Last visit was: 28 Mar 2025, 02:55 It is currently 28 Mar 2025, 02:55
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 28 March 2025
Posts: 100,116
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92,748
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,116
Kudos: 711,471
 [95]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
88
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,400
Own Kudos:
4,236
 [20]
Given Kudos: 135
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,400
Kudos: 4,236
 [20]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,115
Own Kudos:
7,971
 [8]
Given Kudos: 1,860
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Products:
Posts: 3,115
Kudos: 7,971
 [8]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Aman_Gupta
Joined: 10 Jun 2023
Last visit: 22 May 2024
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
6
 [2]
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 12
Kudos: 6
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I need help in this question because according to the OA A, unnecessarily real estate agents are compared to real estate agents, this really makes no sense. please help
User avatar
gokul5544
Joined: 20 Jun 2022
Last visit: 30 Oct 2024
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
19
 [4]
Given Kudos: 279
Location: India
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
Products:
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
Posts: 15
Kudos: 19
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Aman_Gupta
I need help in this question because according to the OA A, unnecessarily real estate agents are compared to real estate agents, this really makes no sense. please help

Hi Aman, One way to look at this is that real estate agents familiar with the specifics can price a house better than a automated website. The argument says this is because these real estate agents take into account of those said specifics.

But what if someone counters by saying what if all real estate agents are better are pricing because of their prior experience in pricing. (This is just one reason I made up)

In that case we would compare real estate agents who take into account intangible aesthetic factors vs the other set of real estate agents. This is exactly what the answer is doing.

This is a type of question where you are trying to show that there is no other explanation for the phenomenon mentioned. A good way to do that is by eliminating an alternative explanation.
avatar
yogesh122
Joined: 16 Apr 2022
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 120
Location: India
Schools: ISB '23
Schools: ISB '23
Posts: 29
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatophobia
Bunuel
Real estate agent: Some Web sites offer automatic appraisals of the market value of almost any home, based on the recent selling prices of other homes nearby. But a real estate agent familiar with a home and its neighborhood can assess the home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can. Unlike the Web sites, a real estate agent can take into account a home's intangible aesthetic factors, such as views and interior design.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the real estate agent's argument?

A. In general, real estate agents who take into account intangible aesthetic factors assess homes' market values far more accurately than other real estate agents do.

B. Most real estate agents take into account at least some intangible aesthetic factors when assessing a home's market value.

C. By considering a home's own sales history, a Web site can automatically account for many intangible factors specific to that home.

D. It is in a home seller's financial interest to have a real estate agent assess the home's market value as accurately as possible.

E. The recent sales prices of other homes in a neighborhood reflect intangible aesthetic factors that affect the desirability of the neighborhood as a whole.

Conclusion of the argument: A real estate agent familiar with a home and its neighborhood can assess the home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can.

Support Provided: Unlike the Web sites, a real estate agent can take into account a home's intangible aesthetic factors, such as views and interior design.

We have to strengthen the argument and show that in a scenario in which a home's intangible aesthetic factors were assessed, the home's market value was far more accurate than in a scenario in which the market value was not assessed.

Answer choice elimination:

A. In general, real estate agents who take into account intangible aesthetic factors assess homes' market values far more accurately than other real estate agents do.

This option tells us that in a situation in which intangible aesthetic factors are taken into account, the homes' market values are far more accurate compared to a situation in which intangible aesthetic factors are not taken into account. From the argument, we know that real estate agents familiar with a home and its neighborhood can assess the home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can, hence this option helps strengthen the conclusion and gives us a reason to believe that the conclusion will hold true. We can keep this for now and move to other options.

B. Most real estate agents take into account at least some intangible aesthetic factors when assessing a home's market value.

We don't know the extent to which the intangible aesthetic factors need to be considered to assess a home's market value. The use of the adverb 'some' keeps the argument vague.

Option A is better. We can eliminate B.

C. By considering a home's own sales history, a Web site can automatically account for many intangible factors specific to that home.

This statement weakens the conclusion. We can eliminate this option.

D. It is in a home seller's financial interest to have a real estate agent assess the home's market value as accurately as possible.

This is a trap choice. The reason for an accurate assessment is not what we are trying to strengthen. Our aim is to provide support for the fact that a real estate agent can, by taking into account a home's intangible aesthetic factors, assess a home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can. We can eliminate this option.

