Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
06 Mar 2012, 19:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
I am confused between the following two sentences
He appreciated the student's progress in Maths, but ignored what was made in English.
He appreciated the student's progress in Maths, but ignored that in English.
Which of the above two is correct usage per GMAT?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Crick
He appreciated the student's progress in Maths, but ignored what was made in English.
He appreciated the student's progress in Maths, but ignored that in English.
Which of the above two is correct usage per GMAT?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Crick
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
07 Mar 2012, 09:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
Let is apply a small pronoun test to find the difference. A pronoun should be logically replaced by the noun it stands for.
1.He appreciated the student's progress in Maths, but ignored what was made in
English.
Here the pronoun ‘what’ stands for progress; try to replace ‘what’ with progress. The resultant structure will be ‘While he appreciated a noun, he ignored a clause. Is it logical and parallel?
2.He appreciated the student's progress in Maths, but ignored that in English.
Here ‘that’ also stands for progress and is perfectly replacable, because you apprpeciated a noun in the first place and ignored a noun in the second place. Perfect foil.
This is only to say that 'what and that' may not be interchangeable after all.
1.He appreciated the student's progress in Maths, but ignored what was made in
English.
Here the pronoun ‘what’ stands for progress; try to replace ‘what’ with progress. The resultant structure will be ‘While he appreciated a noun, he ignored a clause. Is it logical and parallel?
2.He appreciated the student's progress in Maths, but ignored that in English.
Here ‘that’ also stands for progress and is perfectly replacable, because you apprpeciated a noun in the first place and ignored a noun in the second place. Perfect foil.
This is only to say that 'what and that' may not be interchangeable after all.
Daagh is right as far as he pursues this. The credited answer must make sense if you replace the pronoun with its antecedent. He is also correct that "the student's progress was made in English" is a clause, and so not parallel with "the student's progress in Maths" (though the GMAT is American, and so would use "math").
That's not the only problem with your first option, though. Notice that even if you drop the word "was," so that substitution of the antecedent yields a fine sentence, "what" would still be wrong. Why? Frankly, the grammatical reasons are probably too abstruse to bother about, so I'd just treat this as a diction/idiom-ish question, and say "trust your ear," which advice I almost never give.
In case you're in the mood for abstruse grammatical issues, though... "What" is not an ordinary pronoun like it, it's, they, them, their; nor a relative pronoun, like that, which, , who, whom, when, where; nor even a demonstrative pronoun like this, that, these, those.
Huh? Well, let me give a slightly technical account, and then a simple bottom line.
The slightly technical account: "what" is usually used as what is called an "interrogative pronoun." You use it to ask questions ("What should we order for lunch?") or to describe questions ("Find out what the special at Los Cantaros is.") I believe that I have seen the interrogative "what" used on the GMAT SC in the latter way, but never in a contested part of the question. So we probably don't need to worry about that.
"What" can also be used in some circumstances in which "that which" or "the thing(s) that" would be grammatically correct but awkward ("What I like even better than the sopa is the birria.") I have seen the "what" used on the GMAT SC in this way, but not in a contested part of the question. So we probably don't need to worry about that.
"What" does a few additional jobs in Standard Written English, but those jobs are even less relevant to the GMAT.
The simple bottom line: if the real GMAT gives you a choice between some other pronoun and "what", choose the other pronoun, unless your ear demands otherwise. If you have a terrible ear for this sort of thing, look for some other split first.
That's not the only problem with your first option, though. Notice that even if you drop the word "was," so that substitution of the antecedent yields a fine sentence, "what" would still be wrong. Why? Frankly, the grammatical reasons are probably too abstruse to bother about, so I'd just treat this as a diction/idiom-ish question, and say "trust your ear," which advice I almost never give.
In case you're in the mood for abstruse grammatical issues, though... "What" is not an ordinary pronoun like it, it's, they, them, their; nor a relative pronoun, like that, which, , who, whom, when, where; nor even a demonstrative pronoun like this, that, these, those.
Huh? Well, let me give a slightly technical account, and then a simple bottom line.
The slightly technical account: "what" is usually used as what is called an "interrogative pronoun." You use it to ask questions ("What should we order for lunch?") or to describe questions ("Find out what the special at Los Cantaros is.") I believe that I have seen the interrogative "what" used on the GMAT SC in the latter way, but never in a contested part of the question. So we probably don't need to worry about that.
"What" can also be used in some circumstances in which "that which" or "the thing(s) that" would be grammatically correct but awkward ("What I like even better than the sopa is the birria.") I have seen the "what" used on the GMAT SC in this way, but not in a contested part of the question. So we probably don't need to worry about that.
"What" does a few additional jobs in Standard Written English, but those jobs are even less relevant to the GMAT.
The simple bottom line: if the real GMAT gives you a choice between some other pronoun and "what", choose the other pronoun, unless your ear demands otherwise. If you have a terrible ear for this sort of thing, look for some other split first.
