missing and the product was deficient which neither customer nor the company identified. To add a new QA process for a product, a company may have to add more resources, equipment and logistics. Clearly, learning is leading to efficiency but increasing the cost of process

Second the report assumes that the processes involved in color film and frozen food production are same. On what basis the report has compared? Is there any evidence which report could have shared to bring this analogy? The report does not even call out how learning and efficient ways has lead to cost reductions in printing. What I know about colour printing cost reduction is that when there was monopoly the industry demanded high prices. As the competition has increased printing industry was commoditised and only to retain market presence, the companies have started reducing printing prices or by adding more resources to reduce time to process. Clearly I don’t see any efficiency improvement in the production cost. May it went up but the industry could not reflect in the price because of competition.
Lastly and more importantly, the report assumes that greater the experience greater the productivity and thereby more reduction in costs. However, it misses that more experienced staff also demand higher wages and bonus. They also demand additional safety provisions and new equipment to improve the productivity. Motivating an experienced staff has tremendous costs involved. Therefore one cannot assume that experience will automatically reduce the costs.

To conclude, the report could have justified enough on its cost reduction plan by demonstrating some metrics on how their processes are improving and how the costs are reducing. I’m sure there will be many processes that could be fine tuned overtime and it can reduce the cost of operation significantly by a simple change but the report fell short of calling them out. The report could also have mentioned how the company is keeping its experienced staff motivated and what productivity gains plan it has agreed with the staff. This would have bolstered its overall plan and give more confidence to investors on cost reduction and profit improvements.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Status: App Time
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Posts: 40

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Location: United States (PA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Rate my AOA please [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2011, 11:35
Very well written. Personally, I try to avoid writing in first-person and posing questions, but that's just me. I would grade this essay very high (5-6).
_________________

My GMAT Story: tale-of-a-first-timer

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: Rate my AOA please   [#permalink] 14 Jun 2011, 11:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Rate my AOA please

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.