E. The recent sales prices of other homes in a neighborhood reflect intangible aesthetic factors that affect the desirability of the neighborhood as a whole.

This option lends no support (or weakens to some extent). The argument states that the websites offer automatic appraisals of the market value based on the recent selling prices of other homes nearby. Hence, if the prices of homes in a neighborhood reflect intangible aesthetic factors, those prices can be considered by the websites. However, this option doesn't support the conclusion that real estate agents can perform a far more accurate assessment than automated websites. Hence, we can eliminate this option.

Option A

IMO Option A is just the combination of Premise and Conclusion stated above. But a real estate agent familiar with a home and its neighborhood can assess the home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can. Unlike the Web sites, a real estate agent can take into account a home's intangible aesthetic factors, such as views and interior design. If we combine these 2 sentences, option A will be made and in GMAT restating same thing is not correct if we have another better option.

Now take a look at B. Most real estate agents take into account at least some intangible aesthetic factors when assessing a home's market value. This option clearly states that most of the agent take into consideration of intangible. This is the base of the argument. In argument as well as in the Option A, it is stated that Agent can take into consideration and give true market value of home. But what if, Agents do not do this regularly, then whole argument will be collapsed.
I could not understand why OA is A. Bunuel bb GMATNinja sayantanc2k
User avatar
thelastskybender
Joined: 26 Dec 2022
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 134
Own Kudos:
64
 [2]
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 134
Kudos: 64
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yogesh122
gmatophobia
Bunuel
Real estate agent: Some Web sites offer automatic appraisals of the market value of almost any home, based on the recent selling prices of other homes nearby. But a real estate agent familiar with a home and its neighborhood can assess the home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can. Unlike the Web sites, a real estate agent can take into account a home's intangible aesthetic factors, such as views and interior design.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the real estate agent's argument?

A. In general, real estate agents who take into account intangible aesthetic factors assess homes' market values far more accurately than other real estate agents do.

B. Most real estate agents take into account at least some intangible aesthetic factors when assessing a home's market value.

C. By considering a home's own sales history, a Web site can automatically account for many intangible factors specific to that home.

D. It is in a home seller's financial interest to have a real estate agent assess the home's market value as accurately as possible.

E. The recent sales prices of other homes in a neighborhood reflect intangible aesthetic factors that affect the desirability of the neighborhood as a whole.

Conclusion of the argument: A real estate agent familiar with a home and its neighborhood can assess the home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can.

Support Provided: Unlike the Web sites, a real estate agent can take into account a home's intangible aesthetic factors, such as views and interior design.

We have to strengthen the argument and show that in a scenario in which a home's intangible aesthetic factors were assessed, the home's market value was far more accurate than in a scenario in which the market value was not assessed.

Answer choice elimination:

A. In general, real estate agents who take into account intangible aesthetic factors assess homes' market values far more accurately than other real estate agents do.

This option tells us that in a situation in which intangible aesthetic factors are taken into account, the homes' market values are far more accurate compared to a situation in which intangible aesthetic factors are not taken into account. From the argument, we know that real estate agents familiar with a home and its neighborhood can assess the home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can, hence this option helps strengthen the conclusion and gives us a reason to believe that the conclusion will hold true. We can keep this for now and move to other options.

B. Most real estate agents take into account at least some intangible aesthetic factors when assessing a home's market value.

We don't know the extent to which the intangible aesthetic factors need to be considered to assess a home's market value. The use of the adverb 'some' keeps the argument vague.

Option A is better. We can eliminate B.

C. By considering a home's own sales history, a Web site can automatically account for many intangible factors specific to that home.

This statement weakens the conclusion. We can eliminate this option.

D. It is in a home seller's financial interest to have a real estate agent assess the home's market value as accurately as possible.

This is a trap choice. The reason for an accurate assessment is not what we are trying to strengthen. Our aim is to provide support for the fact that a real estate agent can, by taking into account a home's intangible aesthetic factors, assess a home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can. We can eliminate this option.

E. The recent sales prices of other homes in a neighborhood reflect intangible aesthetic factors that affect the desirability of the neighborhood as a whole.

This option lends no support (or weakens to some extent). The argument states that the websites offer automatic appraisals of the market value based on the recent selling prices of other homes nearby. Hence, if the prices of homes in a neighborhood reflect intangible aesthetic factors, those prices can be considered by the websites. However, this option doesn't support the conclusion that real estate agents can perform a far more accurate assessment than automated websites. Hence, we can eliminate this option.

Option A

IMO Option A is just the combination of Premise and Conclusion stated above. But a real estate agent familiar with a home and its neighborhood can assess the home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can. Unlike the Web sites, a real estate agent can take into account a home's intangible aesthetic factors, such as views and interior design. If we combine these 2 sentences, option A will be made and in GMAT restating same thing is not correct if we have another better option.

Now take a look at B. Most real estate agents take into account at least some intangible aesthetic factors when assessing a home's market value. This option clearly states that most of the agent take into consideration of intangible. This is the base of the argument. In argument as well as in the Option A, it is stated that Agent can take into consideration and give true market value of home. But what if, Agents do not do this regularly, then whole argument will be collapsed.
I could not understand why OA is A. Bunuel bb GMATNinja sayantanc2k


I am not GMATNinja , but let me try with this one.
Premise: A real estate agent can take into account a home's intangible aesthetic factors such as A, B etc
Conclusion: real estate agent > automated Web site ( in accuracy of the assessment )
As you can see that there is a gap- we need to assume that these intangible aesthetic factors somehow contribute to assess the home's true market value accurately---Option A is based on this same very assumption as it shows that intangible aesthetic factors can make a difference in assessing the home's true market value accurately!

Option B has no impact on our conclusion[(1) First notice the word "can" in the conclusion- we are talking about the ability of agents (2) what if these intangible aesthetic factors don't matter at all in terms of accuracy of the assessment?)]
User avatar
jaky_nguyen
Joined: 13 Apr 2017
Last visit: 05 Jan 2025
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 42
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
When I approached the question for the first time during my mock test, my reasoning is a bit different from the above.

A. In general, real estate agents who take into account intangible aesthetic factors assess homes' market values far more accurately than other real estate agents do.
This answer shows us that the automatic appraisals might not better than the real estate agents who consider intangible aesthetic factors.
- The automatic appraisals in the argument are based on the recent selling prices of other homes nearby which are driven by both real estate agents who take into account intangible aesthetic factors and others.
- Therefore, some nearby homes are valued at more accurately, while the others are valued at less accurately, resulting in the automatic system less accurate

B. Most real estate agents take into account at least some intangible aesthetic factors when assessing a home's market value.
Similar to the above reason, as most real estate agents take into account at least some intangible aesthetic factors, the system might be as accurate as real estate agents in assessing hose value
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 4,796
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 4,796
Kudos: 1,484
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Real estate agent: Some Web sites offer automatic appraisals of the market value of almost any home, based on the recent selling prices of other homes nearby. But a real estate agent familiar with a home and its neighborhood can assess the home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can. Unlike the Web sites, a real estate agent can take into account a home's intangible aesthetic factors, such as views and interior design.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the real estate agent's argument?

A. In general, real estate agents who take into account intangible aesthetic factors assess homes' market values far more accurately than other real estate agents do.

B. Most real estate agents take into account at least some intangible aesthetic factors when assessing a home's market value.

C. By considering a home's own sales history, a Web site can automatically account for many intangible factors specific to that home.

D. It is in a home seller's financial interest to have a real estate agent assess the home's market value as accurately as possible.

E. The recent sales prices of other homes in a neighborhood reflect intangible aesthetic factors that affect the desirability of the neighborhood as a whole.


The passage talks about how websites can give a house valuation based on the recent sales of nearby houses. But how real estate agents who know the area can provide a more accurate valuation because they know other factors such as views and interior design.

We're asked to look for a strengthener.

(A) is the answer. It gives credibility to how important intangible factors are when making a valuation by saying that real estate agents who consider intangible factors (i.e. views) give a more accurate valuation than real estate agents who don't.
User avatar
Gemmie
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 517
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 517
Kudos: 295
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­A. In general, real estate agents who take into account intangible aesthetic factors assess homes' market values far more accurately than other real estate agents do.

By stating that agents who consider intangible factors are more accurate, it implies that these factors significantly contribute to accurate market value assessments. This supports the claim that real estate agents, who can assess these factors, provide more accurate valuations than automated websites that may not consider such nuances.­
User avatar
SergejK
Joined: 22 Mar 2024
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 170
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 74
Posts: 170
Kudos: 462
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Would Choice C work as a weakener? Just hypothetically. Wouldn't it go against the stated premise that web sites are not able to do so? "Unlike web sites" clearly states that web sites are not able to do what real estate agents can.­

EDIT: Ah, I see now. Under "unlike other web sites" only one reason is presented why they cannot do what real estate agents can do: take into account a home's intangible aestetic factors such as views and interior design. Choice C presents an alternative to how the web sites can actually account for many intangible factors, without the need of considering the factors used by the real estate agent, by considering home's sales history. Correct?­

EDIT2: Why does the strengthener not use the comparison that is used in the conclusion? We only know that choice A talks about a comparison between real estate agents. However, I thought that the correct strengthener would compare real estate agents to web sites.
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 786
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Products:
Posts: 786
Kudos: 124
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Real estate agent: Some Web sites offer automatic appraisals of the market value of almost any home, based on the recent selling prices of other homes nearby. But a real estate agent familiar with a home and its neighborhood can assess the home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can. Unlike the Web sites, a real estate agent can take into account a home's intangible aesthetic factors, such as views and interior design.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the real estate agent's argument?

A. In general, real estate agents who take into account intangible aesthetic factors assess homes' market values far more accurately than other real estate agents do. - the idea that "home's intangible aesthetic factors" are important is clearly conveyed.

B. Most real estate agents take into account at least some intangible aesthetic factors when assessing a home's market value. - 51% take into account, and 49% don't. The argument doesn't need "most." The argument is just about "a" real estate agent who takes this into account vs websites that don't take "home's intangible aesthetic factors" into account.

C. By considering a home's own sales history, a Web site can automatically account for many intangible factors specific to that home. - Weakener.

D. It is in a home seller's financial interest to have a real estate agent assess the home's market value as accurately as possible. - out of scope.

E. The recent sales prices of other homes in a neighborhood reflect intangible aesthetic factors that affect the desirability of the neighborhood as a whole. - weakener.
User avatar
Sanira12
Joined: 16 Nov 2024
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Posts: 14
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Real estate agent: Some Web sites offer automatic appraisals of the market value of almost any home, based on the recent selling prices of other homes nearby. But a real estate agent familiar with a home and its neighborhood can assess the home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can. Unlike the Web sites, a real estate agent can take into account a home's intangible aesthetic factors, such as views and interior design.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the real estate agent's argument?

A. In general, real estate agents who take into account intangible aesthetic factors assess homes' market values far more accurately than other real estate agents do.

B. Most real estate agents take into account at least some intangible aesthetic factors when assessing a home's market value.

C. By considering a home's own sales history, a Web site can automatically account for many intangible factors specific to that home.

D. It is in a home seller's financial interest to have a real estate agent assess the home's market value as accurately as possible.

E. The recent sales prices of other homes in a neighborhood reflect intangible aesthetic factors that affect the desirability of the
To strengthen the real estate agent's argument, option A is the most compelling:

"In general, real estate agents who take into account intangible aesthetic factors assess homes' market values far more accurately than other real estate agents do."

This supports the agent's claim by emphasizing that considering intangible factors like views and design leads to more accurate appraisals compared to methods, automated or otherwise, that overlook such nuances. These factors are highly subjective and require expertise to evaluate properly, reinforcing the agent's argument for their value in real estate.

As an aside, firms specializing in team training and negotiation techniques, like CMA Consulting(https://cmaconsulting.com.au/), could enhance an agent’s ability to effectively communicate these unique appraisals to clients, ensuring greater trust and success in the market.
User avatar
Arvind96
Joined: 21 Nov 2024
Last visit: 29 Nov 2024
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
However, option a also provides area for weaken the author's argument as the latter half of the sentence suggests that some agents might not be able to assess the market price of the house accurately?
MartyMurray
The conclusion of the real estate agent's argument is the following:

a real estate agent familiar with a home and its neighborhood can assess the home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can

The support for that conclusion is the following:

Unlike the Web sites, a real estate agent can take into account a home's intangible aesthetic factors, such as views and interior design.

The correct answer must strengthen the support for the conclusion.

A. In general, real estate agents who take into account intangible aesthetic factors assess homes' market values far more accurately than other real estate agents do.

This choice strengthens the argument by indicating that taking into account intangible aesthetic factors does result in a more accurate assessment of a home's value.

After all, the fact that "real estate agents who take into account intangible aesthetic factors assess homes' market values far more accurately than other real estate agents do," allows for a comparison of the what occurs when taking into account intangible aesthetic factors is involved in assessments and what occurs when it is not involved.

We see that assessments that DO involve taking into account intangible aesthetic factors are more accurate than similar assessment that DO NOT involve taking into account intangible aesthetic factors.

Thus, this choice provides additional reason to believe that "a real estate agent familiar with a home and its neighborhood can assess the home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can" by indicating that the real estate agent's taking into account intangible aesthetic factors will indeed result in an assessment more accurate than one made by a web site that does not take into account such factors.

Keep.

B. Most real estate agents take into account at least some intangible aesthetic factors when assessing a home's market value.

Notice that the conclusion of the argument is that "a real estate agent ... CAN assess the home's true market value far more accurately." The conclusion is not that all real estate agents DO assess homes' true market values far more accurately than web sites.

Also, the support for that conclusion is that "a real estate agent CAN take into account a home's intangible aesthetic factors."

So, the reasoning is about what CAN occur because of what a real estate agent CAN do.

Now, notice that the fact stated by this choice "most real estate agents take into account at least some intangible aesthetic factors" does not mean that, as a result "a real estate agent ... can assess the home's true market value far more accurately." In other words, the fact that real estate agents take into account intangible factors doesn't mean that taking those factors into account makes any difference.

Regardless of what most real estate agents do, taking those factors into account may not make any difference.

So, this choice has no effect on the argument.

Eliminate.

C. By considering a home's own sales history, a Web site can automatically account for many intangible factors specific to that home.

If anything, this choice weakens, rather than strengthens, the argument by showing that, even though a web site may not be able to directly evaluate intangible aesthetic factors, an assessment by a web site may still indirectly take into account such factors and thus may not be as different from one made by an agent as the argument supposes.

Eliminate.

D. It is in a home seller's financial interest to have a real estate agent assess the home's market value as accurately as possible.

The fact stated by this choice doesn't indicate anything about how accurately a real estate agent can assess a home's market value. After all, what's in a home seller's interest and what a real estate agent can do are two different things.

Eliminate.

E. The recent sales prices of other homes in a neighborhood reflect intangible aesthetic factors that affect the desirability of the neighborhood as a whole.

This choice tempts us to choose it by mentioning "aesthetic factors" and thus seeming to be relevant to the argument.

At the same time, this choice certainly doesn't support the conclusion that "a real estate agent ... can assess the home's true market value far more accurately than any automated Web site can."

After all, we know from the passage that web sites do use "recent sales prices of other homes in a neighborhood" in assessing the values of homes. So, this choice indicates that web sites can take into account at least some intangible aesthetic factors, which indicates that real estate agents may have less of an advantage than the argument supposes they have.

Eliminate.

The correct answer is
User avatar
djangobackend
Joined: 24 Jun 2024
Last visit: 28 March 2025
Posts: 92
Own Kudos:
8
 [2]
Given Kudos: 45
Posts: 92
Kudos: 8
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ANALYSIS - author is thinking that these extra things that agents do actually help in assessing the prices accurately because if they don't then its of no use to mention this, so an option that suggests this will strengthen or an option that says that when these things were not present v/s when these things were present so there was a difference in accuracy in favor of the latter.


MISTAKE - I marked E but its weakening, since it conveys that websites are equally effective as agents. I did not understand the meaning of option E, I reached here by eliminating all other options so marked E.

B - doesn't make sense, how many agents do it we do not care.

A - I rejected A thinking that we do not need to compare agents who do this v/s agents who do not, but it actually helps, if agents who do it are far more accurate then it overall supports the position that agents are better than websites since agents do these things extra. so this option suggest that these "Extra things" actually are useful to us to accurately predict value.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7266 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